Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
Although the Final Fairness Hearing for the Vibram FiveFingers settlement was held on Oct. 29, the federal judge overseeing the case has not yet approved the settlement as he is considering multiple objections filed by Class Members who argue the class action settlement is unfair.
On Nov. 12, the plaintiffs filed a motion asking the judge to grant final approval to the class action settlement. Yesterday, an objector filed a motion with the court claiming that the Vibram FiveFingers settlement is unfair and should not be approved because it will provide Class Members with substantially less value than they had been promised.
In her objection to the Vibram FiveFingers class action settlement, Madeline Cain argues, “The substantial disparity between the Notice’s estimate and the actual per pair benefit makes the proposed settlement unfair.”
Cain argues that the notice of the Vibram class action settlement indicated that Class Members who submit claims should expect to receive a payment in the range of $20-$50, although they could receive up to $94 from the deal. However, at the Final Fairness Hearing, attorneys for the plaintiffs indicated Class Members would actually receive closer to $9 from the Vibram FiveFingers settlement.
“In other words, class members would not be receiving $94 per pair, or even $50 per pair, as estimated by the class notice; nor would class members receive $20 per pair – the low-end of the range provided in the Notice,” Cain argues in opposition to the Vibram class action settlement.
“Rather, at the Fairness Hearing, Plaintiffs’ counsel represented that class members would likely receive a high-end amount of $8.95 and a low-end of $8.50, either of which is less than half the amount stated as the low-end of the range in the class notice, and less than 10% of the amount listed by Plaintiffs’ counsel as the high-end of the range per pair ($94.00),” Cain continues.
Class Members of the Vibram class action settlement include consumers who purchased FiveFingers running shoes between March 21, 2009 and May 27, 2014. Nearly 155,000 claims were reportedly submitted for the Vibram FiveFingers settlement, 67 percent of which were claims for two pairs of the running shoes.
Plaintiff Valerie Bezdek filed the first Vibram class action lawsuit in 2012, alleging the company misled consumers about the benefits of its FiveFingers running shoes. She took issue with the company’s assertions that the running shoes could strengthen foot muscles and reduce injuries, arguing that these claims were not backed by scientific evidence.
Vibram denies the allegations but agreed to settle the FiveFingers class action lawsuits, seeking to avoid the expense and uncertainty of ongoing litigation. The Vibram FiveFingers settlement will resolve three class action lawsuits that were filed in Massachusetts and California federal court.
The deadline to file a claim for the Vibram class action settlement passed on Sept. 24.
Further information about the status of the Vibram FiveFingers class action settlement was not immediately available. Keep checking TopClassActions.com or sign up for our free newsletter for the latest updates. You can also mark this article as a “Favorite” using your free Top Class Actions account to receive notifications when this article is updated.
Class Members are represented by Janine L. Pollack of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Friedman & Herz LLP, among others.
The Vibram FiveFingers Class Action Lawsuits are Valerie Bezdek v. Vibram USA Inc., et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-10513-DPW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; De Falco v. Vibram USA Inc., et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-10764-DPW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; and Safavi v. Vibram USA Inc., et al., Case No. 12-5900-BRO-JCG, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
UPDATE: On Dec. 31, 2015, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Vibram FiveFingers class action settlement, finding that the payout to Class Members is fair even if they will receive a far smaller refund than was estimated in the Class Notice.
UPDATE 2: On June 15, 2016, Top Class Actions readers who submitted timely and valid claims for the Vibram FiveFingers settlement began receiving checks worth as much as $20.21!
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
21 thoughts onObjections Delay Approval of Vibram FiveFingers Settlement
Heck, if they want proof, I have four pairs in my closet right now, between my husband and I. And I have the receipts from the orthopedist I had to see when I fractured three bones in my foot from wearing them too often, before the warning came out.
Any new updates on this settlement. Thanks
I never received notice of the lawsuit!! I just heard about it today (9/16/2015). Why wasn’t wider notice sent?
The settlement is for 3.5 million. The 150000 claimants are getting $8.50 a pair or 1.3 million. The lawyers are taking the rest or 2.2 million dollars. What a joke.
They could have initiated a study at ANY time. Personally, I had a myriad of odd issues which presented with the shoes (and left when the shoes did). I wanted them to work and I believed the hype. Glad they worked out for you. In the real world of pavement, these shoes are simply not the answer to anything as far as I am concerned…
Ridiculous – I paid BIG money for these shoes and the plaintiffs lawyers are eating up the MAJORITY of the settlement. This is an outrage! $8.50 a pair? What a miscarriage!
Lawsuits like this should be thrown out, I bet the majority of claimants were perfectly happy with their Fivefingers shoes but just wanted to jump on the opportunity for free cash. As an owner of 4 pairs of the shoes and a customer of theirs for over 5 years I can attest to the fact that they definitely strengthened the muscles in my legs and feet and improved my balance. As for the preventing injury part I would argue that having strengthened muscles and improved balance would lead to less injury. What a load of baloney this lawsuit is. Vibram should do a scientific study to prove their claims once and for all and rub the results in the faces of all their critics. Fivefingers are my favorite kind of footwear and I prefer to wear them over any other shoe when I can’t just go barefoot.
What a joke. I recall paying at least 80 bucks for each pair I bought, and they want to pay us a tenth of that and call it a fair settlement? I’m willing to bet a majority of them filed a false claim for free money. These people didn’t all buy two pairs of shoes, they’re just thieves.
These shoes were insanely popular. While I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some false claims, there were definitely way more people who bought who didn’t file then who filed and didn’t buy. I have several pair laying around the house because I work in and out of the ocean and use them for their original stated purpose.
The lawyers are eating the settlement – not the claimants.
answer me this was her objection overruled because we need to move forward and get paid
jennell,
I hope for all our sakes that her objection was NOT overruled because for those of us who actually put out REAL money for our Vibram shoes, we’d like to be able to recover some of our losses. We can wait.
Can’t believe I missed the deadline on this as I bought two five finger shoes and ruined my feet.
You ruined your feet because you weren’t able to read and follow the instructions provided by Vibram on how to break into barefoot running, not because of any issue with the shoes.
My two pairs did NOT come with any advisory about barefoot running. Only after the complaints and injuries began to present did they do anything to minimize their liability.