Jessica M. Semins  |  November 3, 2020

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Illegal number spoofing can incur fines.

The Federal Communications Commission imposed a $37.5 million fine on Tucson-based Affordable Enterprises of Arizona for making illegal calls using a number spoofing scheme to market its home improvement and remodeling services in violation of the Truth in Caller ID Act. Spoofed numbers, calling customers who are on the Do Not Call registry, and sending unwanted text messages can all result in fines.

According to the FCC’s Oct. 27, 2020 press release, the company used unassigned numbers, numbers assigned to “burner phones,” and numbers belonging to Arizona consumers, which would give the appearance of calling from local numbers and to “avoid receiving angry callbacks” when making its illegal telemarketing calls. The company purportedly engaged in the caller ID number spoofing scheme in violation of the Truth in Caller ID Act for 14 months, beginning in 2016.

The FCC’s investigation began with a tip from a former Affordable Enterprises employee who provided information that the company was spoofing numbers, including phone numbers placed on the Do Not Call Registry. The FCC confirmed its findings and imposed the monetary penalty based on a sample of 37,525 spoofed calls in a Forfeiture Order adopted on Oct. 27, 2020.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a press release that the facts uncovered in the investigation didn’t match up with Affordable Enterprises’ assertion that the company didn’t know that it was violating the Truth in Caller ID Act.

Pai commented, “From the get-go, the company deliberately ensured that its business name wasn’t included in caller ID information by using prepaid phones not registered to its business.”

Although the home improvement company argued that the proposed forfeiture penalty be reduced to .01%, in the amount of $3,752.50, the FCC found that the company’s actions warranted the full statutory penalty be imposed.

Pai remarked in his statement that the “slap on the wrist” requested by Affordable Enterprises was not an appropriate penalty given that the company “brazenly” used the numbers, with one innocent Arizona resident’s number being used 48,349 times, resulting in the number’s owner receiving over five angry calls each day requesting that the telemarketing calls cease.

FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks said in a statement, “Affordable clearly intended to obscure its identity, evade detection, and prevent consumers from opting out of future calls.”

Illegal number spoofing can incur fines.What Is Number Spoofing?

Number spoofing is an illegal practice often used by scammers and robocallers. Many scammers use “neighbor spoofing,” which involves the use of phone numbers similar to the one it is calling as consumers are more likely to answer a call from a local number. Scammers often use number spoofing tactics to steal personal and financial information for use in fraudulent activity.

Under the Truth in Caller ID Act, the FCC prohibits companies or individuals from transmitting false caller ID information with the “intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongly obtain anything of value.”

$10,000 fines can be imposed for each illegal number spoofing violation.

Under the FCC rules, telemarketers must display accurate phone numbers on caller IDs and the company name, if possible. The rules also require that a telephone number be displayed that consumers can call back during business hours to request not to be contacted.

STIR/SHAKEN and the TRACED Act

In an effort to combat illegal number spoofing and robocalls, the FCC has implemented regulations requiring the phone industry to adopt stringent caller ID authentication standards to help protect consumers. Referred to as STIR/SHAKEN, the implementation of the technology would enable phone companies to ensure that caller ID information matches the caller’s actual number.

Additionally, in December 2019, the TRACED Act was signed into law, amplifying the FCC’s efforts to put an end to the rampant practice of illegal robocalls and increase penalties for businesses and scammers who violate the law.

Join a Free TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you were contacted on your cell phone by a company via an unsolicited text message (text spam) or prerecorded voice message (robocall), you may be eligible for compensation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

This article is not legal advice. It is presented
for informational purposes only.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


16 thoughts onNumber Spoofing Scheme Earns $37.5M Fine for Arizona Telemarketer

  1. Larry Douglas says:

    add me please

  2. Lesia Pulliam says:

    Add me please!! I have been on since 2012… I get harassed 3-4 daily!!

  3. angela jackson says:

    I get calls all day everyday

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.