Consumers may have legal options for having their online activity and personal information tracked through website tracking and pixel tracking technologies.
Consumers who visited one of the affected websites within the past two years may be eligible to take legal action related to website tracking practices and alleged data privacy violations.
What to know about the website tracking class action lawsuit investigation
- Core Issue: Attorneys are investigating whether Genesis House, Lifeforce, American Addiction Centers, Viatris, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and dozens of other health and recovery websites used website tracking and tracking pixel technology to collect and share visitors’ private information without their knowledge or consent.
- Who it Affects: People across the United States who visited one or more of the affected websites within the past two years.
- Legal Status: Attorneys are actively investigating these claims.
- Harm/Impact: Visitors’ sensitive health-related browsing activity, form submissions and personal data may have been transmitted to third parties without authorization, potentially compromising their data privacy.
- Take Action: If you visited one of the affected websites in the past two years, complete the form on this page to see if you may qualify to participate in the investigation.
What is the website tracking class action lawsuit investigation about?
Attorneys are investigating whether health, recovery and medical websites used website tracking and pixel tracking technology to collect and share visitors’ private information without their knowledge or consent.
These claims argue that:
- Tracking pixels on the websites may have silently collected sensitive visitor information
- Visitors may not have realized their activity and personal data were being tracked and shared
- The alleged website tracking practices may have violated federal and state data privacy laws
- Users may not have consented to the collection or sharing of their information
People who visited one or more of the affected websites within the past two years may have legal options worth exploring and may qualify to participate in a class action investigation.
Who qualifies for the website tracking class action lawsuit investigation?
You may qualify for a website tracking class action lawsuit investigation if you visited one of the following websites within the past two years:
- Genesis House
- Recovery.com
- California Prime Recovery
- Advanced Recovery Systems (ARS)
- Amen University
- Dreem Health
- Global LASIK and Cataract Institute
- Laser Eye Center
- Lifeforce
- The NeuroCognitive & Behavioral Institute
- Perrigo (ella and Products)
- Viatris (Xulane and Products)
- United Recovery Project
- Desert Cove Recovery
- Sobriety Centers of New Hampshire
- St. Joseph Institute for Addiction
- American Addiction Centers
- DrSays
- Oro House Recovery Centers
- Seasons in Malibu
- Puget Sound Recovery Centers
- Fair Oaks Recovery Center
- Cottonwood Tucson
- GoCoCo (Food Scanner App)
- Pacific Dermatology Specialists
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
Time limits may apply. Do not wait to check whether you may qualify.
Legally reviewed by: Jennifer Melainy
Chief Legal Marketing Officer, Siri & Glimstad LLP
The law firm responsible for the content of this page is: Siri & Glimstad LLP; New York, NY; 212-532-1091; sirillp.com.
Please fill out the form on this page for more information.
Case updates
Legal status as of May 2026
- Attorneys are actively investigating claims involving the websites listed on this page and their alleged use of website tracking and tracking pixel technology.
- Similar lawsuits and investigations have also been filed against other companies accused of using tracking pixels and website data tracking tools, including Honey Baked Ham, Hilton, PNC Bank and more.
This page was last reviewed and updated in May 2026 to reflect the latest case developments.
What is a tracking pixel and how does it work?
A tracking pixel is a tiny image or piece of code embedded in a webpage. It often goes completely unnoticed by users, but when someone visits the page, the pixel can send information about that visit — such as the user’s IP address, browser type, pages viewed and actions taken — to third parties for analytics, advertising or data tracking purposes.
On many retail and media websites, tracking pixels are commonly used for marketing and advertising. However, when these tools are placed on health, recovery or medical websites, the information they collect may become far more sensitive because it can relate to a person’s health concerns, treatment searches or other private activities.
Many users may not even realize that their browsing activity and personal information could be tracked and shared while visiting these websites.
Which websites are part of this investigation?
Attorneys are investigating whether the following companies use tracking pixels or other website tracking technology to allegedly collect and share visitors’ personal information without consent:
- Genesis House
- Recovery.com
- California Prime Recovery
- Advanced Recovery Systems (ARS)
- Amen University
- Dreem Health
- Global LASIK and Cataract Institute
- Laser Eye Center
- Lifeforce
- The NeuroCognitive & Behavioral Institute
- Perrigo (ella and Products)
- Viatris (Xulane and Products)
- United Recovery Project
- Desert Cove Recovery
- Sobriety Centers of New Hampshire
- St. Joseph Institute for Addiction
- American Addiction Centers
- DrSays
- Oro House Recovery Centers
- Seasons in Malibu
- Puget Sound Recovery Centers
- Fair Oaks Recovery Center
- Cottonwood Tucson
- GoCoCo (Food Scanner App)
- Pacific Dermatology Specialists
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
If you visited any of these websites within the past two years, you may be eligible to participate in the website tracking class action lawsuit investigation.
Fill out the form on this page to see if you qualify for a free case evaluation.
After you fill out the form, an attorney(s) or their agent(s) may contact you to discuss your legal rights.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. Top Class Actions is not a law firm, lawyer referral service, or prepaid legal services plan. We do not endorse or recommend any third-party claims processing company, lawyer, or law firm who participates in the network. We do not make any representation, and have not made any judgment, as to the qualifications, expertise, or credentials of any participating lawyer or processing group. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services or claims processing to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services or claims processing performed by other lawyers or claims processing group. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Top Class Actions does not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege because Top Class Actions is not a law firm. Instead, your information will be forwarded to an attorney(s) or their agent(s) or a claims processing firm for the purpose of a confidential review and potential representation if you qualify. You will only be contacted by an attorney(s) or their agent(s) in response to your inquiry if your initial information appears to qualify you for representation. If you are not contacted by an attorney(s) or their agent(s) within one week, you should consult another firm since all legal claims are subject to filing deadlines. All photos on this website are stock art and do not depict clients.
