Steven Cohen  |  February 3, 2020

Category: Food

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Burger KingBurger King has filed a motion to dismiss a class action alleging that the fast food chain tricks customers into thinking that their Impossible Whopper is vegan, when it is cooked on the same grill as other meat products.

Phillip Williams filed the lawsuit in November 2019 claiming that he is a strict vegan and does not eat or drink anything with animal by-products.

He states that he ordered an Impossible Whopper at a Burger King in Georgia, and requested that the restaurant put no mayonnaise on it.

Williams says he believed that he would be getting a “vegan” sandwich and that it would be cooked on a different surface than what is used for beef and chicken.

The motion to dismiss from the company argues that Burger King never stated that their Impossible Whopper was “vegan” and did not assure customers that it would be cooked on a separate flame broiler than the one used to cook beef patties.

In addition, Burger King claims that it could not have marketed the plant-based Whopper as “vegan” because the product has mayonnaise on it.

The defendant alleges that Williams “assumed that an Impossible Whopper would satisfy his own particularly strict form of veganism—which, to him, required a separate cooking method—solely because he asked a Burger King restaurant employee to ‘hold the mayo.’” 

The motion to dismiss states that Williams does not have a claim for breach of contract, breach of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), nor for unjust enrichment.

In addition, Burger King claims that the plaintiff did not meet the “reasonableness” requirement for his claims because he must show that the advertisement of the Impossible Whopper contained a definite promise. 

Burger King argues that they never promised the plaintiff a “vegan” sandwich or that they would be cooking the Impossible Whopper in any particular way.

The defendant claims that Williams should have asked about the cooking method of the Impossible Whopper, but the plaintiff admits that he did not do this.

“Moreover, [Burger King Corporation] stated on its website and elsewhere, and major media outlets widely reported, that Burger King guests may request an alternative cooking method if they do not want the Impossible Whopper cooked on the same flame broiler used for beef and chicken,” the motion to dismiss claims.

In addition, Burger King states that even if the plaintiff had a valid personal claim, he cannot represent a Class consisting of “all” Impossible Whopper purchasers.

“Remove any of the unique facts Mr. Williams claims about himself—each of which will require individualized discovery and be subject to challenge by BKC—and he no longer would have even a personal claim,” the motion to dismiss argues.

The defendant states that Williams cannot put forward any argument that every Impossible Whopper purchaser shares his strict beliefs or that that every customer was unaware of the cooking method.

“Missing from the Complaint, however, is any allegation that BKC ever described the Impossible Whopper as ‘vegan’ or promised a cooking method that would avoid all contact with the restaurants’ meat offerings,” the motion to dismiss states.

Have you tried the Impossible Whopper? If so, leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiff is represented by Eugene Y. Turin of McGuire Law PC and David P. Healy.

The Burger King Impossible Whopper Class Action Lawsuit is Phillip Williams v. Burger King Corporation, Case No. 1:19-cv-24755, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

UPDATE: On March 9, 2020, Burger King asked a judge to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging the plant-based Impossible Whopper was misrepresented.

UPDATE 2: On July 20, 2020, a federal judge has thrown out a class action lawsuit that alleged Burger King deceived its customers about how its Impossible Whoppers are cooked.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


68 thoughts onBurger King Wants Impossible Whopper Class Action Tossed

  1. Michael Pointer says:

    Please add me too.

  2. Raul Fierro says:

    Add me.

  3. Victoria Pointer says:

    Add me please.

  4. Sharon Lavine says:

    Add me please

  5. Marty Hubbard says:

    Add me

  6. Connie coulter says:

    Please add me I tried the impossible burger

  7. Debby Tarafa says:

    add me

  8. Jean M Hart says:

    I don’t like that burger I thought it was going to be good no beef not very good the only thing Impossible about the impossible Whopper is it’s impossible to swallow

  9. Cara Cotton says:

    Add me please

  10. Anna jennett says:

    Please add me ..I got very sick from eating it

    1. a levy says:

      No kidding. It has a ton of GMO garbag in it. The lawsuit is not against the burger.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.