Steven Cohen  |  January 13, 2020

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

bmw logo on vehicle

UPDATE 2:

  • This case was dismissed April 15, 2021.

UPDATE:

  • On March 19, 2020, a Colorado federal judge ruled that plaintiffs can proceed with a class action lawsuit over an alleged BMW engine defect that causes low oil levels.

A federal magistrate judge in Colorado has recommended that BMW of North America face a lawsuit brought by vehicle owners who claim that their cars consume an excessive amount of oil.

The plaintiffs say they purchased their BMWs between 2013 and 2015. They claim that, under the vehicle warranty, BMW told them that they would repair or replace any parts that were defective.

In addition, they allege that BMW made assurances that their cars did not have any workmanship defects.

The Magistrate’s report and recommendation states that each of the vehicles purchased by the plaintiffs held a twin-turbocharged engine called the N63, which is widely known to use up excessive amounts of engine oil.

To be sure, the judge’s report notes that the N63 engine was included in a 2015 Consumer Reports study on excessive oil consumption in vehicles. Also, the judge opines that BMW enthusiasts have complained about the N63 defect dating back to September 2011.

“After purchasing the subject vehicles, each Plaintiff observed that their engines consumed an excessive amount of engine oil, requiring oil changes well before BMW’s recommended oil change intervals throughout the warranty periods,” the judge’s opinion states.

The judge also writes that the oil consumption defect is dangerous because it can cause the engine to fail at any time while the vehicles are in motion, which would expose drivers and passengers to an accident and possibly injury.

“Each Plaintiff promptly and repeatedly complained to BMW’s authorized dealerships about the excessive engine oil consumption, but the dealers responded that the excessive oil consumption was normal and did not offer or recommend any repairs,” the magistrate judge writes.

In addition, the judge states that BMW issued a number of technical service bulletins to address the increase of complaints about the N63 engine. In December 2014, in response to the complaints about the allegedly defective engine, the defendant created the N63 Customer Care Package, which asked representatives to check numerous parts of the vehicle and recommended that vehicle owners alter their oil change intervals to 10,000 or one year from 15,000 or two years.

The judge writes that plaintiffs “have also been burdened with out-of-pocket expenses due to additional service visits and increased maintenance costs, and will suffer significant loss when they sell the subject vehicles due to the now-public research establishing the vehicles have an oil consumption defect.”

The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit in December 2018 alleging that BMW violated the breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and violation under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. They are seeking monetary damages and replacement or repair of their BMWs.

BMW settled a similar class action lawsuit in July 2018 by vehicle owners who claimed that the 2009-2014 BMW 5 series, 6 series, 7 series, X5, and X6 vehicles that were equipped with N63 engine that consumed an excessive amount of oil.

The plaintiffs in the current action had opted out of that class action settlement.

Do you own a BMW equipped with an N63 engine? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiffs are represented by Sergei Lemberg and Vlad Hirnyk of Lemberg Law LLC.

The BMW Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is O’Connor, et al. v. BMW of North America, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-03190, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


235 thoughts onBMW Must Face Oil Guzzling Class Action

  1. Ann Weis says:

    Add me. I drive 2014 BMW

  2. Angenetta Frison says:

    I have a 2007 BMW X5 that burns excessive oil well before scheduled maintenance. I’ve attempted to have the oil leak fixed, but I don’t think it has been properly identified. Occasionally there are puddles of oil on the ground underneath my vehicle.

    The car now smells of burning oil at times that comes in through the exhaust vents. This is my only vehicle. I have to drive around with bottles of oil in my car to replenish when the light come on. I’ve name numerous complaints at both dealers here in Northern IL no dealer will acknowledge mfg defective or reasonable price resolution.

  3. Richard says:

    I have had my 2011 550i M Sport for two years now. Beautiful car, it is, but the amount of money I have dumped into it and still continue to OUTSIDE of normal maintenance is certainly breaking the bank and the heart. The car puts out blue smoke at idle and thick, white smoke when I accelerate, usually after the car has been idling for 5 minutes or more. I have been told that it is burning coolant, which I usually top off every 1,500 miles or so. The turbos are also starting to leak. I find it hard to justify using my heater, unless I circulate the air in the cabin, because the smell of burning oil or coolant from the engine bay starts to flow in and makes me and my family nauseous. I have also had to replace the battery, wiring system, and head unit at a cost $9k including parts and labor. I have grown fond of this machine, but I think about getting rid of it often.

  4. Renzo Fountain says:

    Worst Car ever, Have basically rebuilt the entire engine after only 3 months after purchase

  5. Robert says:

    My 2007 just just leaks oil all over the place and burns oil every darn day and smokes I believe the engine has decectst

1 19 20 21

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.