Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

BMW Auto Start Stop System defectA putative class action lawsuit was filed Monday against the luxury performance vehicle manufacturer BMW of North America LLC. Allegations in the lawsuit focus on the N63B4400 eight-cylinder engine (more commonly known as the N63).

According to plaintiff Scott Crockett, the N63 engine has serious defects including excessive burning of oil and battery consumption. He further alleges that BMW has taken insufficient measures in an attempt to remediate the problem, by attempting to cover it up rather than deal with it directly.

A visit to any online BMW enthusiast community will quickly show what members think of the N63 engine. The same complaints raised by the plaintiff in the class action lawsuit are mentioned there, much to the disappointment of the brand’s performance car enthusiasts. Compared to similar vehicles with other engines, those with the N63 engines appear to continually disappoint.

Apparently BMW is aware of the shortcomings brought forth in the class action lawsuit, as they have allegedly issued service bulletins to BMW service technicians performing warranty-covered maintenance under BMW’s Standard Maintenance Program. One such bulletin regarding the N63 engine states, “However, in a quest to ensure total customer satisfaction, please replace the 12-volt battery on a preventive maintenance basis at every engine oil service … unless the battery was replaced within the last 12 months.”

Another service bulletin allegedly instructs technicians to add double the oil than originally recommended. According to the BMW class action lawsuit, these remedies are simply being used to mask the engine defect, possibly until the 48-month or 50,000-mile warranty has concluded.

In addition to the service bulletins issued for known engine defects, the BMW class action lawsuit maintains that the “N63 Customer Care Package” is another way to gloss over the problems without addressing them directly. This care package offered customers additional inspection and replacement of other engine parts, even beyond the initial warranty. It also reduced the amount of time between services, from the initial 2-year interval to a yearly oil change. The “N63 Customer Loyalty Offer” provided customers with discounts if they were unhappy with their vehicle and wished to replace it. Lastly, the customer care package allowed dealerships to provide those who purchased the vehicle up to $50 in BMW merchandise and/or accessories.

In what some purchasers have dubbed a lemon, vehicles with the N63 engine also apparently suffer from diminished resale value. When resale buyers are looking at reviews on potential purchases, the BMWs with the N63 engine are a hard sell.

Four counts are brought against BMW in the class action lawsuit: violation of the Manguson-Moss Warranty Act, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability and violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act.

The BMW class action lawsuit seeks to certify three Classes: a nationwide Class of tens of thousands, a Magnuson-Moss Class (for the Manguson-Moss act violation in select states) in the thousands, and a Kansas Class of BMW buyers in the hundreds.

As for relief from damages, the BMW class action lawsuit states, “Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of the Magnuson-Moss or Kansas Classes, seeks all damages permitted by law, including compensation for the monetary difference between N63 vehicles as warranted and as sold; compensation for the reduction in resale value; compensation for out-of-pocket repairs and service; towing charges incurred due to N63 vehicle breakdowns; the cost of purchasing, leasing, or renting replacement vehicles, along with all other incidental and consequential damages, statutory attorney fees, and all other relief allowed by law.”

The plaintiff is represented by Eric D. Barton, Tyler W. Hudson and David P. Barclay of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP.

The BMW N63 Engine Class Action Lawsuit is Crockett v. BMW of North America LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-09266, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

UPDATE: On December 31, 2015, the BMW N63 Engine class action lawsuit was dismissed at the voluntary request of the plaintiff.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


57 thoughts onBMW N63 V-8 Engine Is Defective, Class Action Lawsuit Alleges

  1. Ted says:

    Look at the history and maintenance requirements of German WWII military vehicles, aircraft and tanks. They did not have enough personnel to support the maintenance demands. These cars are not built for our type of driving. These are Autobahn cruisers. I have a Porsche Turbo, 600-800 miles on quart of oil. They rushed this design to try to leapfrog the competition. Just purchased a used 550i. Will only drive about 4k-5k miles a year. Buy battery futures!

  2. John Frketich says:

    2010 550i GT. 1 qt a week. Burning more oil than gas. same thing round & round. Dealer, Its normal???Disappointing

  3. Javier says:

    No one has replied with how to get involved in this lawsuit. Any replies please? I think we’re all very upset with how are vehicles are running, and deserve to be in this.

  4. Scott Moore says:

    I too have an x6 N63 engine that burns oil like there is no tomorrow. Any word on how to get involved with this CAS?

  5. Ieda De Jesus says:

    (Continued) Other issues besides the N63 engine with my 2012 650i: rear wheel cracking, excessive oil burning, back passengers windows randomly not closing, replacement of tires twice in less than 5 months. During 30 day repair at BMW Dealer they replaced two of my cracked catalytic converters, all spark plugs (which they replaced again 3 months later), seal valves etc. I have been a BMW patron for over a decade and had no problems with my Z4 for 11 years. The 2012 650i series is a lemon and if you do your research on BMW forums and YouTube the Drivetrain Malfunction / engine issues occurs with used cars at any mileage and with brand new cars having as little as 100 miles on them. BMW is knowingly selling defective cars and taking advantage of American consumers.

  6. Ieda De Jesus says:

    Was offered a buy back from BMW, NA for my 2012 650i purchased CPO (certified preowned). Very unhappy since they deducted mileage fees, part of the California Lemon Law. BMW knowing is selling defective cars and should compensate buyers fully. N63 engines cause Drivetrain Malfunction which is a safety hazard since it causes sudden deceleration of the vehicle while driving on the freeway at speeds of approximately 60 mph or more. I encourage all 650i or N63 owners to report this to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at NHTSA.dot.gov . The BMW with N63 is a huge safety hazard and may lead to fatalities.

  7. Nazar Y says:

    I have the same issue with my bmw 750li 2010 it smokes and eats oil like crazy. The valve seals need to be changed at 120,000km, seriously? how do i join the suit?

  8. Brandy J says:

    How to I become part of the suit? Been going round and round with BMW.

  9. Brandy J says:

    How do I join this suit? I have been going round and round with both BMW USA and the dealership on the repairs. The car bought used just a year ago is worth $15,000 less now. They want even help me get into another BMW.

    1. Kp says:

      Publicity

  10. Deborah says:

    In April bought a 2012 6 series, just took it in because of not starting correctly and it seemed to be running rich. They told us that BMW is aware of this problem and will be replacing the parts free of charge. I do not know why they have to wait for a customer to complain when their cars are very expense to start with.

1 2 3 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.