Jessica M. Semins  |  December 11, 2020

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Nationstar Mortgage is being challenged legally.

Nationstar Mortgage agreed to settle an action commenced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for $91 million to resolve allegations surrounding mortgage servicing misconduct and deceptive practices that resulted in financial harm to borrowers.

The proposed settlement was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Dec. 7, 2020. If approved by the court, the stipulated judgment will resolve a number of claims raised by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Attorneys General in every state against Nationstar Mortgage concerning wrongful conduct in connection with the servicer’s alleged compliance violations and purported history of operational failure.

According to the complaint filed by the CFPB, Nationstar Mortgage — also known as Mr. Cooper — engaged in alleged misconduct and abusive mortgage servicing practices spanning from 2012 to 2015 in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010. The complaint states that the company serviced nearly two million loans in 2014 and currently services loans for three million borrowers with a total of roughly $500 billion in unpaid principal loan balances.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that Nationstar Mortgage, the third-largest mortgage servicer in the U.S., violated the law by improperly increasing permanently modified monthly loan payments, wrongfully foreclosing on mortgages, failing to honor loan modification agreements, and mismanaging escrow accounts.

According to the CFPB’s complaint, the mortgage servicer also failed to remove private mortgage insurance timely from accounts under the Homeowner’s Protection Act (HPA), as well as pay property tax disbursements on time in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

Despite its written promises, Nationstar Mortgage “initiated foreclosures and even sold borrowers’ homes while the borrowers’ loss mitigation applications or appeals were pending,” as alleged in the CFPB’s complaint. The complaint also maintains that there was at least one instance in which a borrower had accepted a modified mortgage and was wrongfully foreclosed upon, despite performing on the mortgage. In other instances, as stated in the complaint, borrowers met the criteria for permanent modifications of their mortgages but the company increased payments wrongfully, resulting in foreclosure on some borrowers.

The CFPB’s complaint also says that the mortgage servicer failed to analyze escrow accounts, creating shortages in the accounts of borrowers who were making mortgage payments in accordance with a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan approved by the court. The complaint contends that Nationstar Mortgage would then initiate attempts to collect on the deficiencies without getting the required permission from the bankruptcy court.

Additionally, the Attorneys General allege in their complaint that the mortgage servicer violated state consumer protection laws which prohibit unfair practices and deceptive acts, as well as the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010.

The settlement came after a multi-year investigation which involved the efforts of the CFPB and state bank regulators.

Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation Secretary Deborah Hagan stated in a CFPB press release, “This settlement demonstrates the crucial role of state financial services regulators in ensuring that homeowners are protected as they obtain and pay down their mortgages—especially homeowners who may be struggling with making their payments.”

In a statement concerning the settlement, Jay Bray, president and CEO of Nationstar Mortgage remarked, “We are pleased to resolve this matter. When these issues were identified several years ago, we immediately made restitution to our impacted customers and invested in process improvements to prevent reoccurrence.”

Nationstar Mortgage is being challenged legally.What Are the Terms of the CFPB’s Settlement Agreement with Nationstar Mortgage?

As part of the settlement, Nationstar Mortgage is required to enhance its error resolution policies and processes for handling consumer complaints.

The stipulation mandates that the mortgage servicer maintain a consumer complaint form online that is accessible to borrowers, and provide accurate information to borrowers concerning how they may submit their complaints. Additionally, the company must accurately indicate each error identified in a borrower’s complaint and communicate the corrections made to the borrower.

The settlement agreement also includes provisions for proper escrow management and analysis, servicing transfers, loss mitigation practices, communications concerning private mortgage insurance cancelations, as well as an annual lookback and redress plan.

Nationstar Mortgage must also submit a compliance plan to the regional director outlining the steps the mortgage servicer will be taking to ensure the actions mandated in the agreement are effectively carried out.

The $91,255,843 settlement will allot over $22 million in consumer remediation, in addition to the $62 million in remediation that was previously provided to consumer borrowers. Under the agreement, Nationstar Mortgage must also pay out $1,205,000 to the participating states in administrative costs and penalties, $3,860,900 in attorneys’ fees, investigative costs and fees pursuant to the Attorney General Consent Judgment and $1.5 million in civil monetary penalties to the CFPB.

