Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

BMW Auto Start Stop System defectA putative class action lawsuit was filed Monday against the luxury performance vehicle manufacturer BMW of North America LLC. Allegations in the lawsuit focus on the N63B4400 eight-cylinder engine (more commonly known as the N63).

According to plaintiff Scott Crockett, the N63 engine has serious defects including excessive burning of oil and battery consumption. He further alleges that BMW has taken insufficient measures in an attempt to remediate the problem, by attempting to cover it up rather than deal with it directly.

A visit to any online BMW enthusiast community will quickly show what members think of the N63 engine. The same complaints raised by the plaintiff in the class action lawsuit are mentioned there, much to the disappointment of the brand’s performance car enthusiasts. Compared to similar vehicles with other engines, those with the N63 engines appear to continually disappoint.

Apparently BMW is aware of the shortcomings brought forth in the class action lawsuit, as they have allegedly issued service bulletins to BMW service technicians performing warranty-covered maintenance under BMW’s Standard Maintenance Program. One such bulletin regarding the N63 engine states, “However, in a quest to ensure total customer satisfaction, please replace the 12-volt battery on a preventive maintenance basis at every engine oil service … unless the battery was replaced within the last 12 months.”

Another service bulletin allegedly instructs technicians to add double the oil than originally recommended. According to the BMW class action lawsuit, these remedies are simply being used to mask the engine defect, possibly until the 48-month or 50,000-mile warranty has concluded.

In addition to the service bulletins issued for known engine defects, the BMW class action lawsuit maintains that the “N63 Customer Care Package” is another way to gloss over the problems without addressing them directly. This care package offered customers additional inspection and replacement of other engine parts, even beyond the initial warranty. It also reduced the amount of time between services, from the initial 2-year interval to a yearly oil change. The “N63 Customer Loyalty Offer” provided customers with discounts if they were unhappy with their vehicle and wished to replace it. Lastly, the customer care package allowed dealerships to provide those who purchased the vehicle up to $50 in BMW merchandise and/or accessories.

In what some purchasers have dubbed a lemon, vehicles with the N63 engine also apparently suffer from diminished resale value. When resale buyers are looking at reviews on potential purchases, the BMWs with the N63 engine are a hard sell.

Four counts are brought against BMW in the class action lawsuit: violation of the Manguson-Moss Warranty Act, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability and violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act.

The BMW class action lawsuit seeks to certify three Classes: a nationwide Class of tens of thousands, a Magnuson-Moss Class (for the Manguson-Moss act violation in select states) in the thousands, and a Kansas Class of BMW buyers in the hundreds.

As for relief from damages, the BMW class action lawsuit states, “Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of the Magnuson-Moss or Kansas Classes, seeks all damages permitted by law, including compensation for the monetary difference between N63 vehicles as warranted and as sold; compensation for the reduction in resale value; compensation for out-of-pocket repairs and service; towing charges incurred due to N63 vehicle breakdowns; the cost of purchasing, leasing, or renting replacement vehicles, along with all other incidental and consequential damages, statutory attorney fees, and all other relief allowed by law.”

The plaintiff is represented by Eric D. Barton, Tyler W. Hudson and David P. Barclay of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP.

The BMW N63 Engine Class Action Lawsuit is Crockett v. BMW of North America LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-09266, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

UPDATE: On December 31, 2015, the BMW N63 Engine class action lawsuit was dismissed at the voluntary request of the plaintiff.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


57 thoughts onBMW N63 V-8 Engine Is Defective, Class Action Lawsuit Alleges

  1. Michael says:

    Since the class action has been dropped can it be picked back up?
    I naught my Black on Black 650i Convertible a year and a half ago. I thought I was buying my dream car, instead I bought someone else’s disappointment. I’ve owned five BMW’s, 79 320i, 635, 633 csi 2001 530i and guess what I had no problems with them. I am so heartbroken over this car, I want my money back… Help what do I do can anyone help?

  2. JC Dragatsis says:

    2010 750il xdrive, 60,540 miles and the car has been for 6 weeks, BMW dealer in Sarasota. Everything described is what has happened, I have the extended warrenty and so far the tab is at over $20k…..they offered me $21,500 for trade in……this is absurd. The dealer said this is very common and that I am one of the lucky ones having the warrenty. I’m dumping the car as soon as possible. It’s too bad because the car is mint, never would have thought a $100k car would crap out at 60,000 miles. Just got the car back Friday, on Saturday the car was stalling, tach bobbing, smoke again and even worse than when I brought it in……going back in on Monday, again. I told them this should be covered under the N63 Customer Care “Recall” Package BMW issued on this engine. Dealer said they will discuss with me on Monday. Time to talk to my Attorney.

  3. Top Class Actions says:

    UPDATE: On December 31, 2015, the BMW N63 Engine class action lawsuit was dismissed at the voluntary request of the plaintiff.

  4. Tommie says:

    I just got jammed by the dealership I bought my 2011 X6 2 years ago. They gave me an estimate for $12k and said it was normal wear and tear. I am heartbroken…cant pay it. thought this would take me into retirement with no payments and be reliable…I am going to contact an attorney to deal with this very dishonorable matter.

  5. Sheldon Mayrant says:

    How do I join

  6. Luis says:

    What if you leased.

  7. DA says:

    If this is being refilled, does anyone know how to get involved? I have a 2011 CPO 550i, which the injectors have been replaced five times. In addition, the car burns oil. There were three other significant issues with the car, in which an extended warranty, free of charge, was added (10 years or 120,000). However, BMW NA will not add the same extended warranty to the injector issue. According to BMW NA, five times (in five years) in acceptable and since the CPO has covered this problem so far there is nothing more they need to do to help me.

    1. DA says:

      Sorry I meant to say *refiled*

  8. Joe says:

    I heard this is being refiled in NJ where the laws are more favorable to the plaintiffs.

  9. Lex says:

    Hi Brany J, Im in the same predicament with my 2012 550i. I am going back & forth to the dealership & have spoken with BMW NA, both have denied me of a buy back. Im am currently working with a Lemon Law attorney to help me settle this. Fortunately, I bought a extended warranty to cover for all of the issues with my engine but has been in the dealership for more than 8 times. I suggest talking to a lawyer.

  10. jason says:

    Looks like this is going no where, class action was dismissed voluntarily.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.