Emily Sortor  |  March 28, 2019

Category: Food

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Mike & Ike candiesOn Monday, a California federal judge gave Class certification to consumers who claim that Just Born Inc. candy makers under fill boxes of their famous Hot Tamales and Mike and Ike candies.

U.S. District Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr. certified the Class of individuals who purchased 5-ounce boxes of Mike and Ikes and Hot Tamales after Feb. 3, 2013.

According to Judge Hatter, the consumers had effectively demonstrated that they could make a common claim about the alleged nonfunctional space in the candy boxes, and had shown that there were enough affected consumers to form a Class.

Plaintiff Stephanie Escobar filed the Mike and Ike class action lawsuit in February 2017. She says she purchased a box of Mike and Ikes from a movie theatre in Los Angeles.

The Mike and Ike class action claims that Escobar paid $4 for the box, and only after she purchased it did she discover that the box was half full of candy.

Escobar says she could not check how full the box was before purchasing it because it was behind a glass case. She argues that because of this, she had to rely on the size of the candy box to interpret how much candy was in there.

According to the Hot Tamales class action, the box was 46 percent empty, and the empty space serves no functional purpose, so Just Born’s inclusion of that space violates California law.

She is seeking compensation on behalf of herself and all similarly affected consumers.

The Mike and Ike class action also requests that the candy company be required to stop deceiving customers about how much candy they are receiving in a box.

Asserting that her experience is representative of many consumers’ experience purchasing Mike and Ikes and Hot Tamales, the motion states that “if [Escobar] proves that one unit of a 5-oz. box of Mike and Ikes contains nonfunctional slack-fill, then that will be true of every 5-oz. box of Mike and Ike.”

“If plaintiff proves that the empty space in the products is nonfunctional, then the packaging is misleading as a matter of law,” the motion continued.

Escobar argues that to be in accordance with California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, False Adverting Law, and Unfair Competition Law, Just Born should package their candies in boxes that reflect the amount of candy in the box — either by making the boxes smaller, putting more candy in the larger boxes, or somehow alerting consumers to the fact that the box is only half full.

Just Born attempted to oppose Class certification, saying that Escobar’s experience could not be taken as representative for many consumers’ experience.

To support this argument, the company cited a survey of people who purchased Mike and Ikes and Hot Tamales. Allegedly, 80 percent of the people surveyed said that they received exactly the amount of candy that they expected to receive in a box of movie theatre candy.

Escobar is represented by Ryan J. Clarkson, Shireen M. Clarkson and Bahar Sodaify of Clarkson Law Firm PC.

The Mike and Ike, Hot Tamales Packaging Class Action Lawsuit is Stephanie Escobar v. Just Born Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-01826, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

UPDATE: On July 19, 2019, a federal court judge reconsidered a March 2019 ruling, stating that he ruled in error when he granted Class certification to consumers who sued Just Born Inc. for underfilling boxes of their Hot Tamales and Mike and Ike candies.

UPDATE 2: August 2020, the Mike and Ike, Hot Tamales class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.  

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


1,028 thoughts onMike And Ike, Hot Tamales Class Action Lawsuit Gets Certified

  1. Yvette Dhuperoyrs says:

    Add me pls

  2. Saribeth says:

    This has to be one of the most frivolous lawsuits I have ever heard of! Do we accept no responsibility for our own negligence at all any more? This case never should have been permitted to go forward.

  3. Gail Amado says:

    Add me. I purchase several boxes of Hot Tamales at least twice the month.

1 101 102 103

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.