Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Retail giant Walmart faces a class action lawsuit alleging the company violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act by using unauthorized background checks.
Lead plaintiff Randy Pitre alleges in his class action lawsuit that Walmart obtained a background check on him without legal authorization under the FCRA and California state law while he was working for the company.
The plaintiff argues in the Walmart class action that the company failed to provide adequate notice of the consumer report as well as failed to secure legal authorization to obtain it.
According to the class action lawsuit, Walmart has “a policy and practice of procuring investigative consumer reports or causing investigative consumer reports to be procured for applicants and employees without properly and legally obtaining authorization as it included other extraneous information other than the disclosure; and without notifying such applicants of their right to request a summary of their rights under the FCRA at the same time as the disclosure explaining that an investigative consumer report may be made.”
Pitre alleges that Walmart violated the FCRA and various California state laws when it obtained background checks on him and others applying with or working at Walmart. The plaintiff says that Walmart did not provide a “clear and conspicuous” disclosure notifying job seekers that it would be obtaining a consumer report on them. The plaintiff further alleges that the disclosures were “embedded with extraneous information” and were “not clear and unambiguous disclosures in stand-alone documents.”
“Under the FCRA, it is unlawful to procure or caused to be procured, a consumer report or investigative consumer report for employment purposes unless the disclosure is made in a document that consists solely of the disclosure and the consumer has authorized, in writing, the procurement of the report,” alleges the Walmart class action complaint.
The plaintiff also points out that the Federal Trade Commission reiterated this policy in a July 2011 report.
“As a result of [Walmart’s] illegal procurement of credit and background reports by way of their inadequate disclosures, as set forth above, plaintiff and class members have been injured including, but not limited to, having their privacy and statutory rights invaded in violation of the FCRA,” alleges the Walmart lawsuit.
The plaintiff seeks to represent a nationwide Class of current, former and prospective job applicants with Walmart who were subject to an unauthorized background check within the past five years. Pitre also seeks to represent a California subclass for alleged violations of state law.
The plaintiff seeks monetary relief on behalf of himself and the Class, along with statutory damages and an injunction on Walmart’s policy of obtaining employee background reports without proper disclosure.
Pitre is represented by Shaun Setareh and Thomas Segal of the Setareh Law Group.
The Walmart Background Check Class Action Lawsuit is Randy Pitre v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Case No. 8:17-cv-01281-DOC-DFM, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
UPDATE: On Oct. 15, 2018, plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit alleging Walmart violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act during its employment process urged a California court to certify the proposed Class of 5 million workers.
UPDATE 2: On Jan. 17, 2019, around 5 million Walmart job applicants have earned Class certification of their lawsuit claiming the company added extra material to background check notifications in violation of federal law.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
64 thoughts onWalmart Class Action Says Background Checks Violate Federal Law
I work for Walmart and had a back ground check and a urine test I worked for the Walmart in Washington and Iowa
I do not work for Wal-Mart but when I when to interview I took the urine test and background check.
I am an independent vendor at Walmart and I too had to have a background check. I thought it was odd, but I have nothing to hide. Keep me informed.
Please add me to the Wal-Mart suit was not aware of discriminatory practice. Worked for the company from 2011-2014
Please add me
My son was hired then let go due to a background check that he knew nothing about.
What about the sub-contractors that clean WalMarts?? Heard that they are all ILLEGALS!!!
I worked for them twice, I need to sign this
Add me! I worked for Walmart through a temporary agency, then was offered a position in several different departments,however once my application was submitted i was terminated. I later found out through my credit report that Walmart had conducted a credit/background check without my ackowledgement.
I worked for Walmart from 2013 to 2015 unaware of this
I worked at Wal-Mart how do I sign up for this ?
The case is still moving through the courts and has not yet reached a settlement. Claim forms are usually not made available to consumers until after a court approved settlement is reached. We recommend you sign up for a free account at TopClassActions.com and follow the case. We will update the article with any major case developments or settlement news! Setting up a free account with Top Class Actions will allow you to receive instant updates on ANY article that you ‘Follow’ on our website. A link to creating an account may be found here: https://topclassactions.com/signup/. You can then ‘Follow’ the article above, and get notified immediately when we post updates!