Lauren Silva , Jessy Edwards  |  September 6, 2022

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

GM engine GMC Sierra
(Photo Credit:Denise Kappa/Shutterstock)

Update:

  • General Motors can’t escape most of the class action claims lodged by a Georgia resident who alleges the automaker made defective engines that put occupants at risk, a Georgia federal judge has ruled.
  • In an order issued Aug. 30, U.S. District Court Judge William M. Ray II mostly denied a motion to dismiss lodged by General Motors LLC.
  • GM argued that all claims brought by plaintiff Anthony Nalley should be thrown out because they are time-barred and insufficiently pleaded. 
  • However Judge Ray said the issue of when the limitations periods began to toll is best settled by a jury, and struck only a claim for breach of express warranty.

GM engine oil consumption class action lawsuit overview:

  • Why: The plaintiff claims GM knew about the oil issues in its Vortec 5300 Engines but failed to disclose the defect to customers.
  • Who: A GMC Sierra owner sued General Motors.
  • Where: The class action lawsuit is pending in Georgia federal court.

(10/12/2021)

A Georgia resident is suing General Motors (GM) over allegedly defective engines and deceptive trade practices that put occupants at risk. 

Anthony Nalley says he bought a new 2011 GMC Sierra equipped with a Generation IV Vortec 5300 Engine in March 2011. In 2015, after Nalley experienced an engine misfire in one of the cylinders and the check engine light, he was informed by a GM dealer that his GMC Sierra also had a fouled spark plug and an oil consumption problem. 

GM, however, denied the oil consumption repairs that Nalley requested. Nalley maintains that GM never notified him about an oil consumption issue with the engine in his car.

The defective Generation IV 5.3 Liter V8 Vortec 5300 LC9 engines affect select model year 2011-2014 Chevrolet and GMC Sierra, and other vehicles. Nalley represents himself and a state Class of people who bought or leased one or more of these Class Vehicles in the State of Georgia. 

The class action lawsuit accuses GM of deceptive trade practices, unfair business practices, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and unjust enrichment. 

GM engines ‘engineered to fail’

The Generation IV Vortec 5300 Engine consumes an “abnormally and improperly high” quantity of oil that allegedly exceeds industry standards, according to court documents. This excessive oil consumption results in low oil levels, insufficient lubricity levels, and corresponding engine component damage.

The class action lawsuit points to several causes of the oil consumption defect. One, the GM engine’s piston rings fail to keep oil in the crankcase. Two, the active fuel management system overloads the oil sprayed onto the defective piston rings, which leads to excessive oil migration into combustion chambers where it is then burned. 

The oil migration fouls spark plugs no matter how often drivers top off their oil levels. Fouled spark plugs then lead to weakened or intermittent sparks or no spark at all, which triggers engine misfires and shutdowns. 

Further, GM’s Oil Life Monitoring System monitors engine conditions to calculate the recommended time for an oil change and does not advise drivers until oil levels are critically low, according to the complaint. This results in drivers traveling “thousands of miles with inadequate engine lubricity levels, wearing out and damaging moving internal engine components.”

GM knew about oil consumption engine issue

GM has known about the oil consumption defect and resulting damage as early as 2007, according to the complaint. A 2008 GM investigation supposedly concluded the piston rings were prematurely failing and causing excessive oil consumption and internal engine wear. However, GM did not disclose the defect to potential customers of the affected vehicles. 

Starting with some 2014 model vehicles, GM began implementing a Generation V Vortec 5300 engine which was redesigned to fix the excessive oil consumption of the Generation IV. GM has not offered relief to customers who own the defective Class Vehicles, according to the class action lawsuit. 

The class action lawsuit seeks actual and statutory damages, punitive damages, restitution, pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ costs. 

Do you own a Chevrolet, GMC Sierra, or other vehicle with a Generation IV engine? How has it worked for you? Tell us in the comments below!

The plaintiff is represented by Benjamin R. Keen and H. Clay Barnett III of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles P.C.

The GM Engines Oil Consumption Class Action Lawsuit is Nalley v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 1:21-cv-04174-WMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division. 


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

130 thoughts onGM engine defect class action escapes dismissal

  1. Angel Ramirez says:

    2017 Terrain uses a quart of oil every 2500 miles system shows oil life at 62% add me to suit

  2. Craig Kehrer says:

    2013 Chevy Avalanche which uses oil and the check engine light is on more than not!

  3. Dan says:

    I own a 2013 gmc Yukon xl and this engine has some serious issues. I have replaced my plugs and wires 3 times and in each time the plugs in 1,3, and 7 have been burned out. A local shop opened up my air intake and found a puddle of oil in there also. Something needs to be done. A new engine will cost $11k and a rebuilt $5600

    1. Doug says:

      Who receives this money? And how do you apply? Oil issues I have a 2013 Chevy Silverado takes at least a quart oil every 3,000 miles where’s the money go?

  4. Billie Engel says:

    2015 Cadillac SRX ECM failure relay problem parts continue to fail, wiring, lights, crash alert , backup camera failure. Thousands in debt, and car impounded, starter failure. Help . Why are there no safety claims yet. Maybe due to price making, dealership rich. Y do gm dealership nolonger have Cadillac in the name randomly, dealership, names change so quickly. .. money . Y is it I paid 17,900 3 yrs ago n I’m offered 12,000 by car dealership,insurance claims proposals….. More money Cadillac gets off free while others suffer. Oh and Cadillac SRX now xt5 same issues follow diff model. Sales go unforseen . They win again. Unhappy no driver of an impound lot ordament . Ps the radio is the bomb . But will I get u to work. Cadillac potential future slogan…….

  5. Jeri Denise Sells says:

    I have a 2011 Buick Lacrosse. The 2.4ltr ECTO engine began burning oil shortly after I purchased the car. Have had to replace timing belt water pump spark plugs all sensors. The rear upstream sensor burns out after 2 weeks. Constant topping off of oil. All of this started at 50 000 miles. Add me to the classaction list.

  6. Linda Brown says:

    I have a 2012 chevy equinox that has had consistent oil changes and driven under 75,000 miles. Engine started making a knocking noise, discovered oil had burnt up, and engine is irreparable. Please add me to class action lawsuit.

  7. Casey says:

    Please add me

  8. Steven Smith says:

    I have a 2021 GMC Canyon I bought new. Went thru 5 quarts of oil in around 3000 miles. It is a V6. Finally GM let the GMC dealer I bought it from tear the motor down. It also had an engine knock. 3 of the 6 cylinders had oil leaking into them from spark plug gaskets not sealing cylinders. Oil was even in one of the coils on top of plug. New seals were put in to stop the leaking from going thru the cylinders. GM would not let them look for the spark knock problem. Driving on repaired motor knock got worse. 500 miles I took back to dealer. Dealer could not find any reason. GM then told them to change oil & lots of metal was found in oil. GM sent a rebuilt motor to replace mine new with a 5 year 50,000 mile engine warranty. Rebuilt motor has less warranty than my original new one. I complained to dealer I should have the same engine warranty. Their answer is that is GM rules. I feel screwed since I asked for a NEW V6 motor to the dealer. I got another sick engine that was redone without any choice due to GM warranty rules. Rebuilt V6 seems ok so far, but the original NEW factory one was good for a while too.

  9. Roger L Lott says:

    Add me.

  10. Connie matthews says:

    My 2011 chevy serra is burning oil and misfiring. Change the plugs and wires and it’s getting worse. Add me to the law suit please

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.