Steven Cohen  |  May 25, 2020

Category: Covid-19

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

swimmers in Ironman Race

A class action lawsuit has been filed against promoters of the Ironman and Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon Series for not providing refunds during COVID-19.

Plaintiff Mikaela Ellenwood says that she registered for the Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon Series half-marathon race in San Francisco, California, which was supposed to take place on April 5, 2020. She claims that she paid $89.00 (plus a $14.99 processing fee) to participate in the race.

On March 14, 2020 the defendants, including World Triathlon Corporation (WTC), Competitor Group Holdings, and Competitor Group Incorporated (CGI), notified her that, based on executive orders from the government, the Ironman race would not be taking place as planned on April 5, 2020.

On May 6, 2020, Ellenwood claims she was notified that the event was being entirely cancelled opposed to postponed. She says the defendants told her that her registration would be deferred and she would be able to participate in the next Ironman race, which is scheduled to take place on April 4, 2021.

The plaintiff maintains that she is a resident of Colorado and made arrangements to specifically participate in this year’s Ironman race. Ellenwood claims the defendant has breached their contractual agreement and that she should be provided a refund for the cancelled event.

Ellenwood says that, because of the coronavirus, the defendants have attempted to reschedule or postpone many of the Ironman races that were scheduled to take place in 2020. However, the defendants have allegedly refused to provide a refund for cancelled events, forcing Class Members to participate in another event rescheduled later in 2020, re-register for a race in a different city for 2021 or defer their participation to 2021.

“As a result of the postponement or cancellation, Defendants have not delivered the events for which Plaintiff and members of the class paid,” the Ironman Race 2020 class action lawsuit avers.

Ellenwood states that many participants may not be able to make arrangements for participation in an Ironman Race rescheduled for later in 2020. The options provided by the defendants are not equivalent to what the plaintiff and Class Members have bargained for and thus, the plaintiff seeks a refund for the cancelled event.

Ellenwood goes on to say the race organizers should not be permitted to force the plaintiff to bear the financial burden of the cancelled events as a result of the coronavirus. In addition, the defendants do not have any legal entitlement to retain the monies paid for regarding the Ironman race 2020.

“Defendants’ refusal to offer refunds to Plaintiff and members of the class is simply a maneuver by Defendants to maintain revenue and profit, regardless of whether paying customers can actually attend, and participate in, rescheduled or postponed events,” the Ironman race class action lawsuit explains.

Ellenwood states that in order to participate in an Ironman event, participants register online months in advance. She says that many participants travel to the events and make the necessary arrangements ahead of time to be able to participate in an event for a specific weekend.

Ironman race participants calculating race bills.The cost of the events range from $30 to nearly $1,000, the plaintiff notes. In addition, many registrants have likely paid additional money for travel and accommodation expenses as well and it is clear that the plaintiff and Class Members bargained for the participation in the event, in the city, and on the date for which they signed up.

Ellenwood complains that the defendants have failed to offer any refund option to her and the other Class Members and have instead unilaterally rescheduled events. The plaintiff says that the defendant’s response to the pandemic is neither flexible or understanding of participants’ concerns. 

“Ironically, by failing to provide a full refund, Defendants completely limit the flexibility of Plaintiff and members of the class and force them to decide whether or not they can attend and get accommodations for a different event,” the Ironman race class action lawsuit states.

Common questions of law and fact in the Ironman race class action lawsuit are: 1) whether the defendants are required to give a refund, rather than allow class members to participate in a future event; 2) whether the defendants’ conduct breaches the contracts formed between Class Members and the defendants; and 3) whether the plaintiff and Class Members are entitled to injunctive relief, damages, or attorneys’ fees.

Prospective Class Members include: “All persons in the United States who registered for and purchased access to an Iroman or Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon Series event scheduled to take place in 2020 which was postponed or cancelled, and who were not provided a refund.”

Were you supposed to attend an event that was canceled without a refund due to COVID-19? Get legal help by clicking here.

The plaintiff is represented by Nathan C. Zipperian of Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller, & Shah and John F. Edgar and Michael R. Owens of Edgar Law Firm, LLC.

The Ironman Race Class Action Lawsuit is Mikaela Ellenwood v. World Triathlon Corporation, et al., Case No. 8:20-cv-01182, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Join a Free Coronavirus Failure to Refund Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you are still being charged for a flight, event or service even though it was canceled due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus public health emergency, you may be entitled to compensation.

Join Here

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


30 thoughts onIronman Race Class Action Alleges Denied COVID-19 Refunds

  1. Teresa Wallace says:

    Add me

  2. Karen Wilson says:

    Add me

  3. Dave says:

    Based on Ironmans decision to keep all the money, I wouldn’t be signing up for any future events with them ever again. They should at least offered partial refunds or credit towards future races.

  4. George Fair says:

    All I know is , read the waiver before you register. Even with the insurance option ,it’s pretty one sided. I had an injury 3 weeks before IMFL which kept me from racing.. No refund and too late to defer.
    Not happy , but I knew what I signed up for.
    This organization still puts on the best race.If you don’t like it , don’t sign up quite simply. I hate whiners.

  5. Jennifer says:

    Did you miss the part about no refunds when you registered? We are all out $ for cancelled races but I don’t expect $ back! I agreed to the policy when I registered.

    1. Sophie Le says:

      Actually, if they cancel the race, the fine print says they will refund. I even bought cancellation insurance and not RnR is not responding to me at all. What they even do is “postpone” without a future date set (essentially cancelling) to get out of trying to refund.

      It’s unethical. ADD ME!

  6. Elizabeth Dahme says:

    What???? Put Ironman out of business for a natural disaster? I would rather them keep my money and live to race again. Very short sighted.

  7. Peg says:

    Bad idea. Put Ironman out of business because of an Act of God??

  8. Amanda says:

    THANK YOU! Mikaela, I applaud you for this. It’s about time- Ironman has been treating their racers like this for many, many years. I also registered for the SF Rock and Roll Marathon this year and also asked them for a refund and they refused. If nothing else, I hope this forces someone in that corporation to reevaluate their practices.

    1. Susan says:

      This will set a precedent that will put all race companies out of business. You applaud someone who signs and agrees to a policy and then decides she doesn’t want to follow it? And wants to end racing as we know it over $90? If you don’t like the way a company treats their racers don’t race with them. People like you are absolutely what is wrong with the world. Self absorbed, short sighted and entitled.

  9. Ron says:

    Did said Plaintiff sign a “no refund” waiver or not? Yes. Yes they did.

  10. Susan says:

    What kind of entitled, ignorant, asshat sues someone over $90 amid a global pandemic? I sincerely hope for her sake this is the biggest issue she faces in this crisis.

    1. Bobbi says:

      Ironman is a $700 million company. Events should have their own insurance as well. There is no reason they should keep the money.

      1. Susan says:

        No insurance policy will cover this. And its not about the $700 million company, it is about setting a precedent that will put many other race companies (that are not worth $700 million) out of business. And every other organization, racing or not, gave people credits or postponements– airlines, Disney, concerts, etc. Why should this be any different?

      2. Anthony Robinson says:

        Bobbi. Do us all a favor: STFU. You have zero idea what you’re talking about.

      3. Daniel says:

        Paid $330 for a 70.3 ironman. They can keep $75 of it. Give me back $255.

1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.