Babbel class action claims email ads use fake deadlines

Babbel class action overview:

• Who: Plaintiff Deborah Cerkezoglu filed a class action lawsuit against Babbel GmbH.
• Why: Cerkezoglu claims Babbel uses deceptive marketing to create a false sense of urgency through commercial emails and fake discount deadlines.
• Where: The Babbel class action lawsuit was filed in Washington state court.

A new class action lawsuit alleges Babbel GmbH misleadingly advertises “limited-time” discounts to Washington consumers through deceptive commercial emails. 

Plaintiff Deborah Cerkezoglu claims Babbel spams consumers with messages that suggest deals are about to expire when the promotions are actually extended or improved shortly after the supposed deadline. 

Cerkezoglu argues the company uses high-pressure tactics to convince consumers they are receiving a rare bargain that will soon disappear.

According to Babble’s class action, the language learning platform repeatedly tells consumers that substantial discounts, such as 65% off a lifetime subscription, are ending soon, only to keep those prices available for several days past the cutoff date. 

The complaint alleges these emails violate state regulations regarding commercial electronic mail by including misleading subject lines.

Cerkezoglu argues the company’s pricing strategy is “patently deceptive” and designed to mislead customers. She seeks to represent a class of Washington consumers who received these commercial emails and were subjected to the company’s “limited-time” marketing claims. 

This class action lawsuit seeks to hold the company accountable for violating Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA) and Consumer Protection Act.

CEMA lawsuit: Emails use fake countdowns to drive sales

The plaintiff asserts that the defendant had numerous opportunities to comply with federal guidance regarding bargain advertising but chose instead to utilize “phantom” deadlines. 

Cerkezoglu’s CEMA lawsuit aims to stop the dissemination of misleading promotional emails that she claims are intended to influence behavior through artificial value perceptions. She further alleges the company’s methods cause customers to spend money they otherwise might not have spent if they knew the promotion was not actually expiring.

The Babble’s class action lawsuit argues the company maintains a pattern of deceptive trade practices. The plaintiff demands a jury trial and seeks for the court to award statutory and punitive damages to the plaintiff and all affected class members.

In another CEMA lawsuit, a consumer accuses clothing retailer Nordstrom of falsely advertising discounts in emails sent to consumers for its Nordstrom Rack brand.

Have you ever received an email from Babbel claiming a discount was about to expire? Let us know in the comments.

The plaintiff is represented by Samuel J. Strauss and Raina C. Borrelli of Strauss Borrelli PLLC.The Babbel class action lawsuit is Cerkezoglu v. Babbel GmbH, Case No. 26-2-00040-14, in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Grays Harbor.

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

• White Oak Pastures issues consumer alert for metal contamination of ground beef
• PayGOV class action alleges payment processor charges undisclosed junk fees
• Staples class action claims company negligent in employee data theft
• SweetLeaf class action claims monk fruit ‘organic’ sweetener is mostly erythritol