Emily Sortor  |  February 22, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

evangers-hunk-beefA judge determines that a class action lawsuit alleging Evanger’s dog food is poisonous will continue in court.

In January 2017, plaintiffs Nicole and Guy Mael, Nadine Vigliano, Britney Morea, Angela Bertucci, and Tina Wiepert field a class action lawsuit claiming that their dogs got sick after eating Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. beef products, and that the company’s dog food contained pentobarbital, a euthanizing drug.

They claimed that Evanger’s falsely advertised their products as premium, labeling their products as “100% beef,” and “human grade, USDA inspected meat.” According to the Evanger’s dog food class action lawsuit, the products are not premium and “100% beef,” as advertised.

One couple in the Evanger’s poisoned dog food class action lawsuit, the Maels, claim that they fed Evanger’s food to their five dogs for four years. Around New Year’s Eve 2016, they allegedly made a purchase of Evanger’s “Hunk of Beef” and “Pulled Beef” and fed it to their dogs.

Shortly after the dogs ate the food, the Maels say their dogs showed neurological symptoms. According to the Maels, they rushed their dogs to a veterinarian. One of their dogs died the next day, and the other four required ongoing medical care.

The Maels allege that FDA necropsy testing of the deceased dog reveled that the Evanger’s food contained large quantities of pentobarbital.

Roughly a year ago, the FDA found traces of pentobarbital in other beef products made by Evanger’s. This prompted the company to conduct a recall of these products. However, the Evanger’s contaminated dog food class action lawsuit notes that in May of last year, another dog fell ill after eating Evanger’s “Duck and Sweet Potato” food, which was not recalled with the beef products.

Evanger’s made a motion to dismiss the Evanger’s pet food class action lawsuit, claiming that in their case, the Maels and others had not sufficiently linked Evanger’s to the pentobarbital that harmed their dogs. Evanger’s also claims that the case is weakened by the fact that Maels and others are trying to draw one singular conclusion from instances that were included in the recall and ones that weren’t.

The company says that the plaintiffs “paint with too broad a brush, lumping together dogs that got sick from the recalled, tainted beef products with a dog that got sick after eating non-recalled, non-beef products.” The company claims that with this strategy, there are too many variables of the court to make an accurate determination in the case.

This week, a judge stated that the Maels had not sufficiently established that the pentobarbital that caused their dogs to fall ill was found in Evanger’s, saying that the allegedly related cases “suggest a possible relation between defendants’ Duck and Sweet Potato product and the symptoms, the amended complaint pleads no factual allegations plausibly establishing beyond mere speculation causation between the food and the symptoms.”

So, the court agrees with Evanger’s that the class action lawsuit’s case is insufficient, but has given the consumers until March 13 to amend their complaint, instead of dismissing the lawsuit altogether.

The plaintiffs are represented by Jennifer Rust Murray and Beth E. Terrell of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC and Jessica J. Sleater of Andersen Sleater Sianni LLC.

The Evanger’s Poisoned Dog Food Class Action Lawsuit is Nicole and Guy Mael, et. al. v. Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. Inc., et. al., Case No. 3:17-cv-05469, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

UPDATE: On Oct. 18, 2019, Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. agreed to pay $545,500 to end class action claims that its pet food is dangerous to animals despite being advertised as “human grade.” 

UPDATE 2: February 2020, the Evanger’s toxic dog food class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


36 thoughts onEvanger’s Must Face Poisonous Dog Food Class Action, Judge Rules

  1. Greg A. Lyons says:

    It is sad to think that Nicole Mael tried to shake down Evanger’s with a phony claim. If anyone thinks that they will be collecting from Evanger’s in this case, they might want to look of Xylitol Toxicity in Dogs. And look under Symptoms of Xylitol. You will then learn that Pentobarbital played no role in hurting any of these dogs, as they all had and suffered from a Xylitol Toxicity poisoning not Pentobarbital poisoning. Evanger’s dog and cat food company makes and will continue to make wonderful products for years to come.

  2. Deborah DuFrane says:

    Is there a case against Gravy Train yet? I fed my girl Jada the beef chunks and cheese and bacon (Gravy Train). She was put to rest Dec. 20th. Suffering, very lethargic and trouble breathing. She was suffering and struggling to breath and stay alive.

  3. Stacy Long says:

    ✔✔✔✔!!

  4. Fern says:

    ***JOE I have been waiting for someone to say something to these people who simply write “Add me” and automatically think they will receive a check. That’s okay bc it leaves more money for people who actually bought these products…. What’s even funnier is the people who continued saying “add me” after you posted your comment. LOL

    1. MountainMan says:

      Right on Joe!!! There are so many foolish people in this world I should be a Billionaire!!! But I’m Lazy…..

    2. Laurie Wyatt says:

      I was feeding this to my dogs and paying big bucks this is so sad thank God my dogs didn’t get sick but I had to return food

  5. Fern says:

    JOE**** I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR SOMEONE TO TELL ALL THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE TOO LAZY TO READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. IF THEY THINK THEY CAN JUST WRITE “ADD ME” AND GET A CHECK THAT’S HILARIOUS!! BUT THAT’S OKAY, IT LEAVES MORE MONEY FOR THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY BUY THESE PRODUCTS AND AREN’T ONLY LOOKING FOR A FREE HANDOUT. .. BUT WHAT’S EVEN FUNNIER IS ALL THE IDIOTS THAT CONTINUED TO WRITE “ADD ME” AFTER YOU POSTED YOUR COMMENT. LOL

  6. E.C. PHILLIPS says:

    add me

  7. Chester Wells says:

    Please add me.

  8. Jose Ramirez says:

    its like the Blue Buffalo case where everyone says add me then asked to show proof of purchase or a vet bill for a related issue in the related time period. Then they all go away. Sounds like this case is one stop short of being dismissed.

  9. Brenda Palmer says:

    Add my name

  10. Stanley Conley says:

    Add me please.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.