J.G. Wentworth class action overview:
- Who: Plaintiff R.R. filed a class action lawsuit against The J.G. Wentworth Co.
- Why: R.R. claims J.G. Wentworth shared sensitive financial information about its consumers with third parties without their knowledge or consent.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court.
A new class action lawsuit accuses J.G. Wentworth of sharing sensitive financial information about its consumers with third parties without their knowledge or consent.
Plaintiff R.R. claims J.G. Wentworth embedded web trackers on its website that transmitted the contents of consumers’ loan applications to third parties without their knowledge or consent.
“These trackers perform various functions, often with the ultimate purpose of analyzing consumer information, and then monetizing those analyses by further disclosing the information to advertisers,” the J.G. Wentworth class action lawsuit says.
R.R. seeks to represent a nationwide class and a California class of consumers who submitted contact information through J.G. Wentworth’s website in connection with an application for a financial product or service offered by the company within the past two years.
J.G. Wentworth failed to inform consumers of trackers, class action alleges
R.R. claims J.G. Wentworth failed to inform consumers about the trackers, which allegedly disclosed sensitive information contained in the consumers’ loan applications, such as their names, email addresses, phone numbers, loan amount, income, homeownership status, credit worthiness and, in the case of a home equity line of credit, the home’s value and equity.
The plaintiff argues J.G. Wentworth failed to obtain the sufficient consent required under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and related state statutes to disclose consumers’ sensitive financial information to third parties.
“Despite legal and ethical duties to protect consumers’ financial information, [J.G. Wentworth] undermined the importance of safeguarding consumers’ financial information, breaching consumers’ trust,” the J.G. Wentworth class action lawsuit says.
R.R. claims J.G. Wentworth is guilty of violating the Electronic Communication Privacy Act and California Information Privacy Act and of intrusion upon seclusion, breach of confidence and negligence.
The plaintiff demands a jury trial and requests declaratory and injunctive relief and an award of statutory damages, disgorgement of profits, costs and attorneys’ fees.
Similarly, Hilton, LinkedIn, PNC Bank and Wells Fargo are facing class action lawsuits alleging they secretly tracked users’ online activity using pixel trackers and other hidden technologies.
Have you ever submitted contact information through J.G. Wentworth’s website? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiff is represented by Yaman Salahi, Nicole Cabañez and Taylor Applegate of Salahi P.C. and Albert Plawinski of Plawinski PLLC.
The J.G. Wentworth class action lawsuit is R.R. v. The J.G. Wentworth Co., Case No. 3:26-cv-03082, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Casely reannounces recall for over 400K power banks due to fire, burn hazards
- Capital One $425M class action settlement approved over savings account interest claims
- Roku, TCL face class action over software updates that allegedly ‘brick’ smart TVs
- Kenvue seeks dismissal of class action alleging baby oil misrepresents ingredients
9 thoughts onJ.G. Wentworth hit with class action over alleged sharing of loan application data without consent
Hello, my name is debra . When my son was 7 years old he was shocked on a PGE power line while climbing a tree with the powerlines rubbing against main trunk of the tree. My son grabbed the powerlines not seeing it. The voltage was so massive it flung him 40 feet in the tree and resulting with massive electrical burns being his right hand being totally melted it and then the current shot through his body and exiting through his left hand and upper left leg causing intense severe electrical burns. Resulting in 13 reconstructive surgery’s on his hands and leg. His right hand had 3 amputation on his little finger. PGE was very gracious and complied to my son’s medical needs and helped financially for me as a single parent to stay home with him for a year until his plastic surgery’s and rehabilitation was complete and he was stable. PGE and I through my attornery came to an agreement. I agreed to a structured settlement of $1,055,000 paid on certain birthdates of his life. I recently discovered some papers of him selling his Annuities for a discusting amount of $27,000+ total. The lawyer was in New York and court papers were signed under Massachusetts Judge without my signature being Conservator of my son who was a minor when settlement was settled and by Oregon law states that legally they needed my consent and signature to aquire rights to his annuities when he became of age. They entered false information about his injury etc. I would like to further this legally to have my son’s annuities returned to him in full . I structured this for him to assist with any future medical issues etc. These People encouraged him to sell his annuities by stalking and retriving his information to gain his $. My legal rights were totally neglected and I believe their intentions were nothing but dishonest and illegal being that I was the legally the one who did this settlement on behalf of my son whom these people avoided, so they robbed him of what I had set up this for my son. Thank you, Debra Joye
I was looking for a loan to pay off my credit cards and I’m now paying to another company for the loan. I messaged them when this all started and asked where my money was going to pay on a savings account to pay on my credit cards after they go into ( I think the words they used was default ) collections. When it comes to this kinda stuff I’m not the brightest.
Add me
I 3 to 8 loan calls a day I never applied for for.
Add me please
Add me
Add me
Add me
Add me