Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Update:
- The 11th Circuit affirmed a $2.67 billion settlement agreement made to resolve claims health insurer Blue Cross Blue Shield engaged in anticompetitive practices.
- A federal court in Alabama previously signed off on the settlement agreement.
- Several class members argued the settlement agreement did not compensate them enough given the alleged antitrust violations.
- Home Depot, Topographic Inc., Employee Services Inc. and several individuals objected to the settlement.
- Blue Cross had been accused of dividing the United States into service areas and limiting competition among its members and outside insurers as a way to allegedly drive up costs for its own health insurance subscribers.
Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout overview:
- Who: Plaintiffs who opted out of a prior $2.67 billion settlement filed a new class action lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield.
- Why: Plaintiffs argue the settlement agreement does not properly compensate them for the alleged antitrust violations Blue Cross Blue Shield committed.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Florida federal court.
(Oct. 1, 2021)
Litigants who opted out of a $2.67 billion Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout that ended allegations of Sherman Act violations have filed their own class action lawsuit in Florida federal court.
Plaintiffs say the Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout doesn’t compensate them enough for the alleged violations, namely that the company used anticompetitive practices to drive up costs for its own health insurance subscribers.
The settlement concluded a class action lawsuit filed in 2013 alleging that 36 Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) organizations divided the country into service areas and limited competition between members and also from outside insurers.
Those who opted out of the BCBS settlement say that, while they concur with the court’s ruling that BCBS conduct should be viewed using a “per se,” standard, the agreement does not adequately compensate them given the antitrust violations BCBS committed.
“The plaintiffs have paid substantial sums directly to these entities in the form of inflated premiums, and they have paid substantial sums to third party medical providers as result of the defendants’ actions in the form of inflated deductibles, co-pays, and other expenses,” states the class action lawsuit.
A “per se,” standard of review dictates that innately anti-competitive behavior is illegal, regardless of any possible marketplace justifications, according to Law360.
The agreement also stipulates that, among other things, BCBS must end its “National Best Efforts Pact,” which requires members to obtain a minimum of two-thirds of their revenues from Blue-branded services, regardless of possible available alternatives.
Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout, terms not sufficient, according to objectors
Plaintiffs who opted out of the settlement agreement claim it does not go far enough to stop BCBS from engaging in poor conduct.
“The defendants have engaged and are still engaging in per se illegal market division and per se illegal output restrictions,” states the class action lawsuit. “The plaintiffs seek to enjoin an ongoing conspiracy between and among the BCBSA and the Blue Plans to allocate markets and impose output restrictions in violation of the prohibitions of the Sherman Act.”
Plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and requesting any legal or equitable relief the court deems just and proper, in addition to the court enjoining BCBS from engaging in antitrust and anti-competitive behavior.
Do you agree that the $2.67 billion settlement is not proper compensation for Blue Cross Blue Shield’s alleged antitrust violations? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by Michael Gulisano of Gulisano Law PLLC.
The Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout class action lawsuit is Hoover, et al. v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Association, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-23448, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
292 thoughts on11th Circuit affirms $2.67B Blue Cross antitrust settlement
please add me
Add me please
add me
PLEASE ADD ME.
Let us hope that those of us who chose not to participate in the initial case are not automatically added to this one. Some of us rather not have our details shared, so that is why we do not take part in these cases. I asked for my name to be purged (not the same as an opt-out).
I have submitted my information to be part of the settlement. I have had BCBS since 2008 until now 2023 and it’s still pending. I had copies of all my polices submitted them all and it’s still pending review.. Lois Riddle
The case just went into appeals that’s gone take a year but this has been going on a decade ridiculous
Hey like my mother tells me are you all trying to find justice in this world
Well, if payments were overcharged, how much did I overpay each time at dr, procedure, meds, surgeries hospital stays and meds????
Never received a penny or credit monitoring from Yahoo and Equifax??? That is a total joke. My husband received a check for $5.21 last week and so far, I have gotten nothing. Allegedly a link was supposed to sent to credit monitoring and neither of us ever received that either. I have emailed twice and have gotten the auto response. The attorney’s are laughing all of the way to the bank. :(
I opted in to the original BCBS settlement. I was a member for many years. The website states that my claim is under review. Further, there were objections to the settlement amount and those objections must be settled before any payments are released. That information came from the website. I’m not aware of any $5 or $12 payments. I certainly hope that based on the premium and co pays paid out that one will receive a descent settlement amount. The website give the formula which will be used to calculate how much one receives. With that being said, each claimant should receive a different amount of money. I’m disappointed that the lawyers handling the settlement is not providing the claimants with more information on their claim. Please advise if anyone receives valid information about the settlement.
BlueCard $2.67 Billion Settlement 9/9/22
Home Depot and MTA among objectors of $2.67B BCBS antitrust settlement. 10/11/22
Can you advise other 4 objectors?