Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Since the coronavirus pandemic hit and people across the country have been working from home more, and gathering with friends and family in-person less, Zoom’s webchat and virtual meeting services have become so popular the company’s name now doubles as a verb.
Can we Zoom? Let’s Zoom tomorrow. We’ll go over that when we Zoom.
One segment of the population isn’t getting the same benefit from Zoom as the rest, though, according to a recent class action lawsuit: the deaf and hearing-impaired.
The free version of Zoom does not include closed captioning services. For that, a Zoom user has to upgrade to a paid subscription. The policy is the subject of a new class action lawsuit that has been filed by two hearing-impaired men who say Zoom is running afoul of the law by withholding services to the disabled.
Russell Kane of New York and Christopher Myers of California say they rely on auxiliary aids and services, interpreters, video remote interpreting communication software and closed captioning to function as independent persons.
Zoom, meanwhile, “requires hearing-impaired individuals to purchase additional technology to participate fully in the services it offers,” their class action lawsuit says. “While the defendant already possesses the technology to support the closed captioning software, the services can cost $200.00 per hour or higher.”
Kane and Myers say they have used Zoom’s video conferencing in the past, but their only option was to attempt lip reading during the sessions.
The class action lawsuit accuses Zoom of violating Title III of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York Human Rights Laws, and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.
The class action cites a letter written by Assistant U.S. Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd in 2018 that “confirmed that public accommodations must make the websites they own, operate, or control equally accessible to individuals with disabilities.”
Kane and Myers are asking the Court to certify their case as a class action lawsuit that would represent tens of thousands of deaf or hearing-impaired consumers who have also been harmed by Zoom’s refusal to offer closed captioning for free as part of their basic, no-cost web meeting services.
“[Zoom’s] discrimination sends a message that it is acceptable for service providers to adopt policies, procedures, and practices that deprive deaf and hearing-impaired individuals of the opportunity to fully participate in its services,” the class action lawsuit argues.
Kane and Myers say the paywall between them and Zoom’s closed captioning services is particularly burdensome given the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, and given the fact that those living with disabilities are at high risk for contracting COVID-19.
The disabled population has been encouraged to stay at home as much as possible, which has made access to tools that allow them to work from home and to stay in contact with loved ones vital.
“This underscores the importance of access to online services, such as the defendant’s video conferencing platform, for this especially vulnerable population,” the class action lawsuit says. “For many disabled individuals, they are relying on the defendant’s video services for contact with friends and family – a service that is free for those who can hear, but requires a surcharge for the hearing-impaired.”
Are you a deaf or hearing-impaired person who has struggled to make use of Zoom’s web meeting services because of the cost barriers to accessing closed captioning? Tell us about it in the comment section below.
Lead plaintiffs Kane and Myers and the proposed Class Members are represented by Scott A. Kamber of KamberLaw, LLC and Benjamin J. Sweet, Alison Bernal and Margaret Parker of Nye, Stirling, Hale & Miller, LLP.
The Closed Captioning Class Action Lawsuit is Russell Kane, et al. v. Zoom Video Communications Inc., et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-06136, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
54 thoughts onZoom Class Action Lawsuit Says Hearing-Impaired Users Charged for Closed Captioning Service
I’m a hearing impaired nurse who is Vice President of a Multisport club that does zoom meetings and I am also part of a weekly Bible study group that uses zoom. It is so hard for me to get much out of my meetings and it is also SO draining to try to hear and lipread on zoom.
I am Deafblind and am able to use zoom with captions with a braille display. I have been asking and researching for months to try and figure out how to get captions to work for some meetings when their are no captions available. They knew and could have fixed this 8 months ago. ADD ME.
I’ve been pulling my hair out for months trying to figure out how to get captions I can afford (I can’t.) while wondering why I have to pay a “Deaf Tax” to access what everyone else gets for free — connecting with people with Zoom. Because I Blue Tooth the audio directly into my hearing aids to get my best-possible speech recognition, I can’t even (pay for) and use services like Otter.ai to supplement what I hear (and help correct what I mishear), because the AI transcription serves rely on the computer’s audio-output to generate transcriptions — and I don’t have external sound because it’s all going into my hearing aids.
I live alone, am over 70, and have risk factors that leave me very cautious about leaving my house — for almost a year now! Zoom is what everyone in the normal-hearing world relies on, but the lack of captions leaves me unnecessarily isolated. That’s been really hard on my mental health and my social networks.
I’m sure someone is making a bunch of money by hiding captioning behind paywalls that most deaf and hearing-impaired people can’t afford. But exploiting disabled people and disregarding access is indecent and inhuman. And contrary to ADA. Sign me up!
Please add to action
I, too, would benefit greatly from captions on Zoom. No one charges people in wheelchairs to go up a ramp!! Ellen
I am hard of hearing and depend on lip reading when captions are unavailable. I miss out on important details because of this. People with hearing loss should not lack access on Zoom because of something out of their control. Board meetings and church services mean next to nothing without captioning. Access should be equitable for all.
As a person with a hearing loss I am dependent on captioning for the clear understanding of the content. I know computer generated captions are not always accurate, at least we can hopefully gather enough information to put the pieces together for the full content.
I’m a hospital pharmacist with a hearing loss and all our work meetings and continuing education training are via Zoom without captions. I also have a home based business where most of the meetings and training are delivered via zoom without captions. Please include me in this. Thank you.
For the Deaf and Hard of Hearing people, accurate and synchronous close captioning is like ramps for wheelchair users. We need accurate and synchronous close captioning everywhere and everyday to make communication accessible for all. If ZOOM is offering a free platform for users, that same free platform should be equally accessible to the Deaf and Hard of Hearing by including accurate and synchronous close captioning.
Please add me.
I’m a teacher and lost out on several professional development trainings regarding teaching virtual that were conducted using zoom. I missed out on crucial training while we were all home March to June. I also missed out on further training opportunities during the summer simply because the trainings was conducted on Zoom.