Jon Styf  |  November 21, 2023

Category: Legal News
Charter signage on a building, representing the Charter Communications fine.
(Photo Credit: John Hanson Pye/Shutterstock)

Charter Communications fine overview: 

  • Who: Charter Communications settled accusations from the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) by agreeing to pay a $25 million fine.
  • Why: Charter Communications is accused of violating audit controls related to internal stock buyback.
  • Where: The SEC fine for Charter Communications came from the SEC’s Washington, D.C. office.

Charter Communications agreed to a $25 million settlement after accusations from the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) that the company violated audit control requirements related to stock buybacks.

Companies and individuals are protected from insider trading liability if they follow SEC rules on buyback programs, but those programs are not allowed to maintain the ability to change planned purchases or sales after the trading plan has been initiated.

“The SEC’s order finds that, from 2017 to 2021, Charter used plans that included ‘accordion’ provisions, which company personnel described as giving Charter flexibility, that allowed Charter to change the total dollar amounts available to buy back stock and to change the timing of buybacks after the plans took effect,” the SEC fine announcement says.

The SEC Charter Communications stock findings show that the company included accordion provisions in nine separate trading plans over the four-year period and those trading plans, then did not follow what Charter’s board had approved.

SEC found that Charter’s buyback accordion provision violated rule and occurred due to accounting control issues

The SEC’s Charter Communications fine findings show that the reason the stock buybacks with accordion provisions repeatedly occurred was the company’s insufficient internal accounting controls, which included an absence of reasonably designed controls to analyze whether the accordion provisions given to executives to alter the company’s trading was consistent with what its board had approved.

“Companies whose boards authorize buybacks using Rule 10b5-1 plans must have controls that reasonably assure that their trading plans meet all of the rule’s conditions,” Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a statement. “This includes the fundamental requirement that, to benefit from the protection of Rule 10b5-1, traders have to relinquish their ability to influence the amount or timing of trades after their trading plans go into effect.”

Spectrum violated the law by “pounding” a South Carolina woman with dozens of unwanted phone calls that were not for her, a July class action lawsuit alleges.

Have you ever participated in a company stock buyback program? Let us know in the comments.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.