The Nationstar Mortgage Settlement is The State of Alabama, et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-03551 and Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Nationstar Mortgage, Case No. Case 1:20-cv-03550 filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Join a Free Mortgage Lender Consumer Protection Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you are a California resident who has had a dispute in the last year with one of these banks over billing, past due payments, foreclosure or interest rates, you may be eligible to join a free class action lawsuit investigation:

  • Bank of America
  • Caliber Home Loans
  • Capital One
  • Fairway Independent Mortgage
  • Freedom Mortgage
  • HSBC
  • Loan Depot
  • Navy Federal
  • PNC
  • Quicken Loans
  • Union Bank
  • United Wholesale Mortgage
  • US Bank
  • Wells Fargo

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


54 thoughts onNationstar Mortgage Agrees to $91M Settlement with the CFPB

  1. Jorge Vazquez says:

    Selling my information,with out my authorization is a violation of my privacy.

  2. Russell Wayne says:

    We filed Chapter 7 including the homesteaded home in Florida and other debtors before the auction time. Which we did file and the date and time before the auction time.  Nationstar mortgage company still sold our home As an REO to themselves after we filed our Stay. Now they are again selling it as an Auction REO before we have creditors hearing. They even sent us the sale docs. We have had people canvassing our home daily, knocking on our door at all hours. Plus taking pictures and walking around home and talking to our neighbors about our home. They didn’t even serve us with the auction date and time I found it online because of a many previous date and time they tried to do the same thing in the past. My wife has stage four cancer and radiation treatments and causing undue stress on the family please advise.  I’m older, wife deathly ill and nowhere to go or options. How do we stop the relentless hounding of Nationstar company and potential suitors? Sorry for the length of the question. This has gone on for 10 plus years with harassment and illegal filing against this family.

  3. Kimberly Beth Long says:

    would like to be contacted. I was forced out of modification and into deed in lieu after threat of foreclosure. This has then made it so I was not able to secure a loan for a another home and subsequently have not been able to get out of debt and lost equity and security.

  4. Be says:

    I’ve always thought that if BoA had not sold my mortgage to this shady company (after my co-signers credit went south) – then I WOULD STILL HAVE MY HOUSE! This company was a nightmare to work with. I don’t *think* they illegally went into foreclosure in my case, but they might have (late 2018). I finally found a job and called them and they told me it was gone – mighty fast – so they had to be busy selling while I was in bankruptcy. But before the job issue, there seemed to always be some bs I was dealing with and I hated that company. My question – given all the complaints all over the internet – why are they still allowed to be in business? And why are companies like BoA allowed to transfer our mortages to crappy companies we don’t want to do business with, without our permission?? Heck, would not be surprised if BoA were silent owners.

    Reminded of these bad times due to some joke of a fee settlement I’ve been contacted about – like getting the nominal fee value back in 2023 is some sort of win. (Yes, a win for the lawyers – but I don’t have my house because I had to deal with a shady company – how does a pittance remedy that? I am now paying out my nose for rent – THANKS MR COOPER!!!!!!! (vomit)

  5. Rosarina Barajas says:

    Add me to list

    1. Rita says:

      My loan was transferred several times during the pandemic and in forbearance. Somehow my loan ended up with nationstar. My father passed away from covid on Aug. 28 2022. I was in so much distress at the time and felt pressured to sign the modification and request it be signed by October 1, 2022. Nationstar more mortgage charged me 10000.00 to handle a modification. Is this legal?

  6. Kimberley Leduc Paradis says:

    I had nastionstar mortgage and mr cooper. How did I end up with close to $50,000 interest free in my lab amount????

    1. Felicia Mallary says:

      They added 58,000 to my loan as well after I been paying payments for years.

    2. Felicia Mallary says:

      They claim I owe them money that I do not owe. I refinanced my house with them and now I owe double the amount when I first got the loan after I been making payments for seventeen years. I have spoken to them on the phone over and over again with no help. I had my house for over thirty years and they want to take it and steal all the equity out of it. They are crooks.

  7. Kathleen A VASDIAS says:

    We tried to make the last loan modification payment by phone and the employee there told my husband he was a fraud and hung up on him. Consiquently we lost our home. The are the worst, slimmest, corrupt mortgage company on this planet

1 3 4 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.