Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
A class action lawsuit alleges that the publisher of magazines like Vogue, Vanity Fair, GQ, and Glamour, unlawfully auto-renews magazine subscriptions without consumer knowledge or consent.
Plaintiffs Saul Granillo and Jennifer Fite say they responded to advertisements offering a one-year magazine subscription at a discounted rate.
They allege that they were not notified that the subscriptions would auto-renew at a higher rate.
The customers claim that Conde Nast makes a practice of automatically renewing subscriptions without adequately notifying consumers.
Granillo says that in July 2017, he responded to an online offer to receive six issues of Vogue for $6. He claims that he provided his debit card details and was charged $6. However, the plaintiff states that in November 2017 Conde Nast charged him $21.99 to the same card without his authorization.
The Conde Nast class action lawsuit claims that the company enrolled him into an auto-renewal program when he submitted his initial order for six issues of Vogue. Granillo says that had he known that Conde Nast would enroll him in an automatic renewal or continuous service program, he would not have responded to the Vogue offer and would not have paid the company any money.
Fite says she had a similar experience. Allegedly, she gave Conde Nast her credit card information in August 2017 to purchase a one-year subscription to Vanity Fair for $5. However, in September 2018 Conde Nast reportedly posted a charge to her account for the amount of $12. Allegedly, this charge was posted without her authorization.
The magazine subscription class action lawsuit claims that like Granillo, she was enrolled into an auto-renewal program when she made her initial purchase of Vanity Fair. Allegedly, she was unaware at the time of her purchase that she was enrolled in the program, and did not consent to being enrolled in it. She says that had she known that she would be enrolled in the program, she would not have placed her order for Vanity Fair and would not have paid money to the company.
Allegedly, many other customers had similar experiences, and complained about the experience to the Better Business Bureau.
The Conde Nast class action lawsuit says this practice violates California law. Allegedly, California law requires companies to disclose auto-renewal programs conspicuously to customers before they make their purchases.
According to the Vogue, Vanity Fair auto-renewal class action lawsuit, Conde Nast failed to disclose their auto renewal policy intentionally in an effort to maximize its profits.
Granillo and Fite say that they and many other customers were financially injured by Conde Nast’s practice. They seek damages on behalf of themselves and all other similarly affected consumers, in addition to an injunction barring the company from continuing to auto-renew subscriptions without consent.
Have you ever been enrolled in an auto-renewal program without your consent? Share with us your experienced in the comment section.
The customers are represented by James Hannink and Zach P. Dostart of Dostart Hannink & Coveney LLP.
The Conde Nast Auto-Renewal Class Action Lawsuit is Saul Granillo, et al. v. Conde Nast Entertainment LLC, Case No. 37-2019-00051411-CU-BT-CTL, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego.
Read More Lawsuit & Settlement News:
Smithsonian Class Action Says Magazine Subscribers’ Info Sold
After New York Legal Reform, More Lawsuits Over Sexual Abuse in Catholic Church Expected
Condé Nast Magazine Class Action Settlement Checks Mailed
Roundup Cancer Lawsuit Venue Debated by Monsanto, Plaintiffs
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
92 thoughts onVogue, Vanity Fair Class Action Says Subscriptions Auto Renew
Same here! One auto renewed for $29.99 and another for $119.99! Even worse, is that they renewed through PayPal without even telling me which magazines I was supposedly paying for! PayPal interceded for me and so far I was refunded the $29.99. I am hoping obviously to get the $119.99 back as well (for what, I have no idea!)
Condé Nast is still at it. I sent away for the one-year subscription two years ago, then I learned through a debit charge via PayPal that the auto-charge was increased to $50 (without my known consent). I cancelled future payments and thought it was done but realized tonight that the publication company has been charging me $24.97 each month! For what?! One magazine? This is completely fraudulent behavior. If a consumer cuts off payment, that should be it.
I learned that the best way to settle any bill is with personal check. Smithsonian has just added its company to the list of devious users of the “automatic” renewal by claiming … in very small print … that it’s offering an “advantage” to its customers to ensure continuous delivery of its magazine.
But the most egregious method Smithsonian uses is to lure new customers with an extremely good yearly rate of $12. Then in small print they inform the consumer that their subscription will be renewed automatically. At “the renewal rate then in effect”. There’s the hitch. The renewal rate … a “special” rate quoted is $39. That’s more than three times my original rate.
Smithsonian is at the top of the list of devious scammers. Disgraceful
Paid $35,00 Canadian for a one year Vanity Fair Subscrtiption in August 2022. Have not received a single issue in the mail but just received (mid October) a request for a subscription renewal saying I must respond within 10 days. I think I did see that the subscription would be “auto renewed” but I assumed that this would occur at end of 12 months. Asking for a renewal, and presumably charging for the renewal before the first issue is received is rediculous and a scam if ever I have seen one. Please include me in the class action.
I accepted a subscription last year with required autorenewal for Vanity Fair. I had full intent to cancel and set an alarm. I log in to VF and go to manage subscription and it requires more information. Then it “can’t find my subscription”, yet will tell me that I have one. It asks for a number off of the mailing label ( I have digital sub) to confirm.
Obviously this is a dark pattern, trying to obstruct cancellation. Just for fun, I went the other way, started to effect a renewal. SURPRISE! It’s very easy to renew and no, you don’t need that impossible account number to renew, just to manage, ie cancel.
This is the worst I’ve seen and while Wired has been much more normal about managing my subscriptions, I’m just going to avoid Conde Nast overall if they permit this kind of subscriber abuse.
By the way, I went into paypal, which was my payment source and just took conde nast off of approved recurring payments. This way, they will NOT get my money no matter how hard they make it to cancel recurring.
Same! Tried to cancel after they renewed me at $54.99! They pretended they didn’t have my information. But I have a print subscription and they send me emails. So it’s been weeks of sending them info they already had and they still haven’t refunded me.
add me please