Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
T-Mobile, Sprint merger class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: A group of Verizon and AT&T subscribers filed a class action lawsuit against T-Mobile, Deutsche Telekom AG and SoftBank Group Corp.
- Why: Verizon and AT&T subscribers claim the April 2020 merger between T-Mobile and Sprint was anticompetitive and injured them financially.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Illinois federal court.
The April 2020 merger between T-Mobile and Sprint was an anticompetitive acquisition and collectively cost U.S. small businesses and AT&T and Verizon subscribers billions of dollars, a new class action lawsuit alleges.
A group of AT&T and Verizon subscribers claim the merger “combined two fierce competitors into a single behemoth with no incentive to compete meaningfully” against the “equally large” Verizon and AT&T.
Subscribers claim it was always T-Mobile’s long-term plan to merge with another wireless carrier to create “the best path to extracting every possible cent from American consumers and small businesses.”
T-Mobile class action claims number of states attempted to prevent merger
Fourteen states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the companies in an attempt to prevent the merger after it was announced in April 2018, according to the T-Mobile class action.
At the time, the states argued the merger would reduce competition and result in at least $9 billion worth of harm to consumers each year.
After the lawsuit from the states failed to stop the merger, subscribers claim, T-Mobile and Sprint would merge to become “a single large competitor that is more than happy to observe a competitive détente in return for stable market shares and prices.”
Since the merger, subscribers argue competition has “declined precipitously” and that quality-adjusted prices have inflated since T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon have “no reason to compete as vigorously for subscribers.”
Subscribers claim T-Mobile, Deutsche Telekom AG and SoftBank Group Corp violate the Clayton Act and Sherman Act.
The subscribers want to represent a nationwide class of all persons or entities who paid for a Verizon or AT&T mobile wireless plan on or after April 1, 2020.
They demand a jury trial and request declaratory relief along with treble damages for themselves and all Class Members.
In related news, earlier this month, T-Mobile, Sprint and Verizon deployed vertical location technology to help 911 responders pinpoint the location of a call coming from a multistory building.
Have your wireless rates increased since the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by the Law Offices Of Kenneth N. Flaxman PC, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Berger Montague and Hausfeld LLP.
The T-Mobile and Sprint merger class action lawsuit is Dale, et al. v. Deutsche Telekom AG, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-03189, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- T-Mobile class action alleges 5G network launch leaves some customers without service
- Verizon report says human error leading factor in data breaches
- Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile deploy 911 technology to ID callers’ floor location
- Parker Hannifin Class Action Alleges March Data Breach Caused by Lapsed Security
936 thoughts onT-Mobile class action claims Sprint merger costs Verizon, AT&T customers due to declining competition
Well add me. I’m from sprint to t-mobile
I’ve have sprint then forced into T-Mobile. for over 16 years now Verizon because if everything and had to pay so much money. So disappointed in the exchange.
Just found out my information was breached. Its on my discovery statement that my security number is on the dark web from a security breach on t mobile
I was with sprint now T-Mobile. Just found out my informative was breached. Its on my discovery statement that my security number is on the datk wen from a security breach on t mobile . I have documentation. Please add me
I had T Mobile service during the leak. And during my usual credit monitoring and was informed that there was 6 hits on the black web with my email and social security number.
I have been a customer for t mobile over 8 years. And I was never informed about this matter.
Please add me to the law I did receive a email from them that they had a breach and my name and information was taken and now my information is being sold on the dark web some thing like that?
Please add me I got a letter in the mail saying my info was taken and offer to pay for a year of credit mounting
Just found out my informative was breached. Its on my discovery statement that my security number is on the datk wen from a security breach on t mobile . I have documentation. Please add me
Dana Seward
Please add me I got a letter in the mail saying my info was taken
Add me
I’m 66 years old I went to T-Mobile to get a better price and my phone bill has been slowly but surely creeping Lee increased every month. I was promised $50 a month then it keeps adding on taxes and late fees because I can’t pay my bill at the end of the month
Add me