Abraham Jewett  |  October 13, 2022

Category: Privacy

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Close up of Samsung signage one exterior of building.
(Photo Credit: JPstock/Shutterstock)

Samsung Galaxy biometric data arbitration overview: 

  • Who: A group of nearly 50,000 Samsung Galaxy mobile device users claims Samsung is refusing to fulfill its obligation to pay for arbitration proceedings. 
  • Why: Galaxy users claim Samsung is unlawfully collecting their biometric data through the use of its facial recognition technology. 
  • Where: The case is in Illinois federal court. 

A group of nearly 50,000 Samsung Galaxy mobile device users is accusing the company of refusing to pay its share for arbitration proceedings the company has mandated over claims it unlawfully collected their biometric data

The group filed a petition and a motion to compel arbitration last week, with the device users arguing Samsung is acting in a “blatant display of hubris and hypocrisy” by declining to pay their portion of the costs to have the arbitration proceedings. 

Samsung is accused of breaching its own commitment to pay for its portion of any individual arbitration proceedings the company itself requires in order to resolve disputes with it. 

“For nearly a decade, Samsung has included a forced mandatory arbitration provision and class action waiver in its terms and conditions wielding it as a shield to successfully evade class actions and, more importantly, liability,” the mobile device users’ motion to compel arbitration says. 

Samsung accused of reneging on obligation to help pay for arbitration proceedings 

Galaxy device users claim Samsung says it will only arbitrate their claims if each of the individual consumers — of which there are tens of thousands — pay the fees necessary for the proceedings to take place. 

Samsung is being accused of violating Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act by allegedly covertly collecting, generating and storing the biometric identifiers of consumers who use its Galaxy mobile devices. 

Galaxy device users claim Samsung uses its facial recognition technology to collect their biometric identifiers when they take selfies on their mobile devices. 

Last month, in a separate biometric privacy case, Kronos agreed to pay more than $15 million in order to resolve claims the company violated Illinois biometric privacy law with the fingerprint time clocks it manufactures.

Have you had your biometric data collected by a company without your consent? Let us know in the comments. 

The plaintiffs are represented by Jonathan Gardner, Melissa H. Nafash, Jonathan Waisnor and Shannon K. Tully of Labaton Sucharow LLP, and Mark R. Miller of Wallace Miller.

The Samsung Galaxy biometric data class action lawsuit is Wallrich, et al. v. Samsung Electronics America Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-05506, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. 


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

75 thoughts onSamsung pushes for arbitration over alleged unlawful collection of biometric data

  1. Cheryl Collins says:

    My information was breached more than once and currently is due thus this, my Samsung phone is currently hacked and Samsung has done nothing to help me

  2. Samsung user says:

    The cut off date was last year. y’all are a little late with your “add me’s”

  3. Crystal Stephens says:

    I have always had a Samsung. Please add me.

  4. Steven O'Donnell says:

    Can I join this class action suit?

  5. Stephanie Rowell says:

    I’ve been a user of Samsung for many years please add me

  6. Maryann Brown says:

    Please add me. I’ve had Samsung Galaxy phones for years.

  7. andy patton says:

    why isn’t there a lawsuit for galaxy 9’s negating all your file transfers, etc with their update that fraudulently states there’s crud in the charger port? its a software engineered scam so you buy another phone

  8. Francis Ricucci says:

    I’ve had samsung smart phone for years and live in Illinois. Add me.

  9. Jennifer Dorsett says:

    I’ve had Galaxy phones for the last 7 years in Illinois. Please add me.

1 4 5 6

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.