Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against the city of Los Angeles by five people who say they were misidentified as gang members by the Los Angeles Police Department.
Lead plaintiff Sarah Ochoa and others claim their First, Fourth and 14th amendment rights were violated when LAPD officers identified them as gang members or “gang associated,” leading them to suffer unreasonable detention, loss of employment and emotional damage, the class action lawsuit says.
A July 10 LAPD memo confirmed a total of 24 officers are being investigated for allegedly falsifying police reports and misclassifying civilians as gang members or associates, the class action lawsuit states.
LAPD officers Braxton Shaw, Michael Coblentz and Nicholas Martinez were recently charged with 59 criminal counts related to the falsification of police records, wrongly identifying individuals as gang members, NPR reported.
Prosecutors say body camera video shows the officers identified people as gang members even when the officers didn’t ask about the individual’s gang affiliation or when the person denied the accusation outright, according to NPR.
The officers face charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice, filing a false police report and preparing false documentary evidence, according to NBC News.
The LAPD class action lawsuit says the law enforcement agency has “manipulated the law to criminalize innocent people.”
LAPD officers often falsely incriminated Class Members by applying gang enhancements to relatively minor offenses, such as marijuana possession, leaving those defendants to the possibility of much harsher sentences, the complaint says. As a result, many of those charged accepted plea deals in order to avoid being locked up for decades.
“Others, who had the audacity to insist on their innocence, were found guilty by juries based on perjurious LAPD officers’ testimony, then sentenced to many years including, in numerous instances, life in prison,” the class action lawsuit claims. “Those same individuals have been forced to register annually as gang members at the very police stations where they were framed in the first place.”
Plaintiff Ochoa was a correctional officer with the state of California until she says she was victimized by the LAPD’s classification of her as a gang associate “simply for going back to visit the neighborhood she grew up in,” the complaint says.
Ochoa was allegedly subjected to unreasonable detention when she was handcuffed on a public street for about 20 minutes while her vehicle and belongings were “ransacked by LAPD officers,” the class action lawsuit states.
Another plaintiff, Jajuan Johnson, is a recent high school graduate from south Los Angeles and has no criminal record, according to the LAPD class action lawsuit.
Johnson was a passenger in a vehicle Jan. 13, 2019, when officers pulled the vehicle over, “ostensibly for tinted windows,” the complaint says.
Johnson alleges that LAPD officers came up with a reason to search the vehicle, then lied by contending in their report that Johnson was a member of the Blood street gang.
“The LAPD officers reasoned that because Mr. Johnson’s cousin was an alleged gang member, he too must be gang affiliated,” the class action lawsuit says. Johnson is currently being prosecuted pursuant to what he says is the fabricated gang allegation, though he has consistently denied belonging to any gang.
Johnson says because of the false claims, he has lost his job, his reputation has been damaged and he has suffered severe depression. If Johnson is convicted, he will be required to register as a gang member, the class action lawsuit claims.
The California Department of Justice revoked the LAPD’s access to the state CalGangs database in mid-July, the complaint says. A 2016 audit found the database was full of “questionable entries and errors such as the inclusion of year-old children.”
The class action lawsuit maintains that CalGangs represents racial profiling and provides little proof of the allegations of gang membership; a majority of the database consists of Black and Latino men.
The plaintiffs say the city of Los Angeles has failed to properly train LAPD officers “in the constitutional treatment of innocent civilians” and is grossly negligent in its indifference to the rights and liberties of the public and Class Members.
The class action lawsuit also accuses the defendants of perjury in open court and ratifying and condoning imposition of criminal sentencing enhancements on individuals misclassified as gang members or associates.
The proposed Class includes about 1,000 people subjected to misclassification as gang members in Los Angeles city reports, about 500 individuals who were added to a gang database and about 5,000 people misclassified as being “gang associated.”
The plaintiffs seek general and special damages; punitive damages; interest; reasonable court costs and attorneys’ fees; all other damages allowed by law; and any further relief the Court deems appropriate.
Have you ever been falsely accused of belonging to or being associated with a gang? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by Humberto M. Guizar and Christian Contreras of Guizar, Henderson & Carrazco LLP; Stephen A. King of Kings Justice LLC; and Austin R. Dove of Dove Law Corp.
The LAPD Gang Members False Identification Class Action Lawsuit is Sara Ochoa, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Case No. 2:20-cv-06963, in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
Black Lives Matter Lawsuit Claims Mass Detention of LA Protesters
Breonna Taylor Protesters File Police Brutality Lawsuit
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
3 thoughts onLAPD Officers Wrongly Classify People as Gang Members, Class Action Lawsuit Claims
In my case my autistic son 29 years old already, was wrongly classified as gang member when he was 16 years old, to the point he spent all his teenage life into California juvenile camps and later in the rounding door adult facilities county jails.
This classification leaded a situation that is destroying his life for been in and out from county jails all his life due to the lack of treatment and gross negligence by authorities in charge of.
That’s a very common issue with all of the police and sheriff’s departments in Southern California. Unfortunate today’s civil servants are so unjust. Terrible for the kids growing up to see such awful bigotry.
Im being accused of being a gang member because I have a a nick na!e everyone calls me and racial discrimination it started approximately 5 years ago while I was driving to my moms house to pick up my check from work I was stopped because officers thought I had stolen the car even though there was no report of a stolen vehicle just because it was a new car my ex had just bought after that I lost my job lost my family and had to come live with my mom again . Then during a time were I was in Compton looking for a job at a construction workplace I was.outside on the phone while 2 Sheriff’s pull my friend who driven me there out his car without warning as im about to start recording one of them pulls out his pepper spray to spray me and arrestes.me for resisting arrest.which was dismissed in court . Another incident accured when even though I turned myself in and bailed out after 2 weeks they came to.my backyard the same.day I was out on bail and accused me of having a warrant and said some technical difficulty happened and the warrant was unavailable in their office but since I had narcotics in my pocket charged me for possession for sales when. I clearly had a pipe and a lighter for personal use but left it out of the evidence and gave it to my brother who at the time was a minor this charge was also dismissed its gotten to the point were I was cited for riding a bike in the park and once while I was beimg.followed by so!some I called.911 and instead I got an automated !message sayimg.call 877 ask now this is ridiculous tried to get help from a attorney they all.say the same thing good luck finding someone who.will.take your case I’ve gotten hopeless and still fighting a case.with a.few charges pending for 2 years now iwhich I have been made.to pay bail payments during that whole time which has left me broke completely had my phone stolen 4 times once by lapd im not sure but there something very suspicious going on