By Kim Gale  |  September 14, 2018

Category: Consumer News

Wisconsin Woman Alleges Nissan and Debt Collector Had Car Repossessed IllegallyA Wisconsin woman has filed a lawsuit against Nissan and Select Recovery Agents (SRA) because she alleges they illegally had her car repossessed.

Plaintiff Sandra W. says Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and SRA violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Wisconsin Consumer Act.

According to the debtor’s rights lawsuit, Sandra leased a car from Nissan in 2015. After three years of maintaining payments, she allegedly fell behind on her payments in 2018.

Plaintiff: Wisconsin Car Repossessed Illegally

Sandra says that around 4 a.m. on Aug. 6, 2018, she woke up and saw a representatives of SRA attempting to repossess her vehicle. She says she went outside and verbally protested the seizure of her vehicle, but SRA continued with the repossession.

According to Sandra’s lawsuit, “A breach of peace occurs when a vehicle is repossessed over the objection of the debtor.”

Sandra contends that SRA could not have legally seized the vehicle because she verbally protested, which is a breach of the peace and a violation of Wisconsin state law.

She also contends that the Wisconsin Consumer Act governs repossessions. The Act says, “In taking possession of collateral or leased goods, no merchant may do any of the following:

  • Commit a breach of the peace.
  • Enter a dwelling used by the customer as a residence except at the voluntary request of a customer.”

Sandra seeks to have the motor vehicle’s lien voided and to have the payments she has made towards the car returned to her, in addition to reimbursement of attorney fees and costs.

Sandra claims Nissan and SRA violated the law by harassing her because she alleges they had no right to repossess her vehicle over her protest or with the use of the police. She claims that as a result of the alleged illegal conduct, she suffered emotional distress, mental anguish and loss of property because she had her car repossessed.

Although no one from Nissan was on site, the lawsuit alleges Nissan is vicariously liable for the conduct of SRA when Sandra had her car repossessed.

According to the state of Wisconsin’s Department of Financial Institutions, the Wisconsin Consumer Act is considered the most comprehensive law of its type in the U.S. The Wisconsin Consumer Act was enacted in 1973 to regulate consumer credit transactions and debt collection.

If you have had a car repossessed or any other motor vehicle repossessed, you could be eligible to participate in this lawsuit investigation. Your rights are protected by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and by any state-level consumer rights laws that apply to repossessions.

The Car Repossessed Lawsuit is Case No. 18-cv-1256 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division.

Join a Free Unfair Collection Practices Class Action Lawsuit Investigation

If you’ve been hit with unfair debt collection practices, you may have a legal claim and could be owed compensation for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

 

Get a Free Case Evaluation Now

DISCLAIMER: Debt collection itself is not illegal. However, debt collection firms collecting on consumer debts must adhere to the FDCPA. Even though debt attorneys are investigating these companies, their debt collection practices may be legal.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

3 thoughts onWisconsin Woman Alleges Nissan and Debt Collector Had Car Repossessed Illegally

  1. TESHEBA JONES says:

    Yes i had my 2007 nissan altima repo illegally then the payments i made the would not apply it to the repo i had to pay repossession fees and still didnt get my car bl they sold it at an auction add me

  2. J. Pihl says:

    Happened to my daughter with a VW beetle after she was going to purchase the vehicle from the lease. When the dealer found out she only had 12,000 miles on it after nearly 5 years they knew they could sell it for more than we were going to give them. Had we been in WI instead of Illinois(Crook County), we would have won. The dealer was out of business within a year…maybe he was doing it to others…tried it with my Mercury Sable after I made 69 payments on time..same situation, but I was able to recover the car for about $400, and kept it for 7 more years. That dealer was also out of business within a year. Hope the lady gets her money…

  3. Joe says:

    Wow, just pay your car note or they’ll repo….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.