Brigette Honaker  |  November 28, 2018

Category: Beverages

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

coffee-mate creamer contains trans fat

According to a recent Coffee-mate class action lawsuit, the coffee creamer contains trans fat despite representations that it does not.

Plaintiff Mark Beasley says he buys Coffee-mate creamers at least once a month.

However, in January 2017, the Coffee-mate class action claims Beasley realized the creamer actually contained trans fat and had been “fraudulently marketed.”

Coffee-mate creamers allegedly contain an additive known as partially hydrogenated oil.

In June 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued regulations regarding partial hydrogenated oil, declaring the additive unsafe for any use in food.

The Coffee-mate class action says PHO, which is a trans fat, is reportedly dangerous to cardiovascular health, prompting the FDA’s regulations.

However, Beasley claims that there was scientific evidence that partially hydrogenated oil was not safe before the FDA’s 2015 declaration. In 2011, a Harvard researcher came to the conclusion that making food with partially hydrogenated oil is “a food safety issue […] this is actually contamination.”

The Coffee-mate creamer class action says scientific evidence shows that trans fat found in products like partially hydrogenated oil can have a variety of health consequences including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and accelerated memory damage and cognitive decline.

“Doctors’ associations such as the American Heart Association, and learned societies such as the National Academies of Science, found that the addition of trans fat to the American diet by causing tens of thousands excess deaths per year, and worked to publicize these findings,” the Coffee-mate class action claims. “Nestle was well aware of these dangers, but choose not to follow its food industry peers in immediately removing trans fat from its products.”

The plaintiff argues that Coffee-mate manufacturers knew or should have known about the risks of using partially hydrogenated oil in their products, but chose to not accurately report their usage to consumers.

Instead, the company allegedly advertises their claim of “0g Trans Fat” prominently on Coffee-mate products’ labels.

“This language was part of an intentional, long-term campaign to deceptively market Coffee-mate as healthful and free of trans fat,” the Coffee-mate class action argues.

Beasley says that the manufacturers’ claims are “unlawful and deceptive” as the products do contain trans fat in the form of partially hydrogenated oil. These unfair claims allegedly violate several California laws including the California Unfair Competition Law.

The Coffee-mate class action claims that Nestle’s actions are made worse by several facts. First, International Delight, Nestle’s largest competitor, has made their coffee creamers without adding trans fat for years.

Several smaller brands have also accomplished this, meaning that there is allegedly no reason that Nestle could not have also accomplished making Coffee-mate products without partially hydrogenated oil.

Beasley seeks to represent a Class of all California consumers who purchased Coffee-mate products on or after Jan. 1, 2010. He also seeks to represent a subclass of California consumers who, on or after Jan. 1, 2010, purchased Coffee-mate products containing the claim “0g Trans Fat.”

The Coffee-mate class action lawsuit seeks, restitution, court costs, and attorneys’ fees.

The Coffee-mate class action was originally filed in California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco but was removed to federal court on Nov. 26.

Beasley and the proposed Class are represented by Gregory S. Weston and Andrew C. Hamilton of The Weston Firm.

The Coffee-mate Creamer Trans Fat Class Action Lawsuit is Beasley v. Lucky Stores Inc., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-07144-JSC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

UPDATE: On Jan. 24, 2020, Plaintiffs have overcome a bid to dismiss a Coffee-mate Creamer trans fat class action lawsuit alleging Nestle and others lied about the contents of their product.  


We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

2,277 thoughts onCoffee-mate Class Action Lawsuit Says Creamer Contains Trans Fat

  1. Andrea Golub says:

    I have been using coffee mate every day for as long as I can remember. Please include me in the class action lawsuit.

  2. Merrill A Dellas says:

    Add me! Used in one way or another for YEARS!

  3. Laurie Jaster says:

    PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR LIST FOR THE COFFEE MATE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT! I have been drinking the Hazelnut flavored coffee creamer for at least 15 years! I’ve had stomach issues and I’m now 64 years old and having a harder time controlling my weight. I have an appointment with my heart doctor at the end of this month!!

  4. Janet says:

    I’ve been drinking it for about a year and soon enough I had pain at the top of my abdomen. I’m going in for a checkup .

  5. Debra Clark says:

    I have been using coffeemate sugar free creamer for several years. As of 3 1/2 years ago I had barbaric surgery and when it was ok I went back to the sugar free creamer with my coffee and couldn’t figure out why I had put quite a few pounds back on because I wasn’t eating any high carb foods, no whites or sugar and thought something was wrong with me…..I consulted with my PHP and she told me that the creamer, even though it says “NO” trans fat on the label, that in fact it does have hydrogenated oil in it which translates to “trans fat”. And that they get away with putting 0g trans fat on the label because the serving size is small enough that it doesn’t mandate them to list any on their nutrition information which is pretty pathetic and lousy. I am disgusted by the fact I have been deceived and was deceptive against and ruined the whole premise of getting the surgery to begin with to control my other health issues. Something needs to be done!!!!!!

  6. Gail Barton says:

    Please add me to your list. I have been drinking coffee mate hazelnut every day for several years now and am having health problems!

  7. M i v says:

    Omg. I changed from milk to the coffee creamer who knows for how long, but i guess it has been more than 20 years ago. I was wondering why my cholesterol was going up and keeping it up even when i was exercising. Then now I got so many health problems mainly with high blood pressure. I did not know until this year that my daughter told me about it.

  8. Raphaella Daggett says:

    Please include me in this informational list regarding the coffee mate lawsuit

  9. Tamra Dickerson says:

    I would like to know if Nestle has continued to add trans fat to their creamer despite that the bottle says there is none ?

    1. Barbara Lyttle says:

      I have bern using Coffee Mate for years and have been diagnosed with Diabetes

  10. Michelle McKinnon says:

    Coconut Cream / vanilla since it became available. Too many medical issues to share here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.