Emily Sortor  |  February 4, 2019

Category: Electronics

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

best buy retail location parking lot with a geek squad branded vehicle parked outsideBest Buy’s Geek Squad and Samsung have dodged a class action lawsuit claiming that the companies provide customers with fraudulent warranties.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman dismissed class action claims that Best Buy’s “Geek Squad Protection Plan” is a warranty that doesn’t live up to its promises.

According to Judge Coleman, the protection plan doesn’t qualify as a warranty at all, and instead qualifies as a service contract. Based on this distinction, the Illinois federal judge determined that the class action allegations weren’t valid.

The Geek Squad class action lawsuit was filed by Tawanna and Anthony Ware who claimed that they purchased a Samsung plasma TV from Best Buy in 2013. They say that at the same time, they purchased a five-year Geek Squad Protection Plan, claiming that the plan promised to pay for service, repairs, and a replacement TV if necessary.

The Wares argued that the Geek Squad Protection Plan qualifies as a warranty, which is subject to certain standards under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

However, they claimed that Best Buy failed to live up to the protection plan’s promises because they chose how they would compensate customers for issues with their TV, which included giving customers a voucher for a new TV.

Samsung and Best Buy first attempted to have the Geek Squad Protection Plan class action lawsuit dismissed in October, claiming that the customers’ allegations were time-barred. They withdrew this dismissal motion in November.

The Wares then amended their claims, and the companies and made a new move to dismiss in December. It was this move that was approved by Judge Coleman.

The federal judge determined that the Geek Squad Protection Plan failed to satisfy the “express statutory definition of the term ‘warranty’ for the purpose of the Magnuson-Moss Act,” so the claims brought forward by the Wares under the act were not valid.

According to Judge Coleman, the definition of what qualifies under the Magnuson-Moss Act is determined by how the warranty or protection plan is priced.

She stated that the protection plan is listed separately on the Wares’ receipt, meaning it was a separately purchased item, it was not a warranty for the item. However, if the Geek Squad Protection Plan came included in the price of the item itself, it would be legally considered a warranty, according to Judge Coleman.

The Wares tried to combat this distinction by claiming that the Geek Squad Protection Plan counted as a warranty and was part of the same purchase because they received a discount for “bundling” their purchase of the TV and the protection plan.

Judge Coleman rejected this argument, saying that “the fact that the Wares were offered a discounted price for a consolidated purchase, however, is not indicative of whether their television purchase and their purchase of the Geek Squad Protection Plan were part of het same bargain.”

She goes on to say that “to the contrary, the Wares’ repeated allegations that they paid separate amounts for the ‘bundled’ television and Geek Squad Protection Plan purchases clearly indicate that the Geek Squad Protection Plan was not part of the ‘bargain’ for the television’s purchase.”

Judge Coleman also stressed that the Magnuson-Moss Act refers to warranties that cover the materials and workmanship of a product, and does not refer to service plans that cover wear and tear on products, as well as preventative maintenance.

The Wares are represented by Thomas Cronin of Cronin & Co. Ltd. and Paul Rothstein of the Law Offices of Attorney Paul S. Rothstein.

The Best Buy Geek Squad Protection Plan Class Action Lawsuit is Ware, et al. v. Best Buy Stores LP, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00886, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


55 thoughts onBest Buy Dodges ‘Geek Squad’ Warranty Class Action Lawsuit

  1. Angela Jackson says:

    Please add me

  2. Michelle Kitts says:

    Please add me

  3. Yen says:

    I bought a Sony Bravia , expensive TV. When instalation arrived we barely notice a dot on the screen, two months pass and the dots on the screen became larger. It looks like an inside crack. Best buy does not want to cover, by alledging the product was accidentally damage, and prote tion plan does not cover accidental damage. It was them who install the TV, the TV came like that from the store. I paid instalation, I bet it could have had that accident during delivery, or who knows. End of story they brought it to me like that, and they still say they are not responsible.

  4. Ellena chronister says:

    internal crack

  5. Laps says:

    We just purchased a Samsung Tv only for it to have a cracked screen upon opening. They will not refund us. Pursuing class action. Manager said they see 10 cracked tv screens come in a day. Something is wrong w this. Consumers need to be protected. Nov 13,2019. Ppplleeaassee respond if you have tried to return a cracked screen tv just purchased w no help from Best Buy.

    1. Jeff Owings says:

      You can add me to that list. The screen was cracked right out of the box and they are refusing to exchange it. I purchased the tv in Tulsa, Oklahoma and moved to Chicago. The store in Chicago will not accept it without authorization from Tulsa. Tulsa says they cannot do anything and their corporate office says it is past the timeframe to return a tv for a cracked screen.

    2. Sis Fair says:

      Cracked screen. Have been trying to get it repaired since beginning of March. . Paid $700 cost + $200 warranty. The warranty ends in 2 weeks. Have been unable to get Best Buy Geek Squad to help, says I must have an appt but none available. Been on the phone 3 hours & still waiting for a person today 6/27/20. What pisses me off is I order & paid for ($60) a screen replacement in March before Covid closing, but they sent the screen back.

  6. Rhonda says:

    Add me

  7. Ivy Byfield says:

    I am going the same games from BeSt Buy right now for an refurbished air conditioner and I am going take litigating action now.

  8. Jen H says:

    Best Buy and its subsidiary company Great Call Lively Medical Alert Devices are now facing a major Class Action Lawsuit as well the devices have been secretly being recalled. The problem is that Great Call and Best Buy tried to cover the entire problem up.

    If you have any Great Call devices return them or file a law suit as the cover up is getting bigger as the company has now lied and misled all of us who use this fake device for help.

    GPS does not work, 911 help does not work, It is NOT water Proof, the Fall detection is a failure and the entire device is a fraud.

  9. Michelle L Dewar-Boldt says:

    Add me Michelle dewar-boldt

  10. Tonique Gilmore says:

    add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.