Steven Cohen  |  September 10, 2019

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

mercedes logo on vehicleA class action lawsuit has been filed against Mercedes-Benz USA by eight customers who allege that the vehicles contain a defect in the headrests which compromises the safety of the occupants.

The plaintiffs claim that an “active head restraint” (AHR) is implanted in the headrest which is supposed to spring forward if the car is involved in a rear-end collision.

The AHR is designed to catch the occupant’s head and prevent whiplash. The AHR on the Mercedes is known as the NECK-PRO.  

The Mercedes class action lawsuit states that, under normal conditions, the NECK-PRO can deploy without having an impact from a collision and hit the back of the occupant’s head.  

“The force of the impact not only causes serious bodily harm to the head and neck, but also creates a risk of collision when the headrest deploys—suddenly and without warning—while the vehicle is being driven,” the plaintiffs say.

The Mercedes class action lawsuit notes that there is a plastic piece that is inside the AHR that fails prematurely. The plaintiffs say that this piece is made of an “inferior and inexpensive form of plastic which cracks and breaks down prematurely under the constant pressure exerted by the springs in the AHR.”

The plaintiffs allege that there are at least hundreds of thousands of vehicles equipped with the defective plastic piece and there is no warning as to when the AHR in the headrest will deploy.

The Mercedes class action states that the defendants knew about the safety defect when customers started bringing in their vehicles into dealerships and from looking at consumer complaints that were filed with the National Highway Transportation Administration.  

In addition, the plaintiffs maintain that Mercedes was “intimately involved” with the testing and design of the AHR systems and were aware of the inferior plastic being used in the headrests.

“Despite this knowledge, Mercedes nevertheless approved the defective AHRs for use in its vehicles and denies that this defect exists,” the Mercedes class action complaint argues.

The plaintiffs state that regardless of knowing the dangers caused by the defect in the headrest, Mercedes has not taken any action to fix the problem and still sell cars that have the defective NECK-PRO. In addition, Mercedes reportedly hasn’t issued a recall on the defective part or contacted vehicle owners to apprise them of the defect.  

To be sure, Mercedes has refused to cover the costs of replacing the defective AHRs after they deploy and, in fact, blame the customer and deny any responsibility for the defective part, the plaintiffs say. 

In addition, the Mercedes class action lawsuit states that the defendant hides the defect in the AHR by blaming the spontaneous deployment on other problems with the car.

“Mercedes has at all relevant times, been aware of the true issue: the AHR was designed with an inferior, inappropriate, and inexpensive plastic component that breaks under the tensed force of the springs,” the plaintiffs state.

Potential Class Members in this action include: “All persons in the United States who currently own or lease, or who have owned or leased, one or more vehicles manufactured by Mercedes, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, which are equipped with headrests containing the defective AHR.”

Have you experienced the AHR suddenly deploying? Share your story in the comment section below.

The plaintiffs are represented by Benjamin Widlanski, Harley S. Tropin, Gail McQuilkin, Rachel Sullivan, and Robert J. Neary of Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton LLP, George Franjola of Gilligan Gooding Franjola & Batsel PA, Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA, and Michael Burger of Santiago Burger LLP.

The Mercedes Active Head Restraint Class Action is Lewis, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, et al., Case No. 9:19-cv-81220, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


79 thoughts onMercedes Class Action Says Active Head Restraints Suddenly Deploy

  1. Brandon Ross says:

    It happened to me 5 times. The drivers side headrest popped out and hit me in the back of the head. Each time I took it to Mercedes and was told it was fixed. I now have a herniated disc in my neck and 4 bulging discs. I would like to be added to this suit as well

  2. wayne packen says:

    My passenger side headrest restraint deployed while sitting at a light in my 2009 C300 Sport. I was not involved in a motor vehicle accident. I asked Mercedes Dealership about it, and of course it is my responsibility to pay to have it replaced. I have purchased 4 Mercedes vehicles over the last 15 years, and will never buy another. POOR DESIGN!

  3. Ebony says:

    I have the same issue. Headrest deployed while parked and clips are broken. The car has never been in any accidents.

  4. Angelica Colon says:

    Hi
    Please need to be added to this class action suit, I was a victim of the headrest – 2014 Class 350
    headrest deployment while in a rear impact. I have had severe drama to my neck, occipital area. From the impact I now have vertigo, falling and ringing in the ears. As a result of the headrest hitting the back of my head I need to have repair neck surgery – herniated disc and to correct prior cervical fusion, My life has been a total nightmare since this headrest hit the back of my head. Please need your help.. I need to be heard, have a voice. Need to file lawsuit.

  5. Mike Clark says:

    This just happened to me as well. Please add me. 2009 C300, both headrests deployed while parked in my driveway overnight.

  6. Jerry Mobley says:

    2009 C300 Orlando FL,

    Drivers side headrest deployed while setting in Parking lot, this is the Third time this has happen 8/29/2020.

  7. Brett Whiteside says:

    We have a 2015 GLK 350. The drivers side head rest deployed randomly while driving on a mountain road today in Pine, Arizona. I have serious neck pain after being struck with the head rest. The plastic did not break and we were able to slide it down and lock it back in. We are worried that this will happen again randomly. Do we just comment and wait?

  8. Sani Daher says:

    Mine on 2008 gl450 driver side deployed when I started the car

  9. John Vinas says:

    Please add mine to it. On July 17, 2020 I came out to my driveway and found the passenger side head rest on my 2010 C300 deployed for no reason and the clips are indeed broken. No impacts of any kind have occurred.

  10. M P says:

    My 2010 E 350 Mercedes headrest popped opened during a car wash. While cleaning the inside and moving the seat the headrest on the driver’s side popped open. Unable to close it and plactic items were found in the seat. Mercedes Dealership is asking for $792 to replace, that’s the part only doesn’t include labor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.