Lauren Silva , Jessy Edwards  |  September 6, 2022

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

GM engine GMC Sierra
(Photo Credit:Denise Kappa/Shutterstock)

Update:

  • General Motors can’t escape most of the class action claims lodged by a Georgia resident who alleges the automaker made defective engines that put occupants at risk, a Georgia federal judge has ruled.
  • In an order issued Aug. 30, U.S. District Court Judge William M. Ray II mostly denied a motion to dismiss lodged by General Motors LLC.
  • GM argued that all claims brought by plaintiff Anthony Nalley should be thrown out because they are time-barred and insufficiently pleaded. 
  • However Judge Ray said the issue of when the limitations periods began to toll is best settled by a jury, and struck only a claim for breach of express warranty.

GM engine oil consumption class action lawsuit overview:

  • Why: The plaintiff claims GM knew about the oil issues in its Vortec 5300 Engines but failed to disclose the defect to customers.
  • Who: A GMC Sierra owner sued General Motors.
  • Where: The class action lawsuit is pending in Georgia federal court.

(10/12/2021)

A Georgia resident is suing General Motors (GM) over allegedly defective engines and deceptive trade practices that put occupants at risk. 

Anthony Nalley says he bought a new 2011 GMC Sierra equipped with a Generation IV Vortec 5300 Engine in March 2011. In 2015, after Nalley experienced an engine misfire in one of the cylinders and the check engine light, he was informed by a GM dealer that his GMC Sierra also had a fouled spark plug and an oil consumption problem. 

GM, however, denied the oil consumption repairs that Nalley requested. Nalley maintains that GM never notified him about an oil consumption issue with the engine in his car.

The defective Generation IV 5.3 Liter V8 Vortec 5300 LC9 engines affect select model year 2011-2014 Chevrolet and GMC Sierra, and other vehicles. Nalley represents himself and a state Class of people who bought or leased one or more of these Class Vehicles in the State of Georgia. 

The class action lawsuit accuses GM of deceptive trade practices, unfair business practices, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and unjust enrichment. 

GM engines ‘engineered to fail’

The Generation IV Vortec 5300 Engine consumes an “abnormally and improperly high” quantity of oil that allegedly exceeds industry standards, according to court documents. This excessive oil consumption results in low oil levels, insufficient lubricity levels, and corresponding engine component damage.

The class action lawsuit points to several causes of the oil consumption defect. One, the GM engine’s piston rings fail to keep oil in the crankcase. Two, the active fuel management system overloads the oil sprayed onto the defective piston rings, which leads to excessive oil migration into combustion chambers where it is then burned. 

The oil migration fouls spark plugs no matter how often drivers top off their oil levels. Fouled spark plugs then lead to weakened or intermittent sparks or no spark at all, which triggers engine misfires and shutdowns. 

Further, GM’s Oil Life Monitoring System monitors engine conditions to calculate the recommended time for an oil change and does not advise drivers until oil levels are critically low, according to the complaint. This results in drivers traveling “thousands of miles with inadequate engine lubricity levels, wearing out and damaging moving internal engine components.”

GM knew about oil consumption engine issue

GM has known about the oil consumption defect and resulting damage as early as 2007, according to the complaint. A 2008 GM investigation supposedly concluded the piston rings were prematurely failing and causing excessive oil consumption and internal engine wear. However, GM did not disclose the defect to potential customers of the affected vehicles. 

Starting with some 2014 model vehicles, GM began implementing a Generation V Vortec 5300 engine which was redesigned to fix the excessive oil consumption of the Generation IV. GM has not offered relief to customers who own the defective Class Vehicles, according to the class action lawsuit. 

The class action lawsuit seeks actual and statutory damages, punitive damages, restitution, pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ costs. 

Do you own a Chevrolet, GMC Sierra, or other vehicle with a Generation IV engine? How has it worked for you? Tell us in the comments below!

The plaintiff is represented by Benjamin R. Keen and H. Clay Barnett III of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles P.C.

The GM Engines Oil Consumption Class Action Lawsuit is Nalley v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-04174-WMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division. 


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

130 thoughts onGM engine defect class action escapes dismissal

  1. Eric Hannah says:

    Add me to the list. I’m burning too much oil in my 2011 Chevy equinox AND, service light is on an come to find out, the Cadillac converter is also bad, O.. an the thermostat is bad also. Just all bad. I definitely want in in this class action suit!!

  2. Dan Cook says:

    Same problem here. 2010 Suburban—at around 150K miles spent $4K to fix damage from cylinder deactivation—still drank oil—only to pay $10K 2 yrs later on new engine. Same with my wife’s 2009 suburban at around 150K miles same issue with cylinder deactivation—same path—spent $4K to fix but still drinks oil

  3. Kristy Evans-Beulah says:

    Please add me to the list. I own 2011 Suburban, it was burning up oil so bad we had to add oil every week. Plus it was smoking. We had to replace the engine in October.

  4. Dillon Hain says:

    Add me to the list. Bought a 2013 Chevy Equinox in 2019. Timing and actuation went out. Also a plugged catylitic converter. All stems from the high consumption of oil.

  5. Rich Goularte says:

    I have an 07 that’s been in the shop for 9 weeks now. I was using a quart of oil every 900 miles. Took it to shop and using a boroscope it was discovered cylinder 7 had a busted ring sitting on top of piston and the cylinder was scored. The oil was drained to find pieces of metal just under the size of a dime. There was also fuel in the oil. The warranty company, GWC refuses to pay for It. They want the motor pulled and torn down to find failed part. I will be responsible for that bill if GWC doesn’t find a failed part. If they do find a failed part, it will be their decision to replace or rebuild the motor.

  6. Chasity says:

    Add me. Our 2012 GMV Sierra started having issues with this around 140,000 miles. We spent 1400 to have the oil problem fixed only to find out they want 8500 to truly fix it. Oil pressure drops and stays down.

  7. Chad says:

    i am currently repairing a 5.3L vortec in my 2012 sierra due to this issue, lifter on cylinder 6 was starved for oil and spun in its seat, now i have to replace lifters and cam shaft because the lifter ground out the cam lobe in a matter of seconds, i was unaware of these issues when i bought the truck late last year, so now i am having to put almost $1000 dollars into and vehicle i still owe 12k on, not to mention the time put into tearing the engine down to do all these repairs,

  8. Ben says:

    I have a 2008 Tahoe LTZ with same problem. I bought it used in 2016, from the local Chevrolet dealership, because it had low mileage. And now I suspect that it has always had engine issues since it was new

  9. David Weaver says:

    I have a 2011 GMC Terrain that is the 2.4L with the same issues:

  10. James J Scott says:

    Same here with my 2007 tahoe 5.3. Add me

1 4 5 6 7 8 12

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.