Christina Spicer  |  December 5, 2018

Category: Auto News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

The plaintiffs in a Nissan engine defect class action lawsuit contend that their proposed Class should be certified.

The proposed Class would consist of Nissan owners and lessees nationwide who were affected by an alleged engine defect in various 2004-2010 Altima, Quest, Maxima, Frontier, Xterra and Pathfinder vehicles.

The plaintiffs claim that thousands of drivers were affected by the alleged timing chain defect, costing them money, time, and energy to manage.

“[Nissan’s] unlawful conduct has caused plaintiffs and other class members to suffer damages,” stated the motion for certification in the Nissan engine defect class action lawsuit. “Had plaintiffs and other class members known about [timing chain system] defects they would not have purchased their class vehicle at the price they did, if at all.”

The plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased or leased one of several makes and models of allegedly defective Nissans, including 2004-2006 Nissan Altimas, 2004-2009 Nissan Quests, 2004-2008 Nissan Maximas, 2005-2010 Nissan Frontiers, 2005-2010 Nissan Xterras, and 2005-2010 Nissan Pathfinders.

The plaintiffs also seek to represent statewide Classes of consumers from Massachusetts, Texas, Colorado, and Oregon.

“Each Plaintiff who seeks to serve as class representative for their respective state and National Class has standing to assert alleged claims; is a consumer owner/lessee of a Class Vehicle with a failed TCS due to the alleged TCS defects; purchased their Class Vehicle in the same state as the owners and lessees in the state Subclass they seek to represent; and has suffered out-of-pocket damages,” states the plaintiffs’ motion for certification of the Class.

According to the Nissan engine defect class action lawsuit lodged against the car maker in 2016, a plastic part of the timing chain system in certain vehicles wears away prematurely – leading to expensive repairs that Nissan allegedly refuses to cover.

The plaintiffs say that the defective timing chain manifests itself in loud engine noises and even catastrophic engine failure. The alleged defect can result in sudden deceleration or stopping while in motion – presenting a serious safety concern.

The Nissan class action lawsuit contends that the car maker failed to disclose the defect, despite warning Nissan dealers. Further, Nissan refused to fix problems caused by the defect under its warranties, say the plaintiffs.

The Nissan engine defect class action lawsuit has been trimmed of consumer protection claims based on certain state laws, including those in North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, and Colorado, because of the statutes of limitations in those states.

Further, class action claims of breach of implied warranty were dropped by a federal judge for the same reasons.

The Nissan class action lawsuit is seeking “relatively modest damages” on behalf their proposed Class, according to the plaintiffs’ motion for certification, including reimbursement as well as declaratory relief.

The plaintiffs are represented by Adam M. Stewart of Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Gary S. Graifman and Jay I. Brody of Kantrowitz Goldhamer & Graifman PC, and Howard Longman and Patrick Slyne of Stull Stull & Brody.

The Nissan Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Duncan, et al. v. Nissan North America Inc., et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-12120, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

UPDATE: On Feb. 14, 2020, Nissan has agreed to pay $6 million to settle the Nissan engine defect class action lawsuit. Learn more here.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

40 thoughts onNissan Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification

  1. William Uttz says:

    Tennessee: 2006 Pathfinder VQ40DE engine, defective timing chain

    Estimate to replace $1800 to $2300

  2. Robert Hartsell says:

    Add me, 2005 Maxima, automatic. It has the timing chain part that has worn and needs replaced. Also I’ve got the defective transmission in my car that jerks when shifting and the torque converter vibrates upon acceleration. The front end braking system is out of round, rotors develop hot spots and shakes and shimmy’s when I apply the brakes. I’ve replaced rotors twice and the symptom still comes back.

    1. Top Class Actions says:

      The case is still moving through the courts and has not yet reached a settlement. Claim forms are usually not made available to consumers until after a court approved settlement is reached. Setting up a free account with Top Class Actions will allow you to receive instant updates on ANY article that you ‘Follow’ on our website. A link to creating an account may be found here: https://topclassactions.com/signup/. You can then ‘Follow’ the article above, and get notified immediately when we post updates!

  3. Reena Kumar says:

    Add me 2005 Nissan Murano. Defective vehicle!!!

  4. Lori A. Worrell says:

    Please add me!!!!
    2009 Nissan Altima engine problems, loud rattling noises and ticking sound while driving, even just around town.
    This as well as the CVT, when accelerating at low speed, it whines out and feels as if it will not go.

  5. Jessie urbina says:

    2007 Altima please help!!

  6. Larry n says:

    05’ frontier crew cab count me in

  7. Lacayo Larry says:

    05’ frontier crew cab count me in

  8. Brent says:

    I’m a 2006 xterra owner how do I sign up

  9. Nikki says:

    Please add me!!! Engine and transmission problems since I’ve gotten my 2005 Maxima. Would love to have it fixed!!!

  10. Vivian Jennings says:

    Same happened with 2003 altima. Include us, please. They heard timing chains and insisted it wasnt until warranty ran out!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.