Jon Styf  |  May 2, 2024

Category: Labor & Employment
Close up of a pen next to a Non Compete Contract document, representing the noncompete lawsuit.
(Photo Credit: William Potter/Shutterstock)

Noncompete lawsuit overview: 

  • Who: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and three other groups filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Chair Lina Khan. 
  • Why: The Chamber of Commerce is attempting to overturn the FTC’s noncompete agreement ban, stating they are reasonable and necessary to protect company investments in staff.
  • Where: The FTC lawsuit was filed in federal court in Tyler, Texas.

The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and three other groups filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Chair Lina Khan attempting to overturn the FTC’s noncompete agreement ban.

The Chamber of Commerce claims the strength of companies is their employee base, and thus companies spend large sums of money and resources to train employees. This, the chamber argues, makes noncompete clauses a reasonable and necessary tool for companies to protect their investments.

“Having invested in their people and entrusted them with valuable company secrets, businesses have strong interests in preventing others from free-riding on those investments or gaining improper access to competitive, confidential information,” the Chamber of Commerce lawsuit says. “For centuries, businesses throughout the United States have relied on reasonable noncompete agreements to protect those critical interests.”

Noncompete clauses benefit both employer and employees, Chamber of Commerce lawsuit claims

The FTC first proposed the noncompete agreement ban in January 2023.

The Chamber of Commerce is joined in its lawsuit by fellow plaintiffs the Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business and Longview Chamber of Commerce.

The plaintiffs claim noncompete agreements benefit both employers and workers because it protects employers’ sensitive information and workers get “increased training, access to more information, and an opportunity to bargain for higher pay,” the FTC lawsuit says.

Noncompete agreements have their own series of guidelines in each state to judge when the agreements are appropriate and when they go too far, the Chamber of Commerce lawsuit says.

The lawsuit argues that the federal government has never previously been directly involved in noncompete agreements and that Congress has never voted on the topic.

Have you ever been asked to sign a noncompete clause? Let us know in the comments.

The plaintiff is represented by Scott J. Ferrell of Pacific Trial Attorneys APC. 

The noncompete clause lawsuit is Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al., Case No. 6:24-cv-00148-JCB, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.