Abraham Jewett  |  April 17, 2023

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A sign on a building that reads "United States Environmental Protection Agency," representing the EPA's proposal limiting chemical ethylene oxide for sterilization due to a risk of cancer.
(Photo Credit: blvdone/Shutterstock)

EPA ethylene oxide cancer overview: 

  • Who: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. 
  • Why: The EPA’s proposals would limit the use of ethylene oxide to sterilize medical devices at 86 facilities across the U.S. 
  • Where: Nationwide. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued proposals last week to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants that would limit the use of ethylene oxide, which presents a potential cancer risk, to sterilize medical devices at 86 facilities across the U.S.  

The EPA said it made the proposal after finding there was a higher than average cancer risk at the facilities, which use ethylene oxide — an antimicrobial chemical — to sterilize billions of medical devices every year.

The proposed amendments would decrease ethylene oxide emissions by around 80% at the U.S. medical sterilization facilities, according to the EPA

If finalized, EPA’s proposals are estimated to cut EtO emissions to the air from commercial sterilization facilities by 80% per year and apply more protective standards to control those emissions under the law,” the EPA said. 

Companies that use ethylene oxide would also be required to test for the chemical in the air and to make an effort to ensure their pollution controls are in good working condition, according to the EPA proposal

Exposure to ethylene oxide emissions harmful for workers in facilities, anyone nearby, EPA says

The EPA said exposure to ethylene oxide emissions not only has adverse health effects for individuals who work in facilities where it is used, but also potentially anyone who frequents areas nearby. 

“People who go to school near places where (ethylene oxide) is used are also potentially at an elevated risk of cancer due to (ethylene oxide) levels in the air,” the EPA said. 

The agency said the “actual risk,” of ethylene oxide exposure, however, would vary based on a facility’s “control measures for workers and community members and the distance and amount of time people live, work, or go to school near a facility.” 

The EPA said it received information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration before its proposals. 

Last month, the EPA proposed a rule that, for the first time, would limit the amount of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — also known as “forever chemicals” — allowed in drinking water

Have you gotten sick after being around the chemical ethylene oxide? Let us know in the comments! 


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

3 thoughts onEPA proposes limiting chemical ethylene oxide for medical device sterilization due to cancer risk

  1. M Wheeler says:

    When will this end? Food, meds, water, air, everything is somehow killing us. Please add me.

  2. Amber M Cavazos says:

    Ethylene Oxide Gas in gauze Covidien 2011 WE HAVE BEEN IN WAR!!Covid was Cancer. 💯💯💯

    1. Monique Lukens says:

      It was also allegedly on the c-19 pcr-tests, which went up some people’s noses. The Nobel Prize inventor of those tests, Dr. Kary Mullis, said the PCR tests can’t tell if a person is sick, so why were they used?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.