Status: In progress

Prescott v. Abbott Laboratories

Abbott allegedly falsely advertises its Glucerna shakes and powders as being useful to help control diabetes.

  • Deadline to file a claim: TBD
  • Proof of Purchase Required: No
  • Potential Individual Reward: TBD
  • Total Settlement Amount: TBD
  • States Involved

Abraham Jewett  |  November 20, 2023

Category: Food
Glucerna products on display in a store, representing the Glucerna class action.
(Photo Credit: Joni Hanebutt/Shutterstock)

Update:

  • Abbott Laboratories asked a California federal court to dismiss claims it misled consumers by marketing that its Glucerna shakes are scientifically designed to help individuals with diabetes. 
  • Abbott argues the consumer behind the complaint relied on studies that failed to show a Glucerna label stating the product can “manage blood sugar” is untrue. 
  • Abbott further claims the label has a symbol next to it that points consumers to a more in-depth explanation about how the product can help individuals with diabetes. 
  • The consumer argues Glucerna shakes, despite their labeling, contain ingredients that are harmful to people with diabetes, including sucralose, carrageenan, choline chloride and maltodextrin. 

Glucerna diabetes class action lawsuit overview: 

  • Who: Steven Prescott filed a class action lawsuit against Abbott Laboratories. 
  • Why: Prescott claims Abbott falsely advertises that its Glucerna brand shakes and powders can be used to help control diabetes. 
  • Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court. 
  • What are my options: Glucerna customers may be interested in products from Amy Myers MD.

(Sept. 05, 2023)

Abbott Laboratories falsely advertises that its Glucerna shakes and powders are “formulated specifically for diabetes,” when, in reality, they allegedly contain ingredients that can make the condition worse, a new class action lawsuit alleges. 

Plaintiff Steven Prescott claims the Glucerna shakes and powders contain sucralose and other key ingredients that have been shown to deregulate blood sugar and worsen or, in some cases, cause diabetes. 

Prescott argues that, rather than disclose the alleged health risks associated with the Glucerna shakes and powders, Abbott chooses to falsely advertise the products’ effects so as to benefit financially. 

“Defendant’s deceptive marketing has proved profitable, and Defendant now enjoys a leading market position in the multi-billion-dollar health foods industry,” the Glucerna class action states. 

Prescott wants to represent a nationwide class and California subclass of consumers who have purchased a Glucerna product within the past four years. 

WHO advises against using sugar alternatives such as sucralose to treat diabetes, class action says  

Prescott argues the World Health Organization (WHO) advises against using sugar alternatives, such as the sucralose found in the Glucerna shakes and powders, due to its connection with an “increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality in adults.” 

“On May 15, 2023, the WHO released a set of guidelines urging against the consumption of sucralose, among other non-sugar sweeteners, ‘to control body weight or reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs),’ including diabetes,” the Glucerna class action states. 

Prescott claims Abbott is guilty of unjust enrichment and breach of express warranty, and of violating California’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act

The plaintiff is demanding a jury trial and requesting declaratory and injunctive relief along with an award of monetary damages for himself and all class members. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning letter in February to Lyons Magnus — a third-party manufacturer for Abbott — after determining the company was in violation of food safety regulations in the wake of a 2022 recall that included Glucerna products, among others. 

Have you purchased a Glucerna product within the last four years? Let us know in the comments.

The plaintiffs are represented by Shireen M. Clarkson, Bahar Sodaify, Alan Gudino and Ryan Ardi of Clarkson Law Firm PC. 

The Glucerna diabetes class action lawsuit is Prescott v. Abbott Laboratories, Case No. 5:23-cv-04348, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

105 thoughts onAbbott seeks dismissal of Glucerna diabetes class action

  1. Cathleen Twohig says:

    Please add me. I always kept it on hand but will not any longer.

  2. Desiree A Kurtz says:

    I purchased Glucerna in order to keep my carb intake level. I had no idea it did not do what it says. Scam.

  3. Jessica N short says:

    Add myself and my husband. As well as my family members we use to drink these every day could not figure why our sugar was wacked out and no more than we drank them we was so tired couldn’t hold our heads up I finally figured out it took me over 2 years but once I stopped and my family our sugar has been great the saddest part is we easily spent $100 a week on this product in my house hold we paid out of our pockets we believe it would help our sugar yeah it was helping out us 6 feet under faster

  4. Latonya s says:

    Add me… I purchased the drinks for me and my mom…

  5. Valerie T Blaylock says:

    Have been purchasing Glucerna for my mother who has type 2 diabetes since 2011 to so-called help “manage” her diabetes.

  6. Sharon Thompson-Lloyd says:

    Please add me as I consistently purchase Glucerna Hunger Smart for type 2 diabetes

  7. Coloradogirl says:

    Yes have purchased.

  8. Dorothy Martin says:

    Please add me Thanks

    1. Mponyi says:

      Every time I drink container Of Glucerne I fall asleep!!

  9. Elizabeth says:

    I currently have vanilla, strawberry and chocolate. The plus have more calories saying it’s more protein however my sugar levels don’t stave off. It claims meal replacement as well 320 calories. Most diabetic people need more than 320 in a meal. If I only ate 320 x 3 times a day that would be 960 calories. If I’m correct 1200-1500 calories is normal for diabetic people . Sugar goes in leaving hungry later :(

    1. Michael says:

      I’m diabetic and used it to

  10. Sandy Mueller says:

    It’s not only Glucerna that has sucralose in it. It’s Muscle milk, Ensure, etc. etc. My Dr. just told me to get Glucerna. The Medical professionals have really changed over the last 2 years. I had to change Drs. recently because she moved on to different things. She was the best. Now, everything has changed. Too many things to list. So frustrating.

1 7 8 9

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.