Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
T-Mobile, Sprint merger class action lawsuit overview:
- Who: A group of Verizon and AT&T subscribers filed a class action lawsuit against T-Mobile, Deutsche Telekom AG and SoftBank Group Corp.
- Why: Verizon and AT&T subscribers claim the April 2020 merger between T-Mobile and Sprint was anticompetitive and injured them financially.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Illinois federal court.
The April 2020 merger between T-Mobile and Sprint was an anticompetitive acquisition and collectively cost U.S. small businesses and AT&T and Verizon subscribers billions of dollars, a new class action lawsuit alleges.
A group of AT&T and Verizon subscribers claim the merger “combined two fierce competitors into a single behemoth with no incentive to compete meaningfully” against the “equally large” Verizon and AT&T.
Subscribers claim it was always T-Mobile’s long-term plan to merge with another wireless carrier to create “the best path to extracting every possible cent from American consumers and small businesses.”
T-Mobile class action claims number of states attempted to prevent merger
Fourteen states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the companies in an attempt to prevent the merger after it was announced in April 2018, according to the T-Mobile class action.
At the time, the states argued the merger would reduce competition and result in at least $9 billion worth of harm to consumers each year.
After the lawsuit from the states failed to stop the merger, subscribers claim, T-Mobile and Sprint would merge to become “a single large competitor that is more than happy to observe a competitive détente in return for stable market shares and prices.”
Since the merger, subscribers argue competition has “declined precipitously” and that quality-adjusted prices have inflated since T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon have “no reason to compete as vigorously for subscribers.”
Subscribers claim T-Mobile, Deutsche Telekom AG and SoftBank Group Corp violate the Clayton Act and Sherman Act.
The subscribers want to represent a nationwide class of all persons or entities who paid for a Verizon or AT&T mobile wireless plan on or after April 1, 2020.
They demand a jury trial and request declaratory relief along with treble damages for themselves and all Class Members.
In related news, earlier this month, T-Mobile, Sprint and Verizon deployed vertical location technology to help 911 responders pinpoint the location of a call coming from a multistory building.
Have your wireless rates increased since the merger between T-Mobile and Sprint? Let us know in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by the Law Offices Of Kenneth N. Flaxman PC, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Berger Montague and Hausfeld LLP.
The T-Mobile and Sprint merger class action lawsuit is Dale, et al. v. Deutsche Telekom AG, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-03189, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- T-Mobile class action alleges 5G network launch leaves some customers without service
- Verizon report says human error leading factor in data breaches
- Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile deploy 911 technology to ID callers’ floor location
- Parker Hannifin Class Action Alleges March Data Breach Caused by Lapsed Security
936 thoughts onT-Mobile class action claims Sprint merger costs Verizon, AT&T customers due to declining competition
Please add me
Add me
My identity was stolen due to tmobile and one person is using mu identity for his drivers license what can I do
Please add me to the settlement
I wanted to keep the phone I had, but was given no choice but to exchange/purchase a TMobile phone because my old phone would not be serviced by T-Mobile after a certain date. I “had” to buy/rent a TMobile phone! My plan was going to be cheaper and it is not! No surprise there. Shame on you T-Mobile!
Lauren P.
Please add me to CALS
I’m always having to contact Sprint/T-Mobile for all kinds of problems. I paid off my iPhone 12 but they are still charging me $25 a month. I tried to resolve this problem with them but they want me to do the leg work. I’m also on the auto pay but for the last 2 months they didn’t take the money out, I had to call them and remind them. I shouldn’t have to do that since I’m on auto pay. I also had to buy the 14 pro Max just so I could get reception! None of their promos come without a glitch of having to pay something extra somewhere. They do often give me a credit but I don’t want a credit! I just want my phone to work right! And the Magenta plan is outrageous! But if I want my phone to work right I have to carry it on all 3 of my lines.
I got a T-Mobile phone I thought it would be a very good discount but it ended up costing me a lot of money to keep it going and I almost wanted to keep it off the minutes didn’t roll over or nothing it’s very upset please add me to the settlement
Plz add me
Add me
Yes pls add me
Yes please add me, just this Friday USA gutters came to my house and worked on my roof without my permission. I called their office and left a message. No response, no knock on my door to verify anything. I don’t know why they installed a seamless gutter on my roof and there must’ve been no observation because the roof needs replacing. I replaced the front side. If I had wanted it I would of fixed the roof first and I can’t afford it I never ordered it. There was no obvious confirmation from me. I assume they went to the wrong house.