The class action watchdog Center for Class Action Fairness has filed an objection to the Equifax data breach class action settlement, claiming that the attorney fee request should be reduced and that the settling parties suppressed the claims process.

Equifax settled the case in July 2019 in what is considered one of the largest data breaches of personal and financial information in American history.

The objection, filed in Georgia federal court by Ted Frank and David Watkins, states that Class counsel structured the settlement and claims process unfairly which will deter objections and stifle monetary claims.

Frank is the Director of Litigation and Senior Attorney at the Center for Class Action Fairness, which is a part of the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute.

The objection states that “there are fundamental intraclass conflicts regarding statutory-damages claims that require separate subclassing and separate counsel.”



The Equifax settlement includes a single Class of around 147 million customers whose personal information was stolen due to a data breach in September 2017. 

The objection filed by Frank and Watkins states that the court ruled that the plaintiffs would be able to go forward with data breach claims from 25 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. In addition, the court stated that the plaintiffs could proceed with claims from consumer protection statutes from 33 states, including the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands.

“Rule 23(a)(4) requires class members with different statutory claims to be subclassed with separate representation so that a group of class members’ claims are not favored at the expense of another’s,” the objection states.

In addition, the objection notes that Class Members should have representatives and Class attorneys who are not conflicted. Frank says the Equifax settlement involves dozens of different statutes that vary in the amount of available damages.

“Without separate counsel to help press their most compelling case, their respective subgroups could not maximize the litigation values of their statutory claims,” Frank states.



In addition, the court documents state that the requirements for objecting to the settlement are too burdensome and were designed to lower the number of objections that are filed.

First, the settlement requires that any individual who would like to object to the settlement must provide four dates between Nov. 19, 2019 and Dec. 5, 2019 when they would be available to be deposed.

Also, objectors are required to identify all class actions that they have objected to within the past five years.

In addition, Frank argues that Class counsel’s fee request should be reduced and the excess amounts should be returned to the Class. He states that the fee request of 21 percent of the settlement amount is more than twice the average percentage awarded in settlements of this size.

Frank argues that “while the settlement may be the ‘largest data breach settlement in history,’ that is only because of the class size” and not because of the amount of money that each Class Member will receive.



The Equifax data breach settlement initially offered Class Members a choice of either $125 in cash or 10 years of credit monitoring. However, the Federal Trade Commission has warned that due to an “overwhelming” and “unexpected” amount of Class Members filing claims, those choosing the cash option are expected to receive an amount that’s a lot lower than $125. 

Do you think the Equifax data breach settlement is fair? Leave a message in the comments section below.

The plaintiffs are represented by co-lead counsel Amy Keller of DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC, Kenneth Canfield of Doffermyre Shields Canfield & Knowles LLC and Norman Siegel of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP. Barnes Law Group LLC and Evangelista Worley LLC  serve as co-liaison counsel. Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Girard Gibbs LLP, Hausfeld LLP, Tadler Law LLP, Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group, Murphy Falcon & Murphy and The Doss Firm LLC are on the plaintiffs’ steering committee. Griffin & Strong PC serves as state court coordinating counsel.

The Equifax Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit is In re: Equifax Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:17-md-02800, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

UPDATE: On Dec. 20, 2019, a federal judge gave a $425 million Equifax class action settlement final approval despite objections from consumer advocacy groups.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

167 Comments

  • Irvin Caraway II January 15, 2020

    They are a crooks shouldnt have had our info anyways..The crooked Judge Thrash has placed the Civil Lawsuits as Administrated closed which is only used in Immigration cases. After Equifax couldnt answer to the complaint.

  • Venita Murray January 8, 2020

    I have applied for the freeze my account. Please include me to the settlement

  • JAB or BKB December 25, 2019

    No it is not fair. I have suffered a lot of financial loss in excess pf just good credit now ruined. I have had over $80,000 stolen, two vehicles stolen, bank accounts closed, credit union accounts closed, house burglarized, and attorneys that have also stolen more than $80,000 also. Through their fraud and ID theft and closed accounts and then burglaries after incarceration. $125 doesn’t begin to address the short falls.I will never recover from.

  • Kelly Turner December 19, 2019

    I have never objected to any amendment any class action lawsuit I was affected along with my sister brother-in-law mother and father our whole family was affected by this this is totally unfair although I’m available at any time to be deposed, the other members of my family who were affected are not available at any time, except on weekends. None of my family members have ever been involved in a class-action lawsuit or an amendment or objection to one please feel free to contact me anytime

    • Kelly Turner December 19, 2019

      Also all of my family signed up, after we entered our social security numbers and they verified that we were affected, all of us were, all verified

  • Albert Utzinger December 16, 2019

    Please add me this is the first I seen this class action.

1 14 15 16

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts