Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Update:
- The 11th Circuit affirmed a $2.67 billion settlement agreement made to resolve claims health insurer Blue Cross Blue Shield engaged in anticompetitive practices.
- A federal court in Alabama previously signed off on the settlement agreement.
- Several class members argued the settlement agreement did not compensate them enough given the alleged antitrust violations.
- Home Depot, Topographic Inc., Employee Services Inc. and several individuals objected to the settlement.
- Blue Cross had been accused of dividing the United States into service areas and limiting competition among its members and outside insurers as a way to allegedly drive up costs for its own health insurance subscribers.
Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout overview:
- Who: Plaintiffs who opted out of a prior $2.67 billion settlement filed a new class action lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield.
- Why: Plaintiffs argue the settlement agreement does not properly compensate them for the alleged antitrust violations Blue Cross Blue Shield committed.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Florida federal court.
(Oct. 1, 2021)
Litigants who opted out of a $2.67 billion Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout that ended allegations of Sherman Act violations have filed their own class action lawsuit in Florida federal court.
Plaintiffs say the Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout doesn’t compensate them enough for the alleged violations, namely that the company used anticompetitive practices to drive up costs for its own health insurance subscribers.
The settlement concluded a class action lawsuit filed in 2013 alleging that 36 Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) organizations divided the country into service areas and limited competition between members and also from outside insurers.
Those who opted out of the BCBS settlement say that, while they concur with the court’s ruling that BCBS conduct should be viewed using a “per se,” standard, the agreement does not adequately compensate them given the antitrust violations BCBS committed.
“The plaintiffs have paid substantial sums directly to these entities in the form of inflated premiums, and they have paid substantial sums to third party medical providers as result of the defendants’ actions in the form of inflated deductibles, co-pays, and other expenses,” states the class action lawsuit.
A “per se,” standard of review dictates that innately anti-competitive behavior is illegal, regardless of any possible marketplace justifications, according to Law360.
The agreement also stipulates that, among other things, BCBS must end its “National Best Efforts Pact,” which requires members to obtain a minimum of two-thirds of their revenues from Blue-branded services, regardless of possible available alternatives.
Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout, terms not sufficient, according to objectors
Plaintiffs who opted out of the settlement agreement claim it does not go far enough to stop BCBS from engaging in poor conduct.
“The defendants have engaged and are still engaging in per se illegal market division and per se illegal output restrictions,” states the class action lawsuit. “The plaintiffs seek to enjoin an ongoing conspiracy between and among the BCBSA and the Blue Plans to allocate markets and impose output restrictions in violation of the prohibitions of the Sherman Act.”
Plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and requesting any legal or equitable relief the court deems just and proper, in addition to the court enjoining BCBS from engaging in antitrust and anti-competitive behavior.
Do you agree that the $2.67 billion settlement is not proper compensation for Blue Cross Blue Shield’s alleged antitrust violations? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by Michael Gulisano of Gulisano Law PLLC.
The Blue Cross Blue Shield settlement payout class action lawsuit is Hoover, et al. v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Association, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-23448, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
292 thoughts on11th Circuit affirms $2.67B Blue Cross antitrust settlement
I have been fighting BCBS forever! Please add me!
I’d like to join because the co pays are ridiculous.
I’ve been fighting bcbsal since Jan 2022. Mp provider is on network according to insurance snd the provider but they reject it once they attempt to submit it. I ask for supporting documents from my plan to verify the accuracy of the denial and I get told that they have no written documentation from my plan to provide me but it does mention *similar word but basically the same but to insurance still inapplicable to my claims. I submitted a reimbursement for that provider and they processed it as out of network but I thought that a service not covered or the ‘type of facility’ denied was not able to be considered at all.??
Anyone have any suggestions for me? Lol
Add me