Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Vivint mandatory training class action lawsuit lawyers have launched an investigation into whether or not the company adequately compensated employees who underwent seminars, lectures or other meetings in order to continue on their jobs.
The Department of Labor has established a four-step procedure for determining whether or not such activities must be considered as part of a worker’s hourly pay. In order for it to be uncompensated, “it is outside normal, it is voluntary, not job related, and no other work is concurrently performed,” according to a fact sheet discussing hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Just as companies cannot ask employees to clock out for breaks or before their shift is done, any mandatory training that does not meet all of those four standards must also be included in a worker’s pay. It is believed that Vivint may have possibly not done so in certain instances regarding its training. It is also possible that travel costs may have been incurred above and beyond those accounted for by the FLSA and Department of Labor regulations.
Vivint is a company with international operations that began as a home security company in 1997. It has expanded to provide home automation related to home security as well as solar panel installation in California and other states.
However, the company has also been linked to unpaid training class action lawsuits before. It was accused of robocalling cellular phones in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in two separate Vivint class action lawsuits, and the company has also either been charged or settled lawsuits regarding deceptive marketing practices or fined for code violations by 14 states.
The potential Vivint lawsuits would be similar to unpaid wage class action lawsuits regarding misclassification of workers as either exempt or subject to a tipped wage when they are not performing those kinds of duties. However, many people are only becoming aware more recently of the full scope of their rights as workers, including pay for mandatory training.
Join a Free Vivint Training Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
If you underwent training with Vivint within the past four years and were not paid for your time, you can participate in a free class action lawsuit investigation. Learn more and obtain a free case evaluation at the Vivint Training Class Action Lawsuit Investigation.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
130 thoughts onNo Pay for Mandatory Training May Lead to Vivint Class Action Lawsuit
I invested money in the company “VEZT” (www.vezt.co) where fans could invest in music artists / song royalties. It was def all just a BIG scam and I never received any compensation. It looks like they finally closed their doors in 2019… in any event everyone who invested definitely needs to receive settlement funds! Please help… thank you!
I believe that the Retail store “At Home Store” is using deceptive sale practices. I currently bought patio cushions which were advertised at 50% off regular price. The regular price on the tag was 29.99. When the cashiers cashed me out the product rang up 19.99 instead if 14.99. I paid the 19.99 and left the store. I went back a few days later to purchase a couple more I seen they had taken the price tag off that had 50% and the tag that said 29.99. I think this deceptive practice is a widely spread practice through this retail company. I have proof of the items that I bought where it shows the deceptive.
Minni Cooper motor got on fire while driving without a warning
Peacock has been charging me for over a year and I do not have a subscription
I had a student loan serviced by Nelnet, I got emails regarding refinancing with Laurel Road. There was no indication that by switching to them the loan would not be treated as a student loan and afforded eligibility for loan forgiveness or cancellation. I’m eligible for cancellation had I not switched. That was not. Made clear.
Lyft pings exact location of where you are. Since riding Lyft I have been getting strange people ringing my doorbell. I live in an apartment and I only put the address and no apartment # so that I will be picked up in front of the complex. Lyft pin point your apt # and now the drivers are waiting outside my door and this morning the actual driver was waking up to my door as I was walking out. This is a concern.
That is way too scary and way too dangerous end it could lead to severe violence if someone with mental health issues just happens to work for Lyft somethings should be changed about that immediately before someone gets hurt because they can come back and wait for you at another time and it is just too tempting for rapists and creeps all around!!
Fluidmaster,
misleading product packaging advertising, too much advertising fluff, no disclaimer, nothing on package redirecting consumer to read the back Fluidmaster 502 flapper, chlorine resistant, is not chlorine resistant. Rather it’s resistant to city chlorinated water, not chlorine as stated on front of the package.
5 yr. warranty will not cover….
Minute loan centers. are consistently charging past accounts due from 2020 even after info sent to collections. pandemic resolution not offered
US Auto advertise on the dail $500 down payments just to get there & pays $5000 down
Hyland’s Restful Legs, contains ARSENIC