Paul Tassin  |  June 19, 2017

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

evangers-hunk-beefA Washington couple says one of their dogs died and the other four became seriously ill after eating Evanger’s pet food laced with pentobarbital.

Defendants Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. and Nutripack LLC are both based in Illinois and are both owned by members of the Sher family. Evanger’s makes premium pet food at its two facilities in Wheeling and Markham, Ill.

The company markets its own products under the Evanger’s and Against the Grain brands, and it also manufactures products sold by other companies under brands like Party Animal.

Plaintiffs Nicole and Guy Mael allege Evanger’s pet foods fall far short of the company’s representations. Evanger’s allegedly represents its pet foods as premium products, with ingredient indicators like “100% beef” and “human grade, USDA inspected meat.”

The products don’t match those advertisements at all, the Maels claim. What’s more, they allege some Evanger’s pet foods actually contain pentobarbital – a drug that the Maels say is used to euthanize animals, execute humans and to conduct physician-assisted suicide.

The Maels say that for four years, they purchased Evanger’s pet foods for their five dogs. Nicole says she made such a purchase on New Year’s Eve 2016, including cans of Hunk of Beef and Pulled Beef. Shortly after the dogs ate the Evanger’s dog food, they all began showing acute neurological symptoms, the Maels allege. They rushed their dogs to a veterinarian for emergency care.

One of their dogs, Talula, died the next day. The other four dogs recovered but required ongoing veterinary care. Their dog Tito continues to require anti-seizure medication, the plaintiffs say.

Not content to accept Talula’s death sitting down, the plaintiffs contacted the FDA and arranged for a necropsy to be conducted at an Oregon State University facility. The necropsy could not rule out neurotoxicocis as the cause of death until the contents of Talula’s stomach could be tested.

The FDA then requested testing of Talula’s stomach contents and the remaining food in the can of Hunk of Beef at a Michigan State University facility. That testing confirmed that both samples contained large quantities of pentobarbital, the Evanger’s class action states.

Later, FDA testing of the other cans of Hunk of Beef also revealed an “abundant amount” of pentobarbital. The plaintiffs claim that the same drug was also discovered in Evanger’s-manufactured pet foods sold under the Against the Grain brand.

In addition to losing Talula, the Maels say they have incurred more than $6,000 in veterinary expenses. They now spend $100 per week making their own pet food at home to avoid putting their remaining dogs in danger.

Further investigation by the FDA allegedly revealed that, contrary to the representations in Evanger’s promotional materials, the company has been using ingredients that were designated unfit for human consumption. The FDA also confirmed that none of Evanger’s facilities are registered for USDA inspection.

The Maels seek to represent a plaintiff Class composed of all persons who purchased the defendants’ pet foods within the U.S. between June 16, 2013 and the present.

They are seeking compensations for their own and other Class Members’ losses, including coverage of the cost of veterinary care and future monitoring, the value of any animals that have died and any costs associated with their deaths. They also seek a court order barring the defendants from continuing the allegedly false advertising at issue.

The Maels’ attorneys are Beth E. Terrell and Jennifer Rust Murray of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC.

The Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit is Nicole and Guy Mael v. Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. Inc. and Nutripack LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-05469, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

UPDATE: On Feb. 20, 2018, a judge determined that a class action lawsuit alleging Evanger’s dog food is poisonous will continue in court.

UPDATE 2: On Oct. 18, 2019, Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. agreed to pay $545,500 to end class action claims that its pet food is dangerous to animals despite being advertised as “human grade.” 

UPDATE 3: February 2020, the Evanger’s toxic dog food class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

10 thoughts onEvanger’s Pet Food Class Action Says Dogs Poisoned by ‘Premium’ Food

  1. Tracy says:

    This is why I cook for my dogs.

  2. Barbara Francis says:

    My dog Pete at 10 years old ate one bowl of Kibble and Bits dry dog food and was dead 4 days later.He wouldn’t eat it after that one time and the other dog not at all. Bloody diarrhea and just laid there. Couldn’t get up and just died. Vet smelled food and said it smelled like chemicals, I agreed it really did. $85 vet bill and my dog is gone!

  3. Alyce Riendeau says:

    I still have a case of this product

  4. Nicholas Hoffman says:

    Evangers already reimbursed me for my vet bill. Does that bar me from joining a suit?

  5. Sandra Havens says:

    I have been talking my dog to the vet a lot and found out that they wanted me to change her food, she kept getting sick. Like 6 times or more. She’s been eating Kibble and bits and for her treats she would get Canine Carry Outs. So now I ready what was really going on. I am so thankful for the Vet that told me to change her food Diet. Other wise she would be dead by now. please please sign me up for the law suit. They owe me for the 6 times I had to take her to the vet when she was sick. And they ran test but couldn’t find it. But they did Advise me to Change her Diet. And to give her different dog food. Please I want to join this. I am already a member of the Class Action Law Suit sight. THANK YOU.

  6. Sandra Havens says:

    I just found out that the reason my dog had been sick off and on was because I was feeding her kibble, not Bits and for a treat I was giving her Canine Carryouts. Wtf. Are they trying to kill my dog my companion. I finely took her to the vet and they told me to change here dog food and treats. I have just been given her the new stuff and she’s doing much better now. No more being sick. And what I give her now is not on the list made by Smuckers. So please sign me up for this law suit. I believe that they owe me for the vet bills every time she got sick. Thank you. I am registered with class Action Law suit.

  7. Jean Conrad says:

    They must hate our dogs. shame on them!

  8. Debbie Edwards says:

    I bought it in June of 2016 and gave it to one of my 3 standard poodles – a short while later he began showing signs as if he was dying. He couldn’t stand up, his eyes were rolling back in his head. He wasn’t alert and was going limp. I kept shaking him gently and talking to him and holding him, trying to keep him with me, trying to get his eyes to focus…..I went to the ER vet and they had no idea what was wrong with him. An emergency came in while we were waiting for a test result and so we ended up having to wait for many hours. As time went by he slowly became more alert, then he slowly was able to stand again….it was the strangest thing I ever saw and the vet thought so too. I had him checked a week later by my mobile vet and he said the same thing, that it was very odd symptoms and made no sense. He came back to full function thank God. It wasn’t until I heard about this food issue I made the connection and now it all makes sense, he really was on the edge of dying. I have the vet bills to prove this. I remember clearly buying Evangers because it cost more and I thought it would be an upgrade for him as he is getting older and was 10 at the time.

  9. Calvin Glover says:

    I bought 24 cans

    1. Sandra Havens says:

      Get rid of them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.