Anne Bucher  |  September 8, 2016

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

babyganics-mineral-based-sunscreenKAS Direct LLC d/b/a Babyganics has been hit with a class action lawsuit alleging its baby products are not organic, despite the company’s representations.

Plaintiffs Tanya Mayhew and Tanveer Alibhai filed the Babyganics class action lawsuit yesterday in New York federal court, accusing the Babyganics company of engaging in unlawful, unfair, deceptive and misleading business practices regarding the marketing and sale of Babyganics products.

According to the class action lawsuit, the Babyganics line includes a number of baby products, including sunscreen, lotion, shampoo, body wash, rash cream, toothpaste, baby wipes, dish soap and laundry detergent.

Mayhew and Alibhai claim that the defendants chose the name “Babyganics” to give the impression its baby products are organic.

Further, the Babyganics class action lawsuit alleges the marketing materials for the Babyganics products are “replete with statements” indicating the products are organic.

The plaintiffs specifically take issue with the marketing of Babyganics “mineral sunscreen,” which they say use a combination of mineral and chemical sunscreens. According to the class action lawsuit, the Babyganics sunscreen is labeled as “mineral-based.”

“In fact, these Sunscreens are not mineral sunscreens, which use physical sunscreens such as Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide that sit on top of the skin to deflect and scatter UV rays away from the skin,” the Babyganics skincare lawsuit alleges.

“Instead, Defendant’s ‘mineral-based’ sunscreens use a combination of physical sunscreens and chemical sunscreens, which penetrate the skin and absorb UV radiation,” the plaintiffs argue.

According to the Babyganics skincare lawsuit, the sunscreens contain chemical ingredients such as octinoxate and octisalate.

Other Babyganics products are also misrepresented as organic, the deceptive marketing class action lawsuit alleges. However, the products include synthetic ingredients that are not organic, the Babyganics skincare lawsuit argues.

Mayhew and Alibhai claim that they chose to purchase Babyganics products because they believed they were organic and/or mineral-based as represented by the defendant.

They state that they would not have purchased the Babyganics products, or would not have paid a premium price for the products, had they known they were not truly organic or mineral-based.

The plaintiffs seek to represent a Class of consumers who purchased Babyganics products anywhere in the United States.

The Babyganics class action lawsuit asserts violations of New York Business Law, California’s Unfair Competition Law, California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and California’s Fair Advertising Law. The plaintiffs also assert a claim for unjust enrichment.

The Babyganics class action lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, damages, restitution, attorneys’ fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, punitive damages, and all other relief deemed appropriate by the court.

The plaintiffs have also asked the court to order Babyganics to immediately put an end to its allegedly deceptive, unlawful and fraudulent labeling and marketing of the baby products.

The plaintiffs are represented by Jason P. Sultzer of the Sultzer Law Group PC, Charles J. LaDuca and Katherine Van Dyck of Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca LLP, and Melissa W. Wolchansky and Amy E. Boyle of Halunen Law.

The Babyganics Class Action Lawsuit is Tanya Mayhew, et al. v. KAS Direct LLC, Case No. 7:16-cv-06981, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

UPDATE: On Aug. 4, 2017, the plaintiffs secured a false advertising class action settlement with the makers of Babyganics baby care products, resolving allegations that the company’s products are not actually organic as advertised.

UPDATE 2: August 2018, the Babyganics lotion, sunscreen, wipes, diapers class action settlement is now open. Click here to file a claim.

UPDATE 3: December 2019, Top Class Actions viewers started receiving checks in the mail worth as much as $340. Congratulations to everyone who filed a claim and got PAID!

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


 

28 thoughts onBabyganics Class Action Says Products Are Not Organic

  1. Kelly johnson says:

    Please include me. I’ve bought many of these products.

  2. Kelly johnson says:

    I’ve bought many of these products.

  3. Kisha says:

    I have also have been buying these products for my son. How can I get more information on this class action?

  4. Sara Strong says:

    i also purchase these overpriced lies for my 11 month old. So sad we cant trust them!

  5. Terri says:

    My daughter suffered severe burns in her eye after accidentally spraying some babyganics stain remover all over herself when she was 2. This product claims to be safe enough to ingest but when we went to the ER they said she suffered a base burn which is worst than an acid burn because it will keep burning until it’s completely flushed out. She has since recovered but we have no idea if there will be long term affects in the future. This is such a horrible company for claiming their product is safe enough to ingest.

  6. Angela says:

    I buy this brand at target.

  7. Sarah Nitti says:

    I was using these products on my daughter.. Please include me on this

  8. Victoria Sliger says:

    I purchase these products for me 19 month old and 2.5 year old

  9. Becky morris says:

    I also purchased this for my grandson I would like to be included

  10. Wendy Stauffer says:

    I bought this for my 2 yr old granddaughter. How sad that we have to go through these lengths to keep companies honest.

1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.