Emily Sortor  |  May 19, 2020

Category: Electronics

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A Pentax camera class action lawsuit claims that the products are defective.

A camera owner has filed a class action lawsuit against Ricoh USA Inc. over claims that the company’s line of Pentax camera products are defective in a way that causes them to produce useless, almost completely dark photographs.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit was filed by New York resident Janet Kyszenia who says she purchased a Pentax camera for her own personal use.

Allegedly, after she purchased the camera, she discovered that it possessed a defect that made it unusable, because it took extremely dark, almost black photographs.

However, the Pentax repair class action lawsuit asserts that the problem with her camera did not occur until after her camera was out of warranty.

She states that this is a problem that plagues not only her camera, but a large portion of Pentax cameras produced. Allegedly, the problem is the result of a manufacturing flaw or design defect, affecting Pentax K-30, K-50, and K-70 models.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit argues that the defect which causes the cameras to produce black pictures is a problem with the aperture, the opening in a camera lens through which light passes to enter the camera.

Allegedly, many other customers experienced similar problems. To support this point, Kyszenia cites numerous customer complaints about the cameras that she says are similar to her own. She stresses that thousands of customers complained to Ricoh about the aperture problem “to no avail.”

She seeks to represent a Class of all United States customers who purchased a Pentax K-30, K-50, or K-70 model camera for personal use since Dec. 7, 2014. Additionally, she also seeks to establish subclasses of customers who purchased cameras in New York and Virginia in the same time period.

On behalf of herself and these similarly affected customers, Kyszenia seeks damages to compensate for financial injury. She says that she and other customers would not have purchased the camera or would have paid as much as they did for it if they had known that the cameras were defective.

Pentax camera lenses allegedly have a defect which results in dark photos.Allegedly, the cameras themselves cost around $450 each and the additional attachments and accessories cost around $450.

This means that the average Pentax customer spends around $900 on a new Pentax camera, says Kyszenia.

Around 12,000 Pentax cameras were sold, says the Pentax camera aperture problem class action lawsuit, which brought Ricoh Inc. more than $5,000,000 in sales.

The plaintiff says that, despite collecting millions in profits, the company failed its customers in a range of ways. First by putting a defective camera on the market that allegedly the company knew was defective.

The company reportedly had the means and methods necessary to test the camera before it was released into the market, to ensure that the cameras were in good working order.

The camera functionality problem class action lawsuit argues that Ricoh USA, the makers of Pentax cameras, had significant experience from its prominent role in the camera industry. Allegedly, this experience should have been enough to ensure the proper design and manufacturing of the Pentax camera products.

The Pentax camera class action lawsuit then goes on to argue that the company further financially injured its customers, challenging the company’s approach to Pentax repair in light of the defect. Though the cameras do come with a warranty, the warranties are allegedly not sufficient to cover Pentax repair for the aperture defect, because the defect often materializes after the warranty ends.

The company further injured customers by not offering Pentax repair after customers complained about their cameras’ defects. Additionally, the company has refused to provide an adequate Pentax repair plan to compensate consumers.

Instead, customers allegedly had to cover the cost of Pentax repair out-of-pocket. The Pentax class action lawsuit asserts that the company should have covered the cost of repairing the cameras, but instead pushed this cost on to its consumers.

In addition to monetary compensation, Kyszenia seeks injunctive relief for herself and the other customers, saying that if she could be assured that Pentax cameras did not possess any more defects, she would purchase a Pentax camera again.

Have you ever used a Pentax camera? Did you have any problems with it? Share your experience in the comments below.

Kyszenia is represented by Spencer Sheehan of Sheehan & Associates PC and by Christopher Colt North of The Consumer & Employee Rights Law Firm PC.

The Pentax Aperture Black Picture Problem Class Action Lawsuit is Janet Kyszenia v. Ricoh USA Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-02215, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


199 thoughts onPentax Camera Class Action Alleges Aperture Defect

  1. Bi Haley says:

    Have the same problem with my K50

  2. Philippe Perrault says:

    I had a K-30 camera with this problem, then, as it was out of warranty, i replaced by a K-50 (i couldn’t imagine pentax had push a known problem throught several models). now my K-50 presents this same failure. Pentax answers it has worked fine several years and that is ok for them.
    I don’t think i can join this class action as i am in France, but i’d like to collect the conclusion to argue with Pentax France.
    Is this class action judged ? where can i find the final judgment ?

  3. Katherine says:

    K-50 Pentax with exact same issue. Sad, they will lose a lot of business. I have 3 Pentax cameras. And will be looking at other cameras in the future

  4. Theresa Tarara says:

    I have a ks2 I bought in 2018 and have the same issue. Out of warranty and started getting dark pics. Spent around 730.00 on this camera. I’m very sad and angry.

  5. Joe Tinoco says:

    Have a K-30 with the same problem. I wanted the camera for use in the rain and it did that well, but now is useless. Would have just stuck with Canon had I known.

1 17 18 19

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.