Christina Spicer  |  February 4, 2019

Category: Food

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

A Target customer claims that its store brand Market Pantry Graham Crackers do not contain enough graham flour to be considered graham crackers.

Lead plaintiff Freddie Jamison says boxes of Target brand graham and honey graham crackers create an impression that graham flour is the main ingredient in the product.

Jamison alleges that he and other consumers rely on products’ packaging to make an informed decision when spending their hard-earned money.

“The representations of the Products as ‘graham crackers’ is misleading, false, deceptive and unfair,” contends the Target class action lawsuit. “This is because the predominant flour in [it] is not graham flour but refined, white flour (‘unbleached enriched flour’), indicated on the ingredient list, reproduced below, in minuscule font below the nutrition facts on the side panel.”

According to the Target class action lawsuit, graham flour is “a coarse-ground, whole wheat flour, made from the whole grain – the endosperm, germ, and bran.” Enriched white flour, by contrast, is made of refined grains.

“Consumers increasingly seek products containing whole grains for its numerous health benefits, as it is associated with lower risk of several diseases and conditions, while refined flour is not,” argues the Target graham crackers class action.

The plaintiff accuses Target of misleading consumers into thinking they are purchasing a healthier product, leading them to pay more than they otherwise would.

The Target class action lawsuit says that consumers should be able to understand from the packaging that Target brand graham crackers are made of several different types of flour.

“It is reasonable for consumers [to] expect a product labeled ‘graham crackers’ to contain more graham (whole grain) flour than non-whole wheat flour, because ‘graham’ precedes and modifies ‘crackers,’ telling the shopper what they are getting,” states the Target graham crackers class action lawsuit.

Jamison is not the first consumer to lodge a class action lawsuit over misrepresented graham crackers. His attorneys have also launched actions against Honey Maid and Walmart’s Great Value brand graham crackers.

The class action lawsuits’ primary contention is that the products are mainly made with refined white flour, rather than graham flour, but are still advertised as “graham” crackers.

“The [Target] Products’ name, ‘graham crackers,’ is also misleading because the [sic] name is not uniform among all identical or similar products which are designated as ‘graham crackers,’ where graham flour is the predominant flour,” points out the Target class action lawsuit.

The Target class action lawsuit seeks to represent a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased the store’s brand of either graham or honey graham crackers.

The plaintiff accuses Target of fraud and unjust enrichment from its allegedly false advertising of the product. The plaintiff is seeking damages as well as a court order requiring Target to properly label its graham cracker products.

Jamison is represented by Spencer Sheehan of Sheehan & Associates PC and Joshua Levin-Epstein of Levin-Epstein & Associates PC.

The Target Market Pantry Graham Crackers Class Action Lawsuit is Jamison v. Target Corporation, Case No. 1:19-cv-00650-NGG-PK, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

193 thoughts onTarget Class Action Says Graham Crackers Need More Graham Flour

  1. Randall calano says:

    Add me also

  2. Irene nuzzi says:

    Add me too please

  3. Salima Valani says:

    Target not only sells products in a misleading and deceptive manner, their hiring process is discrimination too. I had applied at Target for a Guest Checkout position on their career website.
    I had an interview on 07/31/2019. I had thought the interview went great since I have several years of retail experience and being a cashier at Target store was most suitable for me. HR person had told me that I’ll receive an email with further instructions.

    On 08/01/2019, I received an email response that the hiring team had has not selected you for further consideration for this role.

    I am a middle aged minority woman and I exactly know that Target hiring team has discriminated against me in spite of my work experience. I would appreciate any legal advice in this manner.

  4. Wendy Levin says:

    Add Me!!

  5. Yvette Muse says:

    Please Add Me

  6. Diana Stfort says:

    Please add me

  7. Lynne T. Edwards says:

    Please add me.

  8. Theresa Patton says:

    Please add me

  9. DAVID NIELSEN says:

    Please add

1 17 18 19

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.