Anne Bucher  |  October 13, 2022

Category: Lawsuit Settlements

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Rite Aid lidocaine class action lawsuit overview:

  • Who: Plaintiff Steven Prescott filed a class action lawsuit against Rite Aid Corporation.
  • Why: Rite Aid allegedly falsely advertises its lidocaine patches as “Maximum Strength.”
  • Where: The Rite Aid class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court.

Rite Aid Corporation joins the list of companies facing allegations of misrepresenting the strength of its over-the-counter lidocaine patches.

On Oct. 6, the pharmacy chain was hit with a class action lawsuit in California federal court alleging over-the-counter Rite Aid lidocaine patches are represented as “Maximum Strength” even though prescription products contain a higher percentage of lidocaine.

Lidocaine is a type of local anesthetic that relieves pain by blocking the signals at the nerve endings in the skin, the Rite Aid class action lawsuit explains. It is commonly used in pain relief products intended to help with soreness and pain.

Rite Aid class action alleges ‘Maximum Strength’ lidocaine patches do not contain maximum available dose

Plaintiff Steven Prescott alleges Rite Aid has developed a marketing campaign meant to appeal to consumers who seek out strong doses of lidocaine to relieve their pain. By touting the Rite Aid lidocaine patches as “Maximum Strength,” reasonable consumers are led to believe that they are purchasing the highest dosage available, the Rite Aid class action lawsuit says.

Prescott says he purchased Rite Aid lidocaine products many times in the last few years. Prior to purchasing the pain relief products, he says he reviewed the labels, disclosures, warranties, and marketing materials, including the prominent “Maximum Strength” representations on the product’s front label.

The Rite Aid class action lawsuit claims that the “Maximum Strength” language on the product’s front label “instantly catches the eye” of consumers and entices them to pay a premium for the product because they believe it contains the highest available dose of lidocaine.

However, the “Maximum Strength” Rite Aid lidocaine products allegedly contain only 4% lidocaine while prescription lidocaine products contain 5% lidocaine, Prescott says.

Therefore, he says the Rite Aid lidocaine products are not actually “Maximum Strength” because stronger lidocaine products are available.

Prescott says he would not have purchased the Rite Aid lidocaine products or would have paid less for them had he known they were falsely advertised as being “Maximum Strength.”

The Rite Aid class action lawsuit asserts claims for violations of California’s False Advertising Law, Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies act, common law fraud, and unjust enrichment.

Several companies are facing lidocaine patch class action lawsuits over allegations they misrepresent the strength of their products.

Have you purchased “Maximum Strength” lidocaine patches because you believed they contained the maximum available dose? Tell us what you think about the Rite Aid class action lawsuit in the comments!

Prescott is represented by Jonathan Shub and Kevin Kaukatis of Shub Law Firm LLC, Trenton R. Kashima of Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC, and Charles E. Schaffer and David C. Magagna Jr. of Levin Sedran & Berman LLP.

The Rite Aid Lidocaine Class Action Lawsuit is Steven Prescott v. Rite Aid Corporation, Case No. 5:22-cv-05798, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

26 thoughts onRite Aid class action alleges retailer falsely advertises lidocaine patch strength

  1. Mo Day says:

    Add me
    I quit buying due to not working as I thought strength was misleading

  2. Michelle Bennett says:

    Add me please

  3. K Hanson says:

    So tired of spending huge sums of money on products that contain deceptive advertising and don’t work. Please add me.

  4. MICHELLE Kitts says:

    Please add me

  5. Trudy Winkler says:

    Add me

  6. Lani Dias says:

    It is so typical of all the medically invented products that we are perscribed to use
    and have become so dependant upon using thinking it was perscribed by a doctor you trust to help you. Its a vicious circle of life the medical world becomes wealthier off of the sick and weak by selling products that do more harm than good for us. Please add me to your list.

  7. Mark Hubinger says:

    Add me also. They dont stay on long enough.

  8. Vanessa Jones says:

    Please add I have brought many boxes of this product and they never stay on and thought I was doing something thing wrong

  9. Cara says:

    Pls add me

  10. Roxanne Argo says:

    Add me

    1. DORIS FREDENDALL says:

      ADD ME PLEASE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.