Emily Sortor  |  May 19, 2020

Category: Electronics

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A Pentax camera class action lawsuit claims that the products are defective.

A camera owner has filed a class action lawsuit against Ricoh USA Inc. over claims that the company’s line of Pentax camera products are defective in a way that causes them to produce useless, almost completely dark photographs.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit was filed by New York resident Janet Kyszenia who says she purchased a Pentax camera for her own personal use.

Allegedly, after she purchased the camera, she discovered that it possessed a defect that made it unusable, because it took extremely dark, almost black photographs.

However, the Pentax repair class action lawsuit asserts that the problem with her camera did not occur until after her camera was out of warranty.

She states that this is a problem that plagues not only her camera, but a large portion of Pentax cameras produced. Allegedly, the problem is the result of a manufacturing flaw or design defect, affecting Pentax K-30, K-50, and K-70 models.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit argues that the defect which causes the cameras to produce black pictures is a problem with the aperture, the opening in a camera lens through which light passes to enter the camera.

Allegedly, many other customers experienced similar problems. To support this point, Kyszenia cites numerous customer complaints about the cameras that she says are similar to her own. She stresses that thousands of customers complained to Ricoh about the aperture problem “to no avail.”

She seeks to represent a Class of all United States customers who purchased a Pentax K-30, K-50, or K-70 model camera for personal use since Dec. 7, 2014. Additionally, she also seeks to establish subclasses of customers who purchased cameras in New York and Virginia in the same time period.

On behalf of herself and these similarly affected customers, Kyszenia seeks damages to compensate for financial injury. She says that she and other customers would not have purchased the camera or would have paid as much as they did for it if they had known that the cameras were defective.

Pentax camera lenses allegedly have a defect which results in dark photos.Allegedly, the cameras themselves cost around $450 each and the additional attachments and accessories cost around $450.

This means that the average Pentax customer spends around $900 on a new Pentax camera, says Kyszenia.

Around 12,000 Pentax cameras were sold, says the Pentax camera aperture problem class action lawsuit, which brought Ricoh Inc. more than $5,000,000 in sales.

The plaintiff says that, despite collecting millions in profits, the company failed its customers in a range of ways. First by putting a defective camera on the market that allegedly the company knew was defective.

The company reportedly had the means and methods necessary to test the camera before it was released into the market, to ensure that the cameras were in good working order.

The camera functionality problem class action lawsuit argues that Ricoh USA, the makers of Pentax cameras, had significant experience from its prominent role in the camera industry. Allegedly, this experience should have been enough to ensure the proper design and manufacturing of the Pentax camera products.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit then goes on to argue that the company further financially injured its customers, challenging the company’s approach to Pentax repair in light of the defect. Though the cameras do come with a warranty, the warranties are allegedly not sufficient to cover Pentax repair for the aperture defect, because the defect often materializes after the warranty ends.

The company further injured customers by not offering Pentax repair after customers complained about their cameras’ defects. Additionally, the company has refused to provide an adequate Pentax repair plan to compensate consumers.

Instead, customers allegedly had to cover the cost of Pentax repair out-of-pocket. The Pentax class action lawsuit asserts that the company should have covered the cost of repairing the cameras, but instead pushed this cost on to its consumers.

In addition to monetary compensation, Kyszenia seeks injunctive relief for herself and the other customers, saying that if she could be assured that Pentax cameras did not possess any more defects, she would purchase a Pentax camera again.

Have you ever used a Pentax camera? Did you have any problems with it? Share your experience in the comments below.

Kyszenia is represented by Spencer Sheehan of Sheehan & Associates PC and by Christopher Colt North of The Consumer & Employee Rights Law Firm PC.

The Pentax Aperture Black Picture Problem Class Action Lawsuit is Janet Kyszenia v. Ricoh USA Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-02215, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


199 thoughts onPentax Camera Class Action Alleges Aperture Defect

  1. Darrin Spondike says:

    I am now having the same issue with my K70 purchased 2018.

  2. Steve Higgins says:

    My K70 is also affected by the aperture block issue. It works fine with a KAF4 lens (electronic aperture control) but all of my older lenses that rely on the mechanical system don’t work properly… pretty much get black images when I use them. I would be really happy if Ricoh would just repair it for free. I think I have taken fewer than 4,000 pictures with this body.

  3. John says:

    My K30 was the first to fail. It was repaired on warranty but failed again.
    My K50 had the same problem. Then I knew one could repair it oneself. It is a tiny part, a solenoid. The forums are full of repair solutions, some just file some part but this is not recommended. Others recommend to replace it with the same part but made in Japan. One can find it in most pre-K30 Pentax bodies (not K5 + K7). A seller on ebay offers it as well. I repaired both my K30 and K50 and they work well. Wasn’t that difficult. Search Pentax + solenoid + manual and you find great tutorials.
    There are tutorials for the K-S1, K-S2 and K-70 repair as well.

  4. Christopher Christensen says:

    Same problem, bought the camera from Hunts Photo

    1. John says:

      Had the same problem but repaired it by myself.
      Search for solenoid pentax manual

  5. PatrickHenryHague says:

    My, K 5 failed, my, K 50 failed I had both of them repaired at my expense. Most of these cameras will fail at some time it is just a matter of when. How could they not know the forums are full of complaints.The digital camera’s are terrific but they all break. I now a KS2 this will most most likely be my last Pentax I bought my first in 1964, a Spotmatic, I have purchased many Pentax camera’s from 110’s to 6X7’s It’s the end of an era for me, too bad. The lawsuit when that happens there will be no more Pentax, how sad.

  6. Michael Hiransomboon says:

    I own 5 Pentax cameras and most have been great. But I do have a K70 that has the aperture block problem. I wish they would step up and take care of this.

  7. Randy Bishop says:

    Spent over 215 dollars to fix my K30, and another 215 dollars to fix my Ks2, both due to the aperture block issue.

  8. David Vaughan says:

    I have a K-30 that also suffers from aperture block failure.

  9. Dan says:

    There are more models affected, K-500, K-S1 and K-S2 also use the same problematic part. By the time the K-S1, K-S2 and K-70 were introduced, the issue was well known by numerous customer complaints, yet Ricoh continued using the same defective part.

  10. Ani says:

    My camera has been sitting in the closet for a few years because of this defect. A waste of over $600.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.