General Motors PCV System Class Action Lawsuit Overview:
- Who: A group of General Motors vehicle owners have filed a class action lawsuit against the car manufacturer.
- Why: Vehicle owners claim GM fails to disclose an alleged defect with the positive crank ventilation system in certain vehicles it manufactures and sells.
- Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Michigan federal court.
General Motors fails to disclose a defect with the positive crank ventilation system (PCV) in their vehicles’ internal combustion engines, a new class action lawsuit alleges.
A group of GM vehicle owners claim the PCV systems in certain vehicles manufactured by the company are prone to “plugging and clogging” during cold weather.
The vehicles affected by the alleged defect are GM’s 2010-2016 Buick Lacrosse, 2011-2017 Buick Regal, 2012-2017 Buick Verano, 2010-2015 Chevrolet Captiva, 2010-2017 Chevrolet Equinox, 2013-2014 Chevrolet Malibu and 2010-2017 GMC Terrain vehicles, according to the class action lawsuit.
In the event a PCV system malfunctions, the owners argue the vehicle’s engine pressure can increase and lead to a rupture of its rear main seal, which they say can cause both catastrophic and permanent damage.
GM, vehicle owners claim, sent out a “Diagnostic Tip” bulletin to dealers, but not to customers, in 2019 on account of the alleged clogging issue.
GM Class Action Claims Automaker Neither Recalled Affected Vehicles Nor Extended Warranties
Vehicle owners argue, meanwhile, that GM neither recalled the vehicles nor extended their warranties, instead electing only to “advised technicians to use a drill bit to clean out the clogged orifice.”
Further, vehicle owners claim GM has known since “at least 1985” about the “PCV system’s vulnerability to cold weather and clogging” with owners arguing the company has repeatedly advised dealers on “how to fix” the issue.
“Despite this track record, GM continues to conceal this defect from consumers at the point of sale and continues to design, manufacture, distribute and sell hundreds of thousands of vehicles prone to this defect,” the class action lawsuit states.
Vehicle owners claim GM is guilty of unjust enrichment and fraudulent concealment, among other things, and in violation of a number of state consumer protection acts.
The vehicle owners want to represent a nationwide Class and Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York and Wisconsin subclasses of all persons or entities who purchased or leased one or more of the affected GM vehicles.
Plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and requesting injunctive relief along with costs, restitution and punitive, exemplary and treble damages for themselves and all class members.
In related news, GM recalled more than 740,000 2010-2017 GMC Terrain vehicles last month over concerns the vehicles’ lower head lamps could present a glare issue due to a headlight housing defect.
Have you purchased a GM vehicle containing a defective PCV system? Let us know in the comments!
The plaintiffs are represented by E. Powell Miller, Sharon S. Almonrode and Dennis A. Lienhardt of The Miller Law Firm PC and Steve W. Berman, Jerrod C. Patterson and Anthea D. Grivas of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.
The General Motors PCV System Class Action Lawsuit is Kiriacopoulos, et al. v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 2:22-cv-10785, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Don’t Miss Out!
Check out our list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Settlements you may qualify to join!
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
- GM Class Action Claims Transmission Defect Causes Jerking, Lurching in Lower Gears
- GM Recalls Around 680K 2014-15 Chevrolet Equinox, GMC Terrain Vehicles Over Windshield Wiper Defect
- The Worst Car Brands Based on Class Action Lawsuits and Recalls
- Ford Recalls 737K Vehicles Due to Risk of Fiery Oil Leak, Faulty Trailer Brakes
250 thoughts onGM Class Action Alleges Automaker Fails To Disclose Engine-Related Defect
On February 2, 2026 in Wilmington OH. I was coming home from the gym in – 4 degree temperatures in a 2017 GMC Terrain with a 2.4L engine. The vehicle lost significant power, and I slowly drove home. As I turned into the driveway (22 miles later) a low oil pressure warning came on and I shut off the engine.
At around 11:30 am I spoke with Tim with Atkinson’s Automotive in Hillsboro, OH. Before I finished describing what had happened he informed me he had 2 or 3 vehicles with the same issue in front of me and to have it towed down. By 1:30pm the Terrain was taken to their shop. The estimate is for between $3600 – $4000 to replace the pcv valve with a vertical aftermarket valve and repair the blown seal.
Please let me know of what my next steps are to recoup at least some of the cost of not having a vehicle for 21 days plus final repair costs. It is being fixed this week (Feb 17-21) 2026.
We bought a used buick verano 2012 from a car dealership for $10,000. Was able to drive for about a year when the engine started misfiring due to a whole in a part at the bottom of the engine. My dad had to take the engine out and rebuild it and cost him a lot of money.
Experiencing this same issue with a 2017 Chevy Equinox right now. Yesterday morning, driving to work car stopped driving and I had to glide into a parking lot. Sure enough, massive oil leak from the rear main seal, more than likely due to the PCV issue. Located in Massachusetts. Have already been quoted $1500+.
I’m having this exact same issue on my ’12 Cruze. Is/was there a suit involving the Cruze for a similar problem, and if not, would it be advisable to look into a class action for it?
2020 CHevy Trax PCV non return valve completely disintegrated 80K miles. I caught it in time and repaired with an aftermarket kit. I reufused to replace the intake manifold putting another defective part on the car…