Steven Cohen  |  November 19, 2019

Category: Food

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Benihana sushi rolls on plateA class action lawsuit claims that Benihana advertises certain sushi rolls on their menu as containing crab, when in fact, they don’t.

Plaintiff Youngsuk Kim says that Benihana Teppanyaki, as well as RA Sushi and Haru restaurants, advertise their Shrimp Lovers Roll, Shrimp Crunchy Roll, Alaskan Roll, Dragon Roll, Chili Shrimp Roll, Rainbow Roll, Spider Roll, Sumo Roll Baked, Lobster Roll and the California Roll as containing crab meat. 

However, the Benihana class action states that these sushi rolls include imitation crab instead of real crab meat.

The Benihana class action lawsuit claims that even though the menu provides notice that “Kani kama crab” and “kani kama crab mix” includes imitation crab, the defendant does not disclose that these certain rolls contain the imitation crab mix, which misleads customers into believing that the food items are made with actual crab meat.

The plaintiff says Benihana engages in a “classic bait and switch tactic” by falsely labeling and advertising food containing crab, when it does not.

Kim claims that during the last four years, he has purchased sushi at Benihana which supposedly contained crab meat. He says that the in-store menus did not disclose that the sushi rolls he purchased included imitation crab.

The plaintiff alleges that he relied on Benihana’s misrepresentations on the menu and would not have purchased the food if he knew that the representations were false and misleading.

“They have intentionally misbranded the food products by using imitation crab meat in the Food Products, despite advertising that these Food Products contain ‘crab,'” the RA Sushi class action states.

“In light of Defendant’s representations and omissions, as alleged herein, regarding the Food Products, Plaintiff and members of the putative class reasonably believed that the Food Product contained crab meat,” the Benihana class action lawsuit alleges.

Kim states that had he been adequately informed that the rolls he purchased did not contain crab meat, we would have acted differently, by either not purchasing the products, or paying less for them.

The Benihana class action lawsuit alleges that the defendant engaged in the false, misleading, and deceptive advertising practices in order to increase its profits.

In addition, Kim says this practice also adds up to unlawful competition and “provides an unlawful advantage over Defendant’s competitors as well as injury to the general public.”

The plaintiff maintains that he and potential Class Members should receive punitive damages as Benihana acted with conscious disregard for their legal rights as a result of the deceit.

“Benihana intentionally concealed and failed to disclose the truth about its misrepresentations and false advertising scheme for the purpose of inducing Plaintiff and others similarly situated to purchase food items at Benihana,” the RA Sushi class action lawsuit states.

Kim claims that Benihana violated California’s Business & Professions Code, California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the warranty laws of California, California common law, Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, and New York Deceptive Acts and Practices Act.

The Benihana class action lawsuit was originally filed in California Superior Court in San Bernardino, but has been recently removed to federal court.

Did you order a sushi roll that you thought contained crab meat at Benihana? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiff is represented by Kenneth H. Yoon, Stephanie E. Yasuda, Brian G. Lee of Yoon Law APC, Preston H. Lim of Lim Law Group PC and Jon Yun Kim of the Law Offices of Jong Yun Kim.

The Benihana Crab Meat Class Action Lawsuit is Kim v. Benihana, Case No. 5:19-cv-02196, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


170 thoughts onBenihana Class Action Alleges Fake Crab In Sushi Rolls

  1. Spencer Engel says:

    I eat here pretty often. Please add me.

  2. Helen smith says:

    Uth add me

    1. Nancy Terrell says:

      Please add me. Thank you!!!!

  3. Cindy fleming says:

    Hello, please add me

  4. Jodie M Roskydoll says:

    Add me please

  5. Shelea Stewart says:

    Add Me Please

  6. Rudy Abraham says:

    Add me please.

1 15 16 17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.