Anna Bradley-Smith  |  June 24, 2021

Category: Electronics

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Philips sleep and respiratory care devices contain chemicals that put users at risk of carcinogenic effects, inflammation, irritation, and more, a new class action lawsuit alleges.
(Photo Credit: oleschwander/Shutterstock)

Philips sleep and respiratory care devices contain chemicals that put users at risk of carcinogenic effects, inflammation, irritation, and more, a new class action lawsuit alleges.

The Philips class action lawsuit was filed in Massachusetts on June 17 by lead Plaintiff Nick Manna, who alleges Philips endangered its consumers, sold worthless devices, and unreasonably delayed a recall.

According to the class action lawsuit, Philips Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (Bi-Level PAP), Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), and mechanical ventilator devices all contain polyester-based polyurethane sound abatement foam which can degrade and release toxins into users’ airways.

A recall notice for the devices said that they could cause skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritation, an inflammatory response, headaches, asthma, adverse effects to other organs (e.g. kidneys and liver), and toxic carcinogenic effects.

“Philips further noted that it had received specific complaints from Recalled Devices users as suffering from ‘headache[s], upper airway irritation, cough, chest pressure and sinus infection’,” the Philips class action lawsuit states.

Manna, who owns a Philips DreamStation CPAP, was informed by his physician in June that his CPAP device was subject to a recall due to the presence of the sound abatement foam that could cause him to suffer from adverse health effects, including cancer, the class action lawsuit says.

“Plaintiff Manna must now incur substantial expenses to replace the device,” the class action lawsuit says.

In the June 14 recall, Philips noted that sound abatement foam used was at risk for degradation into particles which may enter the device’s pathway and be ingested or inhaled by users of the affected devices.

The CPAP and BiPAP devices are common nonsurgical treatments primarily used to treat sleep apnea, that involve the use of a nasal or facemask device to maintain air pressure in an individual’s airway. Philips’ CPAP and BiPAP respirator devices typically cost several hundred, if not thousands of dollars, and between three and four million of the devices have been recalled due to the toxic sound abatement foam.

“Individuals not using life-supporting ventilators must discontinue their use of the Recalled Devices or face health risks as grave as cancer. If they choose to discontinue use they must either pay for another expensive device in order to receive effective treatment,” the Philips class action states.

Manna wants to represent a nationwide Class of consumers who own one of the recalled devices, and also Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania subclasses. He is suing for negligence, breach of contract, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranties, and breaches of various state consumer protection laws, and seeks certification of the class, injunctive relief, damages, interest, legal fees, and a jury trial.

Have you ever used a CPAP or BiPAP device? Did you notice any sound abatement foam in your device? Let us know in the comments section or see if you qualify to join this CPAP lawsuit investigation!

Manna is represented by Sean K. McElligott, Richard A. Silver, Steven L. Bloch, Ian W. Sloss, Zachary A. Rynar of Silver Golub & Teitell LLP.

The Philips Sleep Apnea Device Class Action Lawsuit is Manna v. Koninkelijke Philips N.V., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-11017, in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts.


Don’t Miss Out!

Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!


Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

228 thoughts onPhilips Endangered Consumers With Its Sleep and Respiratory Care Devices, Class Action Alleges

  1. Judy says:

    I have used one of the Phillips BiPap machines on the list for several years. I have headaches in the morning and a cough that I didn’t have before getting the machine.
    Please add me

  2. Michelle L. Berry says:

    I have had my machine for 4-5 years now. I have been plagued with sinus issues and upper respiratory problem for a long while. My machine is also on the recall list. You fill everything out on the Phillips web site then nothing from the company. I even went to their Twitter page and made a remark – but nothing.

  3. Kim Marshall says:

    Please add me to your list. I didn’t even know my machine was recalled and have been having headaches and congestion for years.

  4. James Penny says:

    I have one of the recalled machines. Had an eye irritated, a cough, and sinus issues.

  5. Becky Winters says:

    I have one machine. It’s 3/4 years old. It is one the list.
    I’ve always felt life the air seemed not fresh. Keep my machine cleaned. I used humidification with it. Now I worry about that with with lose foam.
    I would like to see what the inside looks like.
    I figure they will collect them when they send something else.
    Do I want theirs?
    Please add my name.

  6. Harvey J Shaler says:

    Have been using a recalled Phillips machine for years. Many symptoms, please add.

    1. Ernest Smith says:

      I use the Phillips respononics C PAP. I have had difficulty with my sinuses and a cough that won’t go away

  7. Anthony Jones says:

    I have the machine now. I have had it for 3 years and I have to have it to sleep

  8. Joana Dumas says:

    I’ve had my machine almost a year. I cough in my sleep almost every night.

  9. John L says:

    Both of my units are noted on the recall. 8 Years of exposure.
    This is beyond negligence, it’s criminal.

  10. anthony kim says:

    same

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.