Hyundai asked a federal judge to dismiss a class action lawsuit which alleges that the company concealed Elantra engine defects.
Plaintiffs claim that Hyundai Elantra vehicles from model years 2011 to 2016 suffer from a piston defect which causes the engine to fail.
The Hyundai Elantra class action alleges that Hyundai knowingly sold vehicles with the defects and violated warranty terms.
However, according to the automaker, the plaintiffs’ cars were old, had high mileage, and may not have been maintained sufficiently by the owners.
Hyundai argues that these factors mean that the owners’ vehicles were no longer eligible for warranty coverage when they reportedly failed.
“They allege that their vehicles’ years-old engines failed after being driven for more than 60,000 miles,” Hyundai Motor America said. “However, they do not allege that they maintained their vehicles at all, let alone in compliance with the terms of the written warranties. Such compliance is a prerequisite to coverage, and they, therefore, have failed to state a claim that HMA breached the express warranties.”
According to plaintiffs in the Hyundai Elantra class action lawsuit, the piston defect most often manifests itself in the form of a knocking or ticking noise.
Other symptoms of the engine defect allegedly include loss of engine power, loss of power steering, loss of break assistance, and sudden stalling in addition to total engine failure.
Repairs for the issue may cost car owners $10,000 because the defect can only be solved by completely replacing the engine.
The Hyundai Elantra class action claims that the defect could be dangerous to consumers and place them at risk for accident, injury, and death if the engine fails while driving.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Brown allegedly experienced the issue with her 2013 Hyundai Elantra. In 2017, Brown reportedly began to hear ticking and knocking from her engine and, a week later, a loud pop was heard from the vehicle before the engine reportedly failed.
Brown says she attempted to file a warranty claim but her claim was denied when the dealer found “oil sludge, which was caused by her failure to timely change the oil in her vehicle,” which Hyundai cites in their motion to dismiss.
Hyundai argues that Brown’s claims should be dismissed because the Hyundai class action lawsuit was filed almost a year after the four year statue of limitations on warranty claims in New Jersey ended.
The dealer argues that the claims by two other plaintiffs, who purchased their vehicles used, experienced alleged engine failure at 72,000+ miles – well over the 60,000 mile limit imposed by the warranty. The fourth plaintiff had his engine replaced by Hyundai under warranty and therefore suffered no injuries or damages, the company claims.
Plaintiffs and the proposed Class are represented by Matthew D. Schelkopf and Joseph B. Kenney of Sauder Schelkopf LLC; Nicholas Migliaccio, Jason Rathod and Esfand Y. Nafisi of Migliaccio & Rathod LLP; and Daniel C. Levin of Levin Sedran & Berman.
The Hyundai Elantra Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Brown, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-11249, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2026 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
118 thoughts onHyundai Wants Elantra Engine Defect Class Action Dismissed