Sarah Mirando  |  December 7, 2011

Category: Legal News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Settlement News!

Sony Hit with Class Action Over “No Class Action” Clause

By Sarah Pierce

 

Sony PlayStation 3We saw this one coming. Back in September, TopClassActions.com reported that Sony changed its terms of service through a mandatory PlayStation Network update that removed PSN members’ right to file or be part of a class action lawsuit against Sony and its partners. That didn’t sit too well with gamers, who have fired back with a federal class action lawsuit claiming Sony unfairly changed the terms of use for its PlayStation 3 games, forcing them to waive their rights to sue in order to keep playing.

According to the Sony PlayStation class action lawsuit, Sony forced even longtime owners of the game system to agree to the new terms – including mandatory arbitration – if they wanted to keep using Sony’s online gaming and entertainment network. The mandatory arbitration clause was purposefully hidden in a 21-page-long new terms of service contract in order to discourage members from actually reading the entire contract and discovering they were giving up their rights to sue, the lawsuit says.

“To further discourage users from carefully reviewing the September 2011 PSN terms of use, including the arbitration clause and class action waiver, defendants prevented users from easily accessing the terms on the Internet,” which had previously been made available online to allow consumers to review and print the terms of use. “The September 2011 terms of use could only be located if a user expended significant time navigating through multiple Sony websites,” the lawsuit says.

 
The Sony PlayStation class action lawsuit points out numerous other hurdles Sony erected, including a difficult “opt out” process that forced customers to first agree to the terms of use, and then send a written notice to Sony’s legal department within 30 days that included a “clear statement that you do not wish to resolve disputes with any Sony entity through arbitration.”

Sony further discouraged uses from invoking the arbitration clause by including language that makes it difficult for users to recover their attorneys’ fees.

“Even if a user prevails in arbitration against any defendant or other Sony entity, if the claim is less than $75,000, a user can only recover his or her attorney’s fees if he or she has first provided notice to, and negotiated in good faith with, the defendant before pursuing arbitration,” the class action lawsuit points out.

The Sony PlayStation terms of service class action lawsuit is seeking restitution, declaratory judgment, an injunction, costs and damages for breach of faith and fair dealing, and unfair competition.

A copy of the Sony PlayStation Terms of Service Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.

The case is Stephen Fineman v. Sony Network Entertainment International LLC, et al., Case No. 11-cv-05680, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

 

Updated December 7th, 2011

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.

One thought on Sony Hit with Class Action Over “No Class Action” Clause

  1. Anonymous says:

    what bugs me most about this case is that if you purchased downloadable content prior to the arbitration clause change and you refuse to sign new agreement like i did., You can no longer get access to the content you paid for. And sony refuses to offer the same download content on dvd or blueray for a fee so those of us who refused to sign the new user agreement can still have the content we paid for available to us.

    I have a lot of download content i own I can not get access to to use in conjunction to offline gaming

    at this point I have boycotted all purchases where sony or its affiliates would gain any profits. example if I fet a sony game i buy used so sony sees no profits. Wish I could join this class action. doubt I could to to extreme poverty. and location of residence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.