A federal judge in Illinois is dismissing some defendants in a Medicare FCA lawsuit, but isn’t letting one off the hook for possible Medicare fraud.
Whistleblower Cherry G. worked for MedStar Health Inc., a not-for-profit healthcare organization which operates, among other entities, 10 hospitals in the Baltimore/DC area.
Medstar Health Inc., Cherry knew, had a relationship with a medical billing service, Accretive.
Cherry says she noticed that sometimes when MedStar would see a patient, the patient might be classified as observation-only and not be admitted to the hospital, Accretive, their billing service, would reclassify the same patient as admissible as an inpatient, thereby charging more money to Medicare.
MedStar, she claims, participated in this scheme by asking for a “second opinion” for many Medicare and Medicaid patients. By reclassifying the patients as needing more services than they actually did, both MedStar and Accretive, she claims, defrauded the federal government.
Cherry claims that when Accretive reviewed the cases and recommended the patients be admitted as inpatient, they often overrode the judgment of doctors and allowed the hospitals to submit inflated bills.
MedStar denies these claims and says there no basis for what Cherry is alleging.
However, according to Law360, the judge noted that “[Cherry] alleges, for example, that one patient was examined by a [Washington, D.C.] emergency room physician for complaints of lower back pain and resulting inability to walk.”
“The physician found that the patient’s condition did not medically justify a full hospital admission and prescribed an initial observation of her condition. Accretive changed the patient’s diagnosis, representing that ‘[d]ue to inability to ambulate patient is at immediate risk for traumatic fall injuries, increased morbidity and mortality,’” the judge said.
According to this Medicare FCA lawsuit, Cherry claims that these violations occurred between 2012 and 2013 while she worked as a service associate with MedStar’s emergency department.
In her Medicare FCA lawsuit, she cited False Claims Act violations not only by Medstar, but by other healthcare organizations including Methodist Healthcare System and Southeast Health System. Cherry claimed that these healthcare organizations had the same relationship with Accretive that MedStar did.
These other defendants were dismissed from the Medicare FCA lawsuit by the Illinois federal court judge because there was no evidence for such claims.
However, she was able to provide documentation and evidence for at least nine counts of False Claims Act violations perpetrated by Accretive and MedStar.
Even though other healthcare organizations were dismissed for lack of evidence, attorneys are confident that discovery will reveal similar agreements between Accretive and other hospitals.
In general, whistleblower and qui tam lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions. Whistleblowers can only join this investigation if they are reporting fraud against the government, meaning that the government must be the victim, and that the alleged fraud should be a substantial loss of money.
Do YOU have a legal claim? Fill out the form on this page now for a free, immediate, and confidential case evaluation. The attorneys who work with Top Class Actions will contact you if you qualify to let you know if an individual qui tam lawsuit or whistleblower class action lawsuit is best for you. Hurry — statutes of limitations may apply.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2026 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
Get Help – It’s Free
Join a Free Whistleblower, Qui Tam Lawsuit Investigation
If you believe that you have witnessed fraud committed against the government, you may have a legal claim. Whistleblowers can only join this investigation if they are reporting fraud against the government, meaning that the government must be the victim, and that the alleged fraud should be a substantial loss of money.
See if you qualify to pursue compensation and join a whistleblower lawsuit investigation by submitting your information for a free case evaluation.
An attorney will contact you if you qualify to discuss the details of your potential case.
Please Note: If you want to participate in this investigation, it is imperative that you reply to the law firm if they call or email you. Failing to do so may result in you not getting signed up as a client, if you qualify, or getting you dropped as a client.
Oops! We could not locate your form.