Class action alleges major tire manufacturers engage in price-fixing

Tire class action lawsuit overview:

• Who: Plaintiff Michele Edwards filed a class action lawsuit against Bridgestone, Continental, Goodyear, Michelin and other major tire manufacturers.
• Why: Tire manufacturers allegedly engaged in a price-fixing conspiracy by artificially inflating the price of replacement tires.
• Where: The tire price-fixing lawsuit was filed in New York federal court.
• How to find help: Consumers who bought tires for resale directly from the manufacturer or from one of the manufacturers’ retail outlets or online sites in the last four years may qualify to participate in a price-fixing lawsuit investigation.

Some of the world’s largest tire manufacturers conspired to artificially inflate tire prices by taking advantage of conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recent price-fixing class action lawsuit.

Plaintiff Michele Edwards filed the lawsuit against Bridgestone, Continental, Goodyear, Michelin and other major tire manufacturers, claiming they significantly increased the prices of replacement tires in 2021 and 2022 due to market concentration, largely inelastic demand for tires and high barriers to entry.

“By 2023, inflation had eased and supply chain logistics had recovered, but tire prices remained high, despite excess supply,” the lawsuit says. “In a normal functioning economy, as costs lowered and there was excess supply, prices would lower too, as inflated prices would lead to a loss of market share.”

However, the tire makers allegedly continued to sell the tires at inflated prices even after the costs of production decreased.

Tire price-fixing possible due to ‘oligopolistic’ market, tire class action alleges

Edwards filed the tire class action lawsuit after the European Commission announced Jan. 30 it raided tire manufacturers over concerns the companies may have violated European Union antitrust rules by engaging in price coordination.

“The U.S. tire market is oligopolistic, with three of the defendants controlling the lion’s share of the market: in 2022, defendants Bridgestone, Michelin and Goodyear made up almost 64 percent of the entire replacement tire market,” the class action lawsuit asserts.

Edwards asserts this small concentration of market power makes it easier for the companies to conspire and engage in a tire price-fixing scheme. 

The tire class action lawsuit says the defendants violated the federal Sherman Act by artificially restraining competition with regard to new replacement tires for passenger vehicles sold in the United States.

Edwards filed the lawsuit on behalf of herself and a proposed class of individuals who purchased tires from any of the defendants at supracompetitive prices.

Last year, Michelin recalled a number of its replacement tires because they failed to meet traction requirements.

What do you think about the allegations in the tire price-fixing lawsuit? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.

Edwards is represented by Michelle C. Clerkin, Jason C. Spiro, David B. Harrison and Shomik Ghosh of Spiro Harrison & Nelson and Rachel Dapper of Dapper Law PA.

The tire price-fixing class action lawsuit is Michele Edwards v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01092, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

• Energizer, Walmart lawsuits allege battery price-fixing
• Companies hit with lawsuits, agree to settlements over price-fixing allegations
• 5 universities reach $104.5M settlement in student aid price-fixing class action
• Generic drug makers to pay combined $45M in settlements to end price-fixing litigation