ADT class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: Plaintiff Latonia James filed a class action lawsuit against ADT Inc.
- Why: James alleges ADT failed to protect customer data, exposing millions of records to hackers.
- Where: The ADT class action lawsuit was filed in Florida federal court.
A new class action lawsuit claims ADT, a home security and smart automation provider, failed to protect the personally identifiable information (PII) of millions of customers, leaving them at risk of identity theft and fraud.
Plaintiff Latonia James filed the class action lawsuit against ADT after a hacker infiltrated the company’s network on or about April 20, 2026, and exfiltrated sensitive customer data.
The stolen information includes names, phone numbers, addresses, dates of birth, last four digits of Social Security numbers, and tax IDs.
James alleges ADT maintained customer PII on systems it knew were vulnerable to cyberattack and failed to implement reasonable data security measures consistent with the Federal Trade Commission’s guidelines.
The complaint further alleges ADT failed to disclose the breach’s full scope to affected individuals, regulatory authorities and the public, leaving victims without information needed to protect themselves.
ADT publicly acknowledged the breach, stating it had directly notified all impacted individuals and would offer complimentary identity protection services.
James disputes this, alleging the company has failed to provide meaningful identity theft monitoring to her and many class members.
She further argues that even where services have been offered, their duration and scope are wholly inadequate given that breach victims commonly face multiple years of ongoing identity theft and financial fraud.
ShinyHunters allegedly threatened to leak 10M records unless ADT paid ransom
The class action lawsuit alleges a cybercriminal using the online moniker “ShinyHunters” posted on a dark web extortion site claiming to have stolen more than 10 million customer records.
The post issued a “Pay or Leak” ultimatum, demanding ADT respond by April 27, 2026, and threatened additional “digital problems” if the company refused to comply.
James alleges ADT’s systems represented a known and attractive target for cybercriminals yet the company failed to take adequate preventive measures to protect the data stored on them.
“Plaintiff and class members are now at a significantly increased and certainly impending risk of fraud, identity theft, intrusion of their privacy and similar forms of criminal mischief, risks which may last for the rest of their lives,” the ADT class action lawsuit states.
The lawsuit seeks at least 10 years of credit monitoring for all class members, along with damages and a declaratory judgment that ADT continues to breach its legal duty to protect customer data.
Meanwhile, Pennsylvania State Education Association agreed to pay $2.5 million to resolve claims stemming from a 2024 data breach that exposed sensitive member information.
What do you think of the allegations made in this ADT class action lawsuit? Let us know in the comments.
James is represented by Nicholas A. Colella and Stephen E. Connolly of Lynch Carpenter LLP.
The ADT class action lawsuit is James v. ADT Inc., Case No. 9:26-cv-80546, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- Target class action alleges ‘yogurt covered’ snacks contain no yogurt at all
- Cento class action claims company sells falsely certified San Marzano tomatoes
- Lawsuit accuses National Debt Relief of using spam emails, tracking pixels to monitor consumers
- Harvard Pilgrim class action lawsuit alleges ‘ghost network’ fraud
