Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Amazon Ring doorbell camera data privacy letter overview:
- Who: Amazon has responded to an inquiry by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) into how it protects the data privacy of its Ring doorbell camera users.
- Why: Amazon disclosed it has turned over the Ring doorbell camera footage to police 11 times this year without a warrant or without first receiving consent from the user.
- Where: Amazon Ring doorbell cameras are used by consumers nationwide.
Amazon disclosed in a letter addressed to a Democratic senator earlier this month that it gave police access to video surveillance captured by Ring doorbell cameras without the permission of their users almost a dozen times already this year, raising privacy concerns.
The disclosure was made in response to a letter sent to Amazon by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in which he asked the company to explain how it protects the privacy rights of its Ring doorbell users.
At the center of Markey’s concern was Amazon Ring’s Neighbors Public Safety Service, which police agencies can use to request access to Ring recordings in the event they could be helpful in law enforcement investigations.
“Notably, reports indicate that multiple police departments have attempted to bypass Ring’s video request process, including by gaining direct access to user footage in real time,” Markey wrote.
The senator also argued law enforcement being able to access Amazon Ring camera footage helped proliferate the circumventing of “key systems of public accountability.”
“Ring enables police surveillance without public cost, debate or approval,” Markey wrote.
Ring says it does not provide ‘unfettered access’ to customer data, video
Ring, meanwhile, says it follows the law regarding customer data or video access.
“It’s simply untrue that Ring gives anyone unfettered access to customer data or video, as we have repeatedly made clear to our customers and others,” a Ring spokesperson said in an email to Top Class Actions. “The law authorizes companies like Ring to provide information to government entities if the company believes that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person, such as a kidnapping or an attempted murder, requires disclosure without delay. Ring faithfully applies that legal standard.”
Amazon says its Neighborhood Public Safety Service works with more than 2,100 law enforcement agencies and 455 fire departments around the country.
Amazon Ring doorbell cameras were at the center of a class action lawsuit filed last year over claims the product has a battery life that is shorter than what was expected at purchase.
A separate class action lawsuit was also filed against Amazon earlier this year over allegations the Ring doorbell camera has a hidden monthly service fee which a user must pay for the device to work effectively.
Do you own an Amazon Ring doorbell camera? What do you think of the data privacy concerns? Let us know in the comments!
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
22 thoughts onAmazon Ring inquiry examines data privacy issues in providing footage to police
I have two ring Amazon doorbells one for my front door one for my back door and I was not aware before I bought it that there was a subscription fee that we had to pay do utilize this device I was not aware of a lot of hidden features in this device I was unaware that Please share our data and videos with the police or any other easy for that matter please add me I’m very upset
I do have a ring on my front door. In reading this lawsuit I am now concerned about privacy. I bought this for protection not for my daily life to be accessed. I also was not aware of any hidden fees.
Add me
Add me I have 2 Ring doorbells
Rain gave out my personal information and video to the Chester police department without my consent
The ring is only for show it doesn’t capture anything illegal only people walking or driving by. I have proof it happened to me and my neighbors. Add us!!
Please add me I believe my ring was given asses to without my consent
Add me
Please add me
I’m an Amazon delivery driver and I think I should be paid $45 an hour with added cameras in my face! Recording in progress!
Never again !!
Add me